Indian Journal of Innovations and Developments

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Microbial Activities and Nutrients Dynamics in Sacred Forest of Meghalaya


Affiliations
1 Union Christian Collage Umiam, Ri-Bhoi-793122, Meghalaya, India
2 Department of Botany, North Eastern Hill University Permanent Campus, Umshing Mawlai Shillong–793 022, Meghalaya, India
3 Ministry of Environment and Forest North Eastern Regional Office Shillong793021, Meghalaya, India
 

Fungi and bacteria populations, urease and phosphatase activities and various physico chemical characteristics of the disturbed and undisturbed forest soils were investigated for a period of one year. We found that fungal and bacterial populations exhibited almost a similar trend of monthly variations in the soils of the disturbed and undisturbed forest stands during the study period. The soil of the undisturbed forest stand harbored higher fungal and bacterial populations as compared to that of the disturbed forest stand. It was observed that the urease and phosphatase activities were slightly higher in the disturbed forest stand than that in the undisturbed forest stand. The urease activity was found to be maximum in the month of June and minimum in the month of January in both the forest stands, whereas, in the case of phosphatase activity the maximum activity was observed in the month of July and minimum in the month of November. Fungal population showed a positive significant correlation with soil temperature (P ≤ 0.01), moisture content (P ≤ 0.01), organic carbon (P ≤ 0.05), available phosphorus (P ≤ 0.05) and exchangeable potassium (P ≤ 0.01) and negatively significant with pH (P ≤ 0.05) in both the forest stands, however, a significant positive correlation was found between the fungal population and total nitrogen (P ≤ 0.05) in undisturbed forest stand only. The one way analysis of variation of fungal, bacterial populations and phosphatase activity showed significant variation (P ≤ 0.05) at the three different depths between the two study sites.

Keywords

Activities, Bacteria, Disturbed, Enzymes, Forest, Fungi, Phosphatase, Undisturbed, Urease
User
Notifications

  • Allen SE, Grinshaw HM, Parkinson JA and Quarmby C (1974) Chemical Analysis of Ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

  • Allsopp D, Colwell RR and Hawksworth DL (eds) (1995) Microbial diversity and ecosystem function. CAB International, Wallingford.

  • Anderson JM and Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A handbook of Ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

  • Appiah MR and Thomas RL (1982) Inositol phosphate and organic phosphorus contents and phosphatase activity of some Canadian and Ghanaian soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 62, 31-38.

  • Balasubramanium A, Shantaram MV, Sardesh Pande JS and Rangaswami G (1972) Studies on certain microbiological properties of old permanent manurial plots at Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, Madras. Agric. J. 59, 443-448.

  • Beri V, Goswami KP, Brar SS (1978) Urease activity and its michaelis constant for soil systems. Plant and Soil, 49, 105-115.

  • Bremner JM and Mulvaney CS (1978) Urease activity in soils. In: Burns R.G (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London, pp. 149-197.

  • Brown AHF (1974) Nutrient cycles in oakwood ecosystems in N.W. England. In: The British Oak (M.G. Morris and F.H. Perring, Eds), p.144. Classey for Botanical Society of the British Isles.

  • Chhonkar PK and Tarafdar JC (1984) Accumulation of phosphatases in soils. Journal of Indian Social Soil Science, 32, 266-272.

  • Clarholm M and Rosswall T (1980) Biomass and turnover of bacteria in a forest soil and a peat. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 12, 19-57.

  • Cosgrove DJ (1967) Metabolism of organic phosphates in soil. In Soil Biochemistry Vol.I, (AD Mc Laren and GH Paterson, Eds), pp. 216-228. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  • Dalal RC (1975) Urease activity in some Trinidad soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 7, 5-8.

  • Dilly O and Nannipieri P (2001) Response of ATP content, respiration rate and enzyme activites in an arable and a forest soils to nutrient additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34, 64-72.

  • Dkhar MS (1983) Studies on ecology and edaphic microbial populations and their activities in maize fields. Ph.D. Thesis. North Eastern Hill University, Shillong. pp 107 -124.

  • Dkhar MS and Mishra RR (1983) Dehydrogenase and urease activities of maize (Zea mays L.) field soils. Plant and Soil, 70, 327-333.

  • Gonzalez CS and Fuente MA (1984) Microbial modulation of soil urease. An Edafol. Agrobiol. 43, 479-490.

  • Hattori H (1988) Microbial activities in soil amended with sewage sludges. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 34, 221-232.

  • Hawksworth DL and Colwel RR (1992) Microbial Diversity 21: biodiversity amongst microorganisms and its relevance. Biodiversity Conserv., 1, 221-226.

  • Insam H, Parkinson D and Domsch KH (1989) Influence of macroclimate on soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem., 21, 211-221.

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi, Prentice Hall India (P) Limited.

  • Jenkinson DS and Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. Soil Biochemistry, 5, 415-471.

  • Jha DK, Sharma GD and Mishra RR (1992) Soil microbial population number and enzyme activities in relation to altitude and forest degradation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 24, 761-767.

  • Johnson LF and Curl AE (1972) Method for the research on Ecology of soil borne plant pathogen. Burgess publishing company. Pp. 247, Minneapolis.

