Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Median Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity in Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand of Normal Individual


Affiliations
1 Shri K.K. Sheth Physiotherapy College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The cross sectional observational study design is used to study the effect of limb dominance on the median NCV of forearm segment. 30 healthy volunteers (20 Female, 10 Male) with the mean age of 23 yrs (20-26yrs) participated in the study. Edinburgh handedness inventory was used to assess the laterality of subjects. Median NCV for the forearm segment was calculated for each upper limb of 30 subjects. Comparing median NCV between dominant and non-dominant hand of right handed subjects showed no significant difference. Similar results were obtained for left handed subjects. It is concluded that limb dominance has no significant effect on median NCV.

Keywords

Nerve Conduction Velocity, Median Nerve, Handedness
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology, 1Oth ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2001:40-64.

  • Snell RS. Clinical Neuro anatomy for Medical students, 4th ed., Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1997:89-118.

  • Misra UK, Kalita J. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2nd ed., Delhi; Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd., 2006: 1-31.

  • Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in disease of nerve and muscle. 2nd ed., Phiadelphia, F.A.Davis, 1989: 25-110.

  • Dawson GD and Scott JW. The recording of nerve action potentials through skin in man., I Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1949, 12:259-267.

  • O’Sullivan SB, Schimtz TJ. Physical Rehabilitation - Assessment and Treatment, 4th ed., New Delhi; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 2001: 213-256.

  • Soudmand R, Ward LC, Swift TR. Effect of height on nerve conduction velocity, J Neurology, 1982, 32 (4):407-10.

  • Campbell WWJr, Ward LC, Swift TR. Nerve conduction varies inversely with height, Muscle nerve; 1981, 4:520-3.

  • Robinson LR, Rohner DE, Wahl PW, Fujimoto WY, Stolov WC. Influences of height and gender on normal nerve conduction velocity, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1993, 74:1134-8.

  • Rivner MH, Swift TR, Gout BO, Rhodes KP. Toward more rational nerve conduction interpretation: the effect of height, Muscle Nerve, 1990, 13:232-9.

  • Todnem K, Knudsen G, Riise T, Nyland H, Aarli JA. The non linear relationship between nerve conduction velocity and skin temperature, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1989, 52:497-501.

  • Spiegel MH, Johnson EW. Conduction velocity in the proximal and distal segments of the motor fibers of the ulnar nerve of human beings, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1962, 43:57-61.

  • Wagman IH, Lesse H. Maximum conduction velocity of motor fibers of ulnar nerve human subjects of various ages and sizes, J Neurophysiology, 1952, 15:235-242.

  • Bushbacher Rm. Body mass index effect on common nerve conduction study measurements, Muscle Nerve, 1998,21:1398-404.

  • Hala EM. Hammond MC, Derks S. Physical activity: its influence on nerve conduction velocity, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1985, 66:605-9.

  • Shinichi Demura, Nobuhiko Tada, Jinzaburo Matsuzawa, Hajime Mikami, Tetsuhilo Ohuchi, Hiroya Shirane et. al., The influence of gender, Athletic events and Athletic Experience on the subjective dominant hand and the determination of dominant hand based on laterality quotient (LQ) and validity of LQ. J Physiol Anthopal, 2006, 25:321-329. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. April-June 2013, Vol. 7, No. 2 25

  • Tan U. Velocities of motor and sensory nerve conduction are the same for right and left arms in right and left handed normal subjects, Percept Mot Skills, 1985, 60:625-6.

  • Hennenssey WJ, Falco Fj, Braddom RI. Median and ulnar nerve conduction studies: Normative data for young adults, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 75:259-64.

  • Sathiamoorthy SS, Sathiamoorthy A. Limb dominance and motor conduction velocity, Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 1990, 34:51-3.

  • Kaur Jaspreet, Arumugam Markesh. Changes in motor nerve conduction velocity in dominant and non-dominant limbs in right handed and left handed individuals, ] Indian Association 9fPhysiotherapists, 2006, 2:26-27.

  • Kothari CR. Research methodology, 2nd edition, New Delhi, New Age International Pvt Ltd, 2004,31-315.

  • Hicks CM. Research for physiotherapists, 2nd ed., London, Churchill Livingstone: 13-55.

  • Chaudhry SK. Concise Medical Physiology, 2nd ed., Calcutta, New Central Book Agency Pvt Ltd, 1996, 13-23.

  • Retrieved from Wikipedia the free encyclopedia. http://en.wtktpedta.org/wtkt/Actwn-potential

  • Low John, Reed Ann, Dyson Mary. Electrotherapy explained-Principles and practice, 3rd ed., New Delhi, Batterworth-Heinemann, 2000:1-53.

  • Waxman SG. Determinants of conduction velocity in myelinated nerve fibers, Muscle and Nerve, 1980, 3:141-150.

