Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Workplace Bullying:A Noxious Treatment for Employee Mental Health


Affiliations
1 Department of Psyehology Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Psyehology MMV, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department ofPsyehology Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Workplace harassment atfects the light, passion, humor, personality and others intellectual properties of many employees, until recently it has been relatively ignored in the ocean of organizational psychology literature. First, the aim of this study was investigate the relationship between workplace bullying and mental health. Secondly, etfect of workplace bullying behaviour on employee behaviour and his deviant behaviour in social relation. Health harming and potential antecedents and consequences also focuses hidden and troubles features of victims. After deep analysis of review show personal construct, individual differences, environmental factor and culture was negatively significant today to night behaviour of employee well-being. Female, disable, patient, aged person, black skin people, third gender and dwarf or all other people found mainly as a victim from previous research. Poor social, work culture, quality, features of work, Rankism and environment were showing negatively correlated with intentional inflicts bullying in organization. Bullying and aggression had similar effects on the feelings of stress, mental health, and job satisfaction of both men and women. Most of the studies focus on only in employee or organizational scenario due to most of part of human behaviour has in dark. Counselling, intervention, prevention, policy, rule, laws have some issue who is not prescribed by previous studies in effective ways.

Keywords

Aggression, Intentional Inflicts Workplace Bullying, Rankism.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adoric, V.C., &Kvartuc, T. (2002). Effects of mobbing on justice beliefs and adjustment. European Psychologist, H, 87-111.

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The-nature of prejudice. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.

  • Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). Arelational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(6)., 1023-1034.

  • Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian .Journal of Administrative Sciences, 74(2), 126-140.

  • Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. InR. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 3-38). New York: Hem.

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575-582.

  • Bjdrkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hielt-Bdck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees.AggressiveBehavior,20(y), 173-184.

  • Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20(1), 27-33.

  • Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim's perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 998-1012.

  • Brodsky,C.M. (1976a). Theharassed worker.DC health and Co.

  • Cortina, L. M.,Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64-80.

  • Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 335349.

  • De Lange, A. H., Paris, T. W.,Kompier, M. A.,Houtman, I. L., &Bongers, P. M. (2005). Different mechanisms to explain the reversed effects of mental health on work characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 31, 3-14.

  • Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331-351.

  • Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower,20(-2), 16-27.

  • Einarsen, S. (2000a). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379-401.

  • Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2003a.). Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice(pp. 127-144). London, Taylor andFrancis.

  • Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996a). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185-201.

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire-revised. WorkandStress, 23(1), 24-44.

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. R. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994a). Bullying andharassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(4), 381-401.

  • Frone, M. R. (1998). Predictors of work injuries among employed adolescents. .Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 565-576.

  • Fuller, R.W. (2004). Some bodies and nobodies: Overcoming the abuse of rank (No. 132). New Society Pub.

  • Frone, M. R. (2000). Interpersonal conflict at work and psychological outcomes: Testing a model among young workers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 246-255.

  • Harvey, M. G., Buckley, M. R., Heames, J. T., Zinko, R., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2007). A bully as an archetypal destructive leader. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 74(2), 117-129.

  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(5), 426-433.

  • Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. L. (2000a). Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Manchester: Manchester School ofManagement, UMIST.

  • Hogh, A., & Dofradottir, A. (2001). Coping with bullying in the workplace. European Journal of Workand Organizational Psychology, 79(4),485-495.

  • Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2006). Workplace bullying in nursing: towards a more critical organisational perspective. Nursing Inquiry, 13(2), 118-126.

  • Hutchinson, M., Wilkes, L., Jackson, D., & Vickers, M. H. (2010). Integrating individual, work group and organizational factors: Testing a multidimensional model of bullying in the nursing workplace. .Journal of Nursing Management, 73(2), 173-181.

  • Janoff-Bullman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. Toward a new Psychology of trauma. New York: The Free Press.

  • Keashly, L., & Jagatic, K. (2000, August). The mature, extent, and impact of emotional abuse in the -workplace: Results of a state wide survey. Presentado en el Annual Meeting of the Academy ofManagement, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • Kivimaki, M., Virtanen, M., Vartia, M., Elovainio, M., Vahtera, J., & Keltikangas- Jarvinen, L. (2003). Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(10), 779-783.

