Indian Forester

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Biomass Accumulation and Carbon Storage in Six-Year-Old Citrus reticulata Blanco.Plantation


Affiliations
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001, India
2 Department of Botany, Govt. Degree College, Kathua–184104, Jammu and Kashmir, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The potential of fruit trees to sequester carbon and thereby provide an environmental service remains unexploited. Although not fully understood, CO2 fixation in fruit orchards is probably higher in comparison to fixation in annual herbaceous crops. The present study was conducted in Jhalawar district of Rajasthan State, western India. A total of 7 trees were harvested to assess the biomass and carbon content in various parts of Citrus reticulata, and derive the allometric biomass equation for future research. The mean aboveground biomass was 10.05±0.03 Kg tree-1. The average aboveground allocation of biomass was nearly 76% and belowground biomass was 24%. The maximum carbon was stored by fruit biomass (2.10 Kg tree-1) followed by ischolar_mains (1.42 Kg tree-1) and branches (1.11 Kg tree-1). Total carbon stored by 6 yr old C. reticulata plantation was 5.94 Kg tree-1 and 1.65 t C ha-1. A total of four biomass models were studied for developing a reliable equation for biomass estimation. All four models were found to be statistically significant (Ftest, P < 0.01) for all the aboveground and belowground plant parts, along with total biomass. Models with diameter as the only independent variable had less bias percentage (bias%) and percentage ischolar_main mean square error (RMSE%) values than the models with diameter and height as the independent variables.

Keywords

Biomass, Biomass Model, Carbon Content, Nagpur Mandarin, RMSE%.
Font Size

User
About The Authors

Lal Chand Mehta
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001
India

Jitendra Singh
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001
India

P. S. Chauhan
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001
India

Bhim Singh
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001
India

R. K. Manhas
Department of Botany, Govt. Degree College, Kathua–184104, Jammu and Kashmir
India


Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications

  • Anandarajah G., Kesicki F. and Pye S. (2010). Carbon Tax vs. Cap-and-Trade: Implications on Developing Countries Emissions. IAEE International Conference, June 6-9, 2010, RIO, Brazil.

  • Anon. (2012). Indian Horticulture Database. National Horticulture Board, Gurgaon, Haryana,p. 64.

  • Brown S. (1996). Present and potential roles of forests in the global climate change debate. Unasylva, 185: 3-10.

  • Bwalya J.M. (2012). Estimation of Net Carbon Sequestration Potential of Citrus under Different Management Systems Using the Life Cycle Approach. A dissertation submitted to the University of Zambia in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science in agronomy the University of Zambia.

  • Canadell J.G. and Raupach M.R. (2008). Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science, 320: 1456-1457.

  • Chandra A. and Yamdagani R. (1983). Determination of ischolar_main distribution in Tangelo cv. Pearl by ischolar_main excavation. Philippine Agriculturist, 66: 190-197.

  • da Silva G.F., Gezan S.A., Soares C.P.B. and Zaneti L.Z. (2013). Modelling Growth and Yield of Schizolobium amazonicum under Different Spacing. International Journal of Forestry Research, 3: 1-10.

  • FAO (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010- Country Report Ethiopia. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome, Italy.

  • Hawkins T. (1987). Volume and weight tables for Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Dalbergia sissoo, Acacia auriculoformis and Casia simea. Banko Janakari, 1(2): 29-30.

  • Jana B.K, Biswas S., Majumder M., Roy P.K. and Mazumdar A. (2009). Carbon sequestration rate and aboveground biomass carbon potential of four young species. J. Eco. and Nat. Envi., 1(2): 15-24.

  • Janssens I.A., Freiebauer A., Ciais P., Smith P., Nabuurs G.J., Folberth G., Schalamadinger B., Hutjes R.W. A., Ceulemans R., Schulze E.D., Valentini R. and Dolman H. (2003). Europe's terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science, 300: 1538-1542.

  • Juwarkar A.A., Varghese A.O., Singh S.K., Aher V.V. and Thawale P.R. (2011). Carbon sequestration potential in aboveground biomass of natural reserve forest of central India. International Journal of Agriculture Research and Review, 1(2): 80-86

  • Leboeuf A., Beaudoin A., Fournier R.A., Guindon L., Luther J.E., and Lambert M.C. (2007). A shadow fraction method for mapping biomass of northern boreal black Spruce forests using Quickbird imagery. RemoteSensing of Environment, 110(4): 488-500.