  • Kaiser EA, Mueller T, Joergensen RG, Insam H and Heinemeyer O (1992) Evaluation of methods to estimate the soil microbial biomass and the relationships with soil texture and organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem., 24, 675-683.

  • Lynch JM and Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil, 129, 1-10.

  • Martin JP (1950) Use of acid rose Bengal and Streptomycin in plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Science, 69, 215-232.

  • McGarity JW and Myers MC (1967) A survey of urease activity in soil of Northern New South Wales. Plant and Soil, 27, 217-238.

  • Nannipieri P, Pedrazzini F, Aceara PG and Piovaneus C (1979) Changes in amino acids, enzymes activities and biomass during soil microbial growth. Soil Science, 11, 26-34. 29.Neal JR (1973) Influence of selected grasses and herbs on soil phosphatase activity. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 53,119-121.

  • O’Toole P, Morgan MA and McGarry SJ (1985) A comparative study if urease activities in pasture and tillage soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 16, 759-774. 3 1.Ojeniyi SO (1980) Nutrient status of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium treated coffee plots. Plant and Soil, 56, 175-179.

  • Palma RM and Conti ME (1990) Urease activity in Argentine soils: Fields studies and influence of sample treatment. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 22, 105-108.

  • Pancholy SK and Rice EL (1973) Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession; amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 37, 47-50.

  • Paul EA and Clark FE (1989) Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. pp. 273.

  • Pietikainen J and Ftitze H (1995) Clear cutting and subscribed burning in coniferous forest: comparison of effects on soil fungal and total microbial biomass, respiration activity and nitrification. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 27, 101-109.

  • Rao DLN and Ghai SK (1985) Urease and dehydrogenase activity of alkali and reclaimed soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 661-665.

  • Rastin N, Rosenplanter K and Huttermann A (1988) Seasonal variation of enzyme activity and their dependence on certain soil factors in a beech forest soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 20, 637-642.

  • Sahrawat KL (1984) Effect of temperature and moisture on urease activity in semi arid tropical soils. Plant and Soil, 78, 401-408.

  • Sahrawat KL (1983) Relatonship between soil urease activity and other properties of tropical wetland rice soils. Fertility Research, 4, 145 -150. 40.Schmidt G, Laskowski Sr M (1961) Phosphate ester cleavage (Survey). In: Boyer PD, Lardy H, Myrback K (eds) The enzymes, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 3-35.

  • Selvaraj KV and Rangaswamy PP (1978) Effect of moisture regimes and soil depth on microbial populations. Food Farming Agric., 10: 178-179.

  • Singh SS (2002) Studies on microbial communities and their activities in degraded and undegraded forest soils of Arunachal Pradesh. Ph.D Thesis. North Eastern Hill University Shillong India.

  • Skujins J (1976) Extracellular enzyme in soil. CRC Critical. Review in Microbiology, 4, 383-421.

  • Speir TW (1977) Studies on climosequences of soils in tussock grasslands. II. Urease, phosphatase and sulphate activities of top soils and their relationships with other properties including plant available sulphur. NZJ Science, 20, 159-166.

  • Tabatabai MA (1977) Effect of trace elements on urease activity in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2, 9-13.

  • Tabatabai MA and Bremner JM (1969) Use of pnitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1, 301-307.

  • Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biological Reviews, 67, 321-35.


Abstract Views: 312

PDF Views: 64




  • Microbial Activities and Nutrients Dynamics in Sacred Forest of Meghalaya

Abstract Views: 312  |  PDF Views: 64

Authors

M. Dkhar
Union Christian Collage Umiam, Ri-Bhoi-793122, Meghalaya, India
M. S. Dkhar
Department of Botany, North Eastern Hill University Permanent Campus, Umshing Mawlai Shillong–793 022, Meghalaya, India
H. Tynsong
Ministry of Environment and Forest North Eastern Regional Office Shillong793021, Meghalaya, India

Abstract


Fungi and bacteria populations, urease and phosphatase activities and various physico chemical characteristics of the disturbed and undisturbed forest soils were investigated for a period of one year. We found that fungal and bacterial populations exhibited almost a similar trend of monthly variations in the soils of the disturbed and undisturbed forest stands during the study period. The soil of the undisturbed forest stand harbored higher fungal and bacterial populations as compared to that of the disturbed forest stand. It was observed that the urease and phosphatase activities were slightly higher in the disturbed forest stand than that in the undisturbed forest stand. The urease activity was found to be maximum in the month of June and minimum in the month of January in both the forest stands, whereas, in the case of phosphatase activity the maximum activity was observed in the month of July and minimum in the month of November. Fungal population showed a positive significant correlation with soil temperature (P ≤ 0.01), moisture content (P ≤ 0.01), organic carbon (P ≤ 0.05), available phosphorus (P ≤ 0.05) and exchangeable potassium (P ≤ 0.01) and negatively significant with pH (P ≤ 0.05) in both the forest stands, however, a significant positive correlation was found between the fungal population and total nitrogen (P ≤ 0.05) in undisturbed forest stand only. The one way analysis of variation of fungal, bacterial populations and phosphatase activity showed significant variation (P ≤ 0.05) at the three different depths between the two study sites.

Keywords


Activities, Bacteria, Disturbed, Enzymes, Forest, Fungi, Phosphatase, Undisturbed, Urease

References