Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Capacity Design of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building for Earthquake Loading


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India
 

Background: The capacity design philosophy permits ductile components of a structural system to yield, whereas the brittle components are not permitted to fail. Therefore, brittle components should have sufficiently higher strength compared to ductile components. The “strong-column / weak-beam” design philosophy ensures good ductility and a preferable collapse mechanism in the building. The failure mode wherein the beams form hinges is usually considered to be the most favourable mode for ensuring good global energy-dissipation without much degradation of capacity at the connections. In order to ensure this favourable failure mode design codes recommend a minimum value of Moment Capacity Ratio (MCR). Methods: MCR is defined as the ratio of cumulative column moment capacity to cumulative beam moment capacity framing to a particular joint. Calculation of MCR is complicated as the column bending strength varies with the axial load. A family of RC framed building models is analysed in this study for earthquake load considering various load combinations given in relevant Indian standards. A range of axial force that may arise in the column sections during an event of design earthquake are obtained. Findings/Applications: A simplified procedure to calculate MCR empirically is proposed. The proposed method is computationally simple for calculating nominal design strength of the column to be used in determining MCR at a beam-column joint.

Keywords

Capacity based Design, Earthquake Load, MCR, Reinforced Concrete, Strong Column Weak Beam.
User

Abstract Views: 180

PDF Views: 0




  • Capacity Design of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building for Earthquake Loading

Abstract Views: 180  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

A. Mistri
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India
P. Sarkar
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India

Abstract


Background: The capacity design philosophy permits ductile components of a structural system to yield, whereas the brittle components are not permitted to fail. Therefore, brittle components should have sufficiently higher strength compared to ductile components. The “strong-column / weak-beam” design philosophy ensures good ductility and a preferable collapse mechanism in the building. The failure mode wherein the beams form hinges is usually considered to be the most favourable mode for ensuring good global energy-dissipation without much degradation of capacity at the connections. In order to ensure this favourable failure mode design codes recommend a minimum value of Moment Capacity Ratio (MCR). Methods: MCR is defined as the ratio of cumulative column moment capacity to cumulative beam moment capacity framing to a particular joint. Calculation of MCR is complicated as the column bending strength varies with the axial load. A family of RC framed building models is analysed in this study for earthquake load considering various load combinations given in relevant Indian standards. A range of axial force that may arise in the column sections during an event of design earthquake are obtained. Findings/Applications: A simplified procedure to calculate MCR empirically is proposed. The proposed method is computationally simple for calculating nominal design strength of the column to be used in determining MCR at a beam-column joint.

Keywords


Capacity based Design, Earthquake Load, MCR, Reinforced Concrete, Strong Column Weak Beam.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2016%2Fv9i30%2F129451