Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Clearfelling and Reforestation on Runoff and Peak Rates in Small Watersheds


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Two small forest (brush) Watersheds W1F (1.45 ha) and W2F (0.87 ha) were calibrated for 8 years (1961-68). During calibration period W1F gave 18% more runoff and 63% higher peak rate of runoff as compared to W2F. In the year 1969, W1F was clearfelled and reafforested with Eucalyptus species. The post calibration relationship indicates that W1F (treated) after afforestation gave 10% less runoff and peak rates of runoff as compared to W2F (untreated). The total reduction of 28% in runoff and 73% in peak rate is due to afforestation resulting in fully stocked plantation and a dense undergrowth. The study has quantitatively indicated the effectiveness of afforestation for flood control purposes by reducing runoff (28%) and of drastically reducing the peak rate of runoff (73%).
Font Size

User
About The Authors

R. N. Mathur

Ram Babu

P. Joshie

Bakhshish Singh


Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications

Abstract Views: 239

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Clearfelling and Reforestation on Runoff and Peak Rates in Small Watersheds

Abstract Views: 239  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abstract


Two small forest (brush) Watersheds W1F (1.45 ha) and W2F (0.87 ha) were calibrated for 8 years (1961-68). During calibration period W1F gave 18% more runoff and 63% higher peak rate of runoff as compared to W2F. In the year 1969, W1F was clearfelled and reafforested with Eucalyptus species. The post calibration relationship indicates that W1F (treated) after afforestation gave 10% less runoff and peak rates of runoff as compared to W2F (untreated). The total reduction of 28% in runoff and 73% in peak rate is due to afforestation resulting in fully stocked plantation and a dense undergrowth. The study has quantitatively indicated the effectiveness of afforestation for flood control purposes by reducing runoff (28%) and of drastically reducing the peak rate of runoff (73%).