  • Manner H.I., Bucker R.S., Smith V.E., Ward D. and Elevitch C.R. (2006). Citrus species (Citrus) ver. 2.1. In: Species profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources Holualua Hawai [Online] (Elevitch C. R. ed).. Available from: http//www.traditionaltree.org.

  • Morgan, K.T., J.M.S. Scholberg, T.A. Obreza and Wheaton T.A. (2006). Size, biomass, and nitrogen relationships with sweet orange tree growth. J. the American Society of Horti. Sci., 131: 149-156.

  • Naidu S.L., DeLucia E.H. and Thomas R.B. (1998). Contrasting patterns of biomass allocation in dominant and suppressed Loblolly Pine. Canadian J. Forest Research, 28: 1116-1124.

  • Negi J.D.S., Manhas R.K. and Chauhan P.S. (2003). Carbon allocation in different components of some tree species of India: A new approach for Carbon estimation. Current Science, 85: 1528-1531.

  • Onyekwelu J.C. (2004). Above ground biomass production and biomass equations for even aged Gmelina arborea (Roxb.) plantations in South-Western Nigeria.Biomass and Bioenergy 26: 39-46.

  • Page G., Kelly T., Minor M. and Cameron E. (2011). Modelling carbon footprints of organic orchard production systems to address carbon trading: an approach based on life cycle assessment. Hortscience, 46: 324–327.

  • Poudel B.S., Gautam S.K. and Bhandari D.N. (2011). Above-ground tree biomass and allometric relationships of Cinnamomum tamala grown in the western hill regions of Nepal. Banko Janakari 21(1): 3-12.

  • Rajchal R. and Meilby H. (2013). Above-ground biomass models for Seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia) in Mustang District, Nepal. Banko Janakari, 23(1): 23-34.

  • Robertson G.P., Paul E.A. and Harwood R.R. (2000). Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture, contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science, 289: 1922-1925.

  • Satto T. and Madgwick H. (1982). Forest Biomass. Martinus Nishoff, Boston, M.A., USA.

  • Schlesinger W.H. and Lichter J. (2001). Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased atmospheric CO2 Nature, 441: 466-469.

  • UNFCCC (2011). Project Design Document Form for Afforestation and Reforestation Project Activities (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05 1/100; CDM - Executive Board.

  • Wang J.R., Letchford T., Comeau P. and Kimmins J.P. (2000). Above-and belowground biomass and nutrient distribution of a Paper Birch and Subalpine Fir mixed species stand in the sub-boreal Spruce zone of British Colombia. Forest Ecology and Management,130: 17-26.

  • Zanotelli D., Montagnani L., Manca G. and Tagliavini M. (2013). Net primary productivity, allocation pattern and carbon use efficiency in an apple orchard assessed by integrating eddy covariance, biometric and continuous soil chamber measurements. Biogeosciences, 10: 3089-3108.


Abstract Views: 265

PDF Views: 0




  • Biomass Accumulation and Carbon Storage in Six-Year-Old Citrus reticulata Blanco.Plantation

Abstract Views: 265  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Lal Chand Mehta
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001, India
Jitendra Singh
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001, India
P. S. Chauhan
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001, India
Bhim Singh
College of Horticulture and Forestry (Agriculture University, Kota), Jhalawar Rajasthan-326 001, India
R. K. Manhas
Department of Botany, Govt. Degree College, Kathua–184104, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Abstract


The potential of fruit trees to sequester carbon and thereby provide an environmental service remains unexploited. Although not fully understood, CO2 fixation in fruit orchards is probably higher in comparison to fixation in annual herbaceous crops. The present study was conducted in Jhalawar district of Rajasthan State, western India. A total of 7 trees were harvested to assess the biomass and carbon content in various parts of Citrus reticulata, and derive the allometric biomass equation for future research. The mean aboveground biomass was 10.05±0.03 Kg tree-1. The average aboveground allocation of biomass was nearly 76% and belowground biomass was 24%. The maximum carbon was stored by fruit biomass (2.10 Kg tree-1) followed by ischolar_mains (1.42 Kg tree-1) and branches (1.11 Kg tree-1). Total carbon stored by 6 yr old C. reticulata plantation was 5.94 Kg tree-1 and 1.65 t C ha-1. A total of four biomass models were studied for developing a reliable equation for biomass estimation. All four models were found to be statistically significant (Ftest, P < 0.01) for all the aboveground and belowground plant parts, along with total biomass. Models with diameter as the only independent variable had less bias percentage (bias%) and percentage ischolar_main mean square error (RMSE%) values than the models with diameter and height as the independent variables.

Keywords


Biomass, Biomass Model, Carbon Content, Nagpur Mandarin, RMSE%.

References