Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Advanced Filtering Methods Application for Sensitivity Enhancement during AE Testing of Operating Structures


Affiliations
1 National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow, Russia
 

Background/Objectives: The article considers different filtering methods for acoustic emission data. The discussion of data filtering algorithms is aimed at improving the noise immunity of the acoustic emission system. Method: Noise filtering methods (frequency filtering, time series disorder detection, etc.) are examined for AE testing. Findings: One problem of the acoustic emission testing is a great number of noises affecting the diagnosis results. Electric noises, electromagnetic interference, background acoustic noise, rubbing noises are far from the full list of noises available during measurements. At the high level of noises, the operator has to increase the recording threshold of the acoustic emission impulses through reducing the testing sensitivity at the risk of missing a dangerous defect. Lack of the data filtering can result in an incorrect localization and erroneous definition of the danger level of acoustic emission source. Different noise types have been investigated and noise classification method according to the filtering complexity has been suggested to solve effectively the problem of the acoustic emission test data filtering. Wavelet-filtering efficiency for white stochastic noise removal has been shown. Algorithm for impulse noise filtering has been described. Improvements: The offered data processing approaches allow enhancing the sensitivity of AE testing especially for the operating structures.

Keywords

Acoustic Emission (AE) of Operating Structures, Signal Processing, Time Series Analysis.
User

Abstract Views: 159

PDF Views: 0




  • Advanced Filtering Methods Application for Sensitivity Enhancement during AE Testing of Operating Structures

Abstract Views: 159  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Igor V. Sokolov
National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow, Russia
Vyacheslav M. Matyunin
National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow, Russia
Vera A. Barat
National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow, Russia
Dmitriy V. Chernov
National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow, Russia
Artem Yu. Marchenkov
National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow, Russia

Abstract


Background/Objectives: The article considers different filtering methods for acoustic emission data. The discussion of data filtering algorithms is aimed at improving the noise immunity of the acoustic emission system. Method: Noise filtering methods (frequency filtering, time series disorder detection, etc.) are examined for AE testing. Findings: One problem of the acoustic emission testing is a great number of noises affecting the diagnosis results. Electric noises, electromagnetic interference, background acoustic noise, rubbing noises are far from the full list of noises available during measurements. At the high level of noises, the operator has to increase the recording threshold of the acoustic emission impulses through reducing the testing sensitivity at the risk of missing a dangerous defect. Lack of the data filtering can result in an incorrect localization and erroneous definition of the danger level of acoustic emission source. Different noise types have been investigated and noise classification method according to the filtering complexity has been suggested to solve effectively the problem of the acoustic emission test data filtering. Wavelet-filtering efficiency for white stochastic noise removal has been shown. Algorithm for impulse noise filtering has been described. Improvements: The offered data processing approaches allow enhancing the sensitivity of AE testing especially for the operating structures.

Keywords


Acoustic Emission (AE) of Operating Structures, Signal Processing, Time Series Analysis.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2016%2Fv9i42%2F124011