Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Huddar, Shivashankar
- Enhancement of Multidisciplinary PDR Course
Abstract Views :173 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Shivashankar Huddar
1,
Prashant Achari
1,
Sanjay Eligar
1,
Uma Mudenagudi
1,
Nalini Iyer
1,
A. B. Raju
1,
Arun Giriyapur
1,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
Nitin Kulkarni
1,
Ashok Shettar
1
Affiliations
1 B.V. B College Of Engineering And Technology, Hubli, Karnataka 580031, IN
1 B.V. B College Of Engineering And Technology, Hubli, Karnataka 580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No 2&3 (2015), Pagination: 62-68Abstract
This paper discusses enhancement in development of project-based 'product design and realization (PDR)' course for undergraduate students. The course offered at an early stage of the curriculum is aimed at providing engineering design and product realization skills to the students. Creating an appropriate learning experience in product design is challenging owing to its multidisciplinary nature. An innovative multidisciplinary design-to-realization approach is adopted in this course and student teams are required to design and build working prototypes for predefi ned products. This course brings a new perspective to the multidisciplinary approach to teaching product design. Introduction of project based design experience at an early level provides students with an opportunity to develop capabilities to design complex systems in the future. PDR (a 3 credit course) introduced to electrical and mechanical sciences students (EC, EE, IT, IP, A&R, ME) at fourth semester (2nd year) level of engineering in BVBCET, Hubli. The implementation of course is analyzed with respect to attainment of the outcomes (ABET a-k). Also to illustrate the success of the course, the work of students in the form of Product at the end of course is included in results for validation.Keywords
Design, Electrical and Mechanical Sciences, Outcomes (ABETa-k).- An Experience of Teaching Engineering Design for Freshman Students
Abstract Views :194 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Shivaprasad Mukhandmath
1,
Shivashankar Huddar
2,
Rajashekhar Savadi
1,
Gopalkrishna Joshi
3,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
Nalini Iyer
2,
Ashok Shettar
4
Affiliations
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
2 School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
3 Centre for Engineering Education & Research (CEER), KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
4 KLE Technological University, Hubballi, 580031, Karnataka, IN
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
2 School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
3 Centre for Engineering Education & Research (CEER), KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
4 KLE Technological University, Hubballi, 580031, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No SP 1 (2019), Pagination: 43-48Abstract
In recent years design thinking has taken center stage in the engineering curriculum. The driving force being the society and industries who need graduate engineers who can design, innovative, and creative products to help solve the real-world problems. The current paper discusses the experiences of a systematic approach in defining, teaching, and assessing the engineering design process to freshman engineering students at KLE Technological University (KLETU). The paper begins by defining 'design thinking' followed by briefly reviewing the role of engineering design and its importance in the engineering curriculum. Design is hard to learn but hardest to teach. Efforts have been made, in this work, to bring in the perspective of the pedagogy of activity-based teaching and its challenges and opportunities in teaching engineering design process at the freshman engineering level. This pedagogical approach, for freshman level, resulted in enhanced students learning.Keywords
Design, Freshman Engineering, Activity, Learning.References
- Mourtos NJ. Defining, teaching, and assessing engineering design skills. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) 2012; 2(1): 14–30.
- McDonald WM, Brogan DS, and Lohani VK et al., Developing a first-year engineering course at a university in India: international engineering education collaboration.
- Ambrose SA and Amon CH. Systematic Design of a FirstYear Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of Engineering Education; 86(2): 173– 181. URL 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00281.x.
- Genco N, Hölttä-Otto K, and Seepersad CC. An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 2012; 101(1): 60–81.
- Julie D. Burton and Daniel M. White, Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Education, 1999, 88(3), 327-332
- Payton LN. Design for manufacturing excellence (DFMX) begins at the freshman level. Journal of manufacturing systems 2005; 24(3): 178.
- Khalaf K, Balawi S, Hitt GW et al. Engineering Design Education: When, What, and How. Advances in Engineering Education 2013; 3(3): n3.
- Sanjay E, Sachin A, Uma M et al. Engineering Design: A Sophomore Course for Undergraduates in Electrical Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 2015; 196–201.
- Patil AY, Shivaprasad M, and Kodancha KG. Infusing Design Techniques-An Integrated Approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 2016.
- Dym CL and Little P. Engineering design: a project-based approach (2000).
- Hubka V and Eder WE. Pedagogics of design education. International Journal of Engineering Education 2003; 19(6): 799–809.
- Stojcevski A. Learning to solve ‘design problems’ in engineering education. Washington Accord http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Hitory/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL pdf 2014.