Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Moral Interactions and Happiness:A Psychological Perspective


Affiliations
1 310 Benfield Drive, Savannah, Georgia, 31406, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Happiness results, in part, from pleasant interpersonal relationships of which communicative acts and interactions are basic elements. Morality is observed as a foundation of human society and essential for positive interactional outcomes, and thus, for happiness. Interactions that end in mutual benefit to the dyadic members are the basis of happiness and fulfillment. Rationale and validity of this postulate are presented. The falsely perceived benefits of engaging in immoral interactions are based on a lack of understanding of human relations. The concept of mental sanctuary is proposed to explain how humans cope with their private urges and passions and how some people succumb to impulsive and immoral behavior. Research literature associated with Heiderian “balance criterion,” and P-O-X triads is examined to point out the connection of interpersonal tension in the structure of happiness.

Keywords

Happiness, Dyadic Interactions, Systems-Approach, Heiderian Balance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aderman, D. (1969). Effects of anticipating future interaction on the preference for balanced states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 214-219.
  • Cartwright, D., & Harary F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277-293.
  • DelleFave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The investigation of optimal experience and apathy: Development and psychosocial implications. European Psychologist, 10, 264-274.
  • DelleFave, A. (Ed.) (2013). The exploration of happiness: Present and future perspective. Springer.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row and Peterson.
  • Frankl, V.E. (2000). Man Search for Ultimate Meaning. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
  • Freud, S. (1913). The Interpretation of Dreams (3rd ed.). Trans. by A. A. Brill. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Gergen, K. (1968). Personal consistency and the presentation of self. In C. Gordon and K. Gergen (Eds.). The self in social Interaction (pp. 241-250). New York: John Wiley.
  • Goffman, E. (1959) Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
  • Gupta, M. (1985). Interpersonal tension: A two-factor approach to the POX situation. Small Group Behavior, 16, 303-323.
  • Gutman, G., & Knox, R. (1972). Balance, agreement, and attraction in pleasantness, tension, and consistency ratings of hypothetical social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 351-357.
  • Heider, F. (1944).Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 6, 358-374.
  • Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
  • Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
  • Heider, F. (1983). The life of a psychologist: An autobiography. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
  • Heider, F. (2015). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Original work published 1958. Connecticut: Martino Publishing.
  • Insko, C., & Adewole, A. (1979). The role of assumed reciprocation of sentiments and assumed similarity in the production of attraction and agreement effects in P-O-X triads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 790-808.
  • Jordan, N. (1953). Behavioral forces that are a function of attitudes and of cognitive organization. Human Relations, 6, 273-287.
  • Jourard, S. (1968 b). Healthy personality and self-disclosure. In C. Gordon and K.J. Gergen (Eds.). The self in Social Interaction (Vo1. 1, pp. 423—434). New York: Wiley.
  • Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117-125.
  • LaFollette, H., & Graham, G. (1986). Honesty and Intimacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 3-18.
  • Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407-432.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1954-1987). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Mogilner, C., Kamvar, S., Aaker, J. (2011).Theshifting meaning of happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 395-402.
  • Mower-White, C. (1979). Factors affecting balance, agreement and positivity biases in POQ and POX triads. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 129-148.
  • Newcomb, T. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60(6), 393-404.
  • Newcomb, T. (1959). Individual systems of orientation. In S. Koch and S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol.3 , pp. 384-422). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Newcomb, T.M. (1963). Stabilities underlying changes in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 376 -386.
  • Newcomb, T. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, and P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Niebuhr, R. (1960). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics. New York: Simon and Schuster. Original work published 1932.
  • Price, K.O., Harburg, E., & Newcomb, T.M. (1966). Psychological balance in the situation of negative interpersonal attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 265-270.
  • Rodrigues, A. (1965). On the differential effects of some parameters of balance. Journal of Psychology, 61, 241-250.
  • Rodrigues, A., & Newcomb, T. (1980). The balance principle: Its current state and its integrative function in social psychology. Inter American Journal of Psychology, 14, 85-136.
  • Seligman, M. (2003). Positive psychology: Fundamental assumptions. Psychologist, 16(3), 126-127.
  • Seligman, M., & Csikszenmihaly, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
  • Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9, 441-456.
  • Wellens, A., & Thistlewaithe, D. (1971). Analysis of two quantitative theories of cognitive balance. Psychological Review, 78, 141-150.
  • Wiest, W. (1965). A quantitative extension of Heider's theory of cognitive balance applied to interpersonal perception and self-esteem. Psychology Monographs, 79(1), 607.
  • Wondra, J.D., & Ells worth, P.C. (2015). An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences. Psychological Review, 122(3), 411-428.
  • Yu, S., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Maeda, Y. (2017). General need for autonomy and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis of studies in the US and East Asia. Journal of Happiness Studies, pp. 1-20. DOI10.1007/s 10902-017-9898-2.
  • Zajonc, R. (1968). Cognitive theories in social psychology. In G. Lindsey and E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Edison-Wesley.

Abstract Views: 339

PDF Views: 0




  • Moral Interactions and Happiness:A Psychological Perspective

Abstract Views: 339  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mahesh C. Gupta
310 Benfield Drive, Savannah, Georgia, 31406, United States

Abstract


Happiness results, in part, from pleasant interpersonal relationships of which communicative acts and interactions are basic elements. Morality is observed as a foundation of human society and essential for positive interactional outcomes, and thus, for happiness. Interactions that end in mutual benefit to the dyadic members are the basis of happiness and fulfillment. Rationale and validity of this postulate are presented. The falsely perceived benefits of engaging in immoral interactions are based on a lack of understanding of human relations. The concept of mental sanctuary is proposed to explain how humans cope with their private urges and passions and how some people succumb to impulsive and immoral behavior. Research literature associated with Heiderian “balance criterion,” and P-O-X triads is examined to point out the connection of interpersonal tension in the structure of happiness.

Keywords


Happiness, Dyadic Interactions, Systems-Approach, Heiderian Balance.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2018%2Fv9i1%2F173713