  • Braddom Rl, Schuchmann J. Motor conduction. In: Johnson FW. Practical electromyography, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1989:46.

  • Maynard FM, Stolov WC. Experimental error in determination of nerve conduction velocity, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1972, 53:362-3

  • Melvin JL, Schuchmann JA, Lanese RR. Diagnostic Specificity of motor and sensory nerve conduction variables in carpal tunnel, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1973, 54:69-74.

  • Wiederholf WC. Threshold and conduction velocity in isolated mixed mammalian nerves, Neurology, 1970, 20:347-352.

  • Simpson JA. Fact and fallacy in measurement of conduction velocity in motor nerves, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1964, 27:381-385.

  • Dorthe NJ, Blumenthal TD, Jason DR, Lantiz PE. The use of next-of-kin in assessing handedness. Percept Mot Skills, 1995, 81:203-8.

  • Corey DM, Hurley MM, Foundas AL. Right and left handedness defined: a multivariate approach using hand preference measures, Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol, 2001, 14:144-52.

  • Dragovic M. Towards an improved measure of Edinburg Handedness Inventory: a one-factor congeneric measurement model using confirmatory factor, Laterality, 2004, 9:411-9.

  • Kilshaw D, Annett M. Right and left hand skill I:Effects of age, sex and hand preference showing superior skill in left handers., Br J Psychol, 1983, 74:253-68.

  • Mendell RJ, Nelson DL, Cermark SA. Differential laterality of hand function in right handed and left handed boys, Am J Occup Ther, 1984, 38:114- 20.

  • Tan U. The relation of body height to handedness in male and female right and left handed human subjects, Int J Neurosci., 1992, 63:217-20.

  • Tliggs WJ, Calvaneo R, Levine M, Heaton RK, Heilman KM. Predicting hand preference with performance on motor task, Cortex, 2000, 36: 679- 89.

  • Nalcaci E, Kalaycioglu C, Cicek M, Gene Y. The relationship between handedness and fine motor performance, Cortex, 2001, 37:493-500.

  • Carey JR, Comnick KJ, Lojovich JM, Lindgren BR. Left versus right hand tracking performance by right handed boys and girls: examination of performance asymmetry, Percept Mot Skills, 2003, 97:779-88.

  • Uttner I, Kraft E, Nowak DA, Muller F, Philipp J, Zier dt A et. al., Mirror movements and the role of handedness: isometric grip forces changes, Motor control, 2007, 11:16-28.

  • Falco FJ, Hennessey WJ, Braddom RL, Goldberg G. Standardized nerve conduction studies in the upper limb of the healthy elderly., Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 1992, 71:263-71.

  • Stetson DS, Albers JW, Silverstein BA, Wolfe RA. Effects of age, sex and anthropometric factors on nerve conduction measures, Muscle Nerve, 1992, 15:1095-104.

  • Tan U. Sensory nerve conduction velocities are higher on the left than the right hand and motor conduction is faster on the right hand than left in the right handed normal subjects. Int J Neurosci, 1993, 73:85-91.

  • Hennessey WJ, Falco FJ, Goldberg G, Braddom RL. Gender and arm length: influence on nerve conduction parameters in the upper limb, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 75:265-9. 26 Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. April-June 2013, Vol. 7, No. 2

  • Hyllienmark L, Ludvigsson J, Brismar T. Normal values of nerve conduction in children and adolescent, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1995, 97:208-14.

  • Amer AL-Sheekhlee, Barbara E. Shapiro, David C. Preston, Iatrogenic complications and risks of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography., Muscle Nerve, 2002, 27: 517-526.

  • Eogan M, O’Brien C, Carolan D. Fynes M, O’herlihy C. Median and ulnar nerve conduction in pregnancy., Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2004, 87: 233-236.

  • Schuhfried 0, Angst M, Herceg M, Paternostro- Sluga T. Inter-examiner repeatability of antidromic ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity measurements., Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86:2047-50.


Abstract Views: 662

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison of Median Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity in Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand of Normal Individual

Abstract Views: 662  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Karishma B. Jagad
Shri K.K. Sheth Physiotherapy College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
Bhavesh H. Jagad
Shri K.K. Sheth Physiotherapy College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

Abstract


The cross sectional observational study design is used to study the effect of limb dominance on the median NCV of forearm segment. 30 healthy volunteers (20 Female, 10 Male) with the mean age of 23 yrs (20-26yrs) participated in the study. Edinburgh handedness inventory was used to assess the laterality of subjects. Median NCV for the forearm segment was calculated for each upper limb of 30 subjects. Comparing median NCV between dominant and non-dominant hand of right handed subjects showed no significant difference. Similar results were obtained for left handed subjects. It is concluded that limb dominance has no significant effect on median NCV.

Keywords


Nerve Conduction Velocity, Median Nerve, Handedness

References