  • Lewis, D., & Rayner, C. (2003). Bullying and human resource management: A wolf in sheep's clothing? In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, andD. Zapf (Eds.),Bullying and emotional abuse in the -workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 370-382). London: Taylor andFrancis.

  • Leymann,H. (9^6a). Mobbing psychological violence at-work places/mobbing. Lund: Student litterateur.

  • Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119-126.

  • Leymann, H. (1992). Fran mobbning til utslagning i arbetslivet: From bullying to expulsion_from-workinglife. Stockholm, Sweden:Publica.

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165-184.

  • Leymann, H., & Gustafsson, A. (1996). Mobbing at work and the development of posttraumatic stress disorders. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 251-275.

  • Leymann, H., & Tallgren, U. (1989). Undersokning av frekvensen av vuxenmobbning innom SSAB med et nytt frageformular: An investigation of the frequency of bullying in SSAB with anew questionnaire. Manniska, Miljo, 7,3-12.

  • Liefooghe, A. P. D., & Olafsson, R. (1998). Critical incident technique and bullying. In C. Rayner, M. Sheehan, and M. Barker (Eds.), Bullying at work, 1998 research update conference: Proceedings (pp. 28-33). Staffordshire University, Stafford.

  • McClelland, D. C. (1977). The impact of power motivation training on alcoholics. Journal of Studies o-n Alcohol, 55(1), 142-144.

  • Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2001). Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates. European Journal of Workand Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 393-413.

  • Niedl,K. (1995). Mobbing/buHyingatthe-workplace. Munich: RainerHampp.

  • Quine, L. (1999a). Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 575(7178), 228-232.

  • Quine, L. (2003). Workplace bullying, psychological distress, and job satisfaction in junior doctors. Cambridge Quarterl-y of HealthcareEthics, 72(1), 91-101.

  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, andphysical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356-367.

  • Spector, P. E., & O'Connell, B. J. (1994). The contribution of individual dispositions to the subsequent perceptions of job stressors and job strains. .Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67,1-11.

  • Sutela, H., & Lehto, A. M. (1998). Henkinen vakivalta on koko tyoyhteison ongelma. Bullying is a problem of the whole work unit. Hyvinvointikatsaus, 3,18-24.

  • Taylor, S. E. (1991a). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Ps-ychological Bulletin, 770(1), 67-85.

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.

  • Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2004a). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(5),561-592.

  • Vartia, M. (1991, August). Bullying at workplaces. Towards the 21st Century. Work in the 1990s. Proceedings of an International Symposium on Future Trends in the Changing Working Life, pp. 13-15.

  • Vartia, M. A. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 27(1), 63-69.

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative effectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3),465.

  • Zapf,D., Escartin, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2011). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice,2,75-106.

  • Zapf,D.,Knorz, C., &Kulla,M. (1996b). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European .Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215-237.


Abstract Views: 291

PDF Views: 1




  • Workplace Bullying:A Noxious Treatment for Employee Mental Health

Abstract Views: 291  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Amit Kumar Vishwakarma
Department of Psyehology Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Visheshta Mishra
Department of Psyehology MMV, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Sandeep Kumar
Department ofPsyehology Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Workplace harassment atfects the light, passion, humor, personality and others intellectual properties of many employees, until recently it has been relatively ignored in the ocean of organizational psychology literature. First, the aim of this study was investigate the relationship between workplace bullying and mental health. Secondly, etfect of workplace bullying behaviour on employee behaviour and his deviant behaviour in social relation. Health harming and potential antecedents and consequences also focuses hidden and troubles features of victims. After deep analysis of review show personal construct, individual differences, environmental factor and culture was negatively significant today to night behaviour of employee well-being. Female, disable, patient, aged person, black skin people, third gender and dwarf or all other people found mainly as a victim from previous research. Poor social, work culture, quality, features of work, Rankism and environment were showing negatively correlated with intentional inflicts bullying in organization. Bullying and aggression had similar effects on the feelings of stress, mental health, and job satisfaction of both men and women. Most of the studies focus on only in employee or organizational scenario due to most of part of human behaviour has in dark. Counselling, intervention, prevention, policy, rule, laws have some issue who is not prescribed by previous studies in effective ways.

Keywords


Aggression, Intentional Inflicts Workplace Bullying, Rankism.

References