Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Prognathism as Race Appraisal Criterion in a Study of 60 Indian Crania of Known Sex Using Metric and Non-metric Modes - Assessment of Methodology


Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy Pramukhswami Medical College Karamsad, Gujarat 388325, India
2 Department of Anatomy Maharishi Markhandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Race assessment is one of the essential components in establishing identification of an individual from human skeletal remains. The skull stands out as the most reliable amongst skeleton for determining racial affinity, both morphologically and osteometrically. Inferring from observations related to morphological indicators depends largely upon the experience of the observer while adequate level of methodological standardization, is an essential precondition at the outset. Variability with regard to prognathism among members of all major racial groups is more a rule than exception. Assessment of race, using metric studies vis-à-vis morphological indicators was put to comparison and tested for reliability of methodology in the present study, subsequent to estimation of prognathism by both methods on skulls of 60 Indian individuals of known sex (30 of either). The prognathism was estimated (1) nonmetrically - by inspection using casts prepared and standardized by Australian National University and (2) metrically - by calculating Gnathic Index (as defined by Breathnach, 1965). The results of both studies revealed that of a total of 60 Indian skulls studied, 50 skulls were found to have orthognathic profile (Gnathic Index < 98) by Metric Study in contrast to Non-Metric Study where only 16 skulls showed 'Small' Grade prognathism. Subsequent to chi-square test, the difference between Metric and Non-Metric study was significant (X2 = 38.922559). Consequently it can be stated that determination of prognathism applying metric studies is superior in reliability compared to morphological indicators using casts.

Keywords

Craniometry, Race Determination, Gnathic-index, Human Identification.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Birkby WH. An evaluation of race and sex identification from cranial measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 1966; 24: 21-27.

  • Breathnach AS. The skull: general account. In: Frazer’s anatomy of the human skeleton. 6th ed. London: J and A Churchill, 1965; p 180.

  • Buchner A. The identification of human remains. International Dental Journal 1985; 35: 307-311.

  • Burris BG, Harris EF. Identification of race and sex from palate dimensions. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43(5): 959-963.

  • El-Najjar MY, McWilliams KR. Anthropometry. In: Forensic anthropology. The structure, morphology, and variation of the human bone and dentition. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1978; p 107.

  • Giles E, Elliot O. Race identification from cranial measurements. J Forensic Sci 1962; 7: 147-157.

  • Gill GW, Fisher JW, Jr and Zeimens GM. A pioneer burial near the historic Bordeaux Trading Post Plains Anthropologist 1984; 29: 229-238.

  • Gill W, Gilbert BM. Race identification from the midfacial skeleton: American blacks and whites. In: Gill GW, Rhine JS(eds). Skeletal attribution of race. Maxwell Mus Anthropol Papers 4.Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, 1990; p 47-53.

  • Hooton EA. Heredity and Race. In: Up from the ape, 1st ed. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas, 1965; p 499-607.

  • Hooton EA. The anthropology of the individual. In: Up from the ape, 1st ed. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas, 1965; p 745-747.

  • Howells WW. Cranial variation in man. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 67. Harvard University, Cambridge Massachussets, 1973; p 169-171.

  • Kerley ER. Forensic anthropology. In: Tedeschi CG, William G. Eckert, Luke G. Tedeschi, editors. Forensic medicine a study in trauma and environmental hazards. Vol. 2 Physical trauma. London: WB Saunders, 1977; p 1108-1111

  • Larnach SL, Macintosh NWG. The craniology of the aborigines of Coastal New South Wales. The Oceania Monographs No.13, 1966; p 32.

  • Modi NJ. Personal identity. In: Medical Jurisprudence and toxicology. 20th ed. Bombay: N.M. Tripathi, 1977; p 21.

  • Moore Jansen PM, Ousley SD, Jantz RL. Data collection procedures for forensic skeletal material, 1994; p 45-51.

  • Novotny V, Iscan MY, Loth SR. Morphologic and osteometric assessment of age, sex and race from the skull. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP, editors. Forensic analysis of the skull. New York: Wiley- Liss, 1993; p 76-80.


Abstract Views: 215

PDF Views: 0




  • Prognathism as Race Appraisal Criterion in a Study of 60 Indian Crania of Known Sex Using Metric and Non-metric Modes - Assessment of Methodology

Abstract Views: 215  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sumati
Department of Anatomy Pramukhswami Medical College Karamsad, Gujarat 388325, India
V. V. G. Patnaik
Department of Anatomy Maharishi Markhandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India

Abstract


Race assessment is one of the essential components in establishing identification of an individual from human skeletal remains. The skull stands out as the most reliable amongst skeleton for determining racial affinity, both morphologically and osteometrically. Inferring from observations related to morphological indicators depends largely upon the experience of the observer while adequate level of methodological standardization, is an essential precondition at the outset. Variability with regard to prognathism among members of all major racial groups is more a rule than exception. Assessment of race, using metric studies vis-à-vis morphological indicators was put to comparison and tested for reliability of methodology in the present study, subsequent to estimation of prognathism by both methods on skulls of 60 Indian individuals of known sex (30 of either). The prognathism was estimated (1) nonmetrically - by inspection using casts prepared and standardized by Australian National University and (2) metrically - by calculating Gnathic Index (as defined by Breathnach, 1965). The results of both studies revealed that of a total of 60 Indian skulls studied, 50 skulls were found to have orthognathic profile (Gnathic Index < 98) by Metric Study in contrast to Non-Metric Study where only 16 skulls showed 'Small' Grade prognathism. Subsequent to chi-square test, the difference between Metric and Non-Metric study was significant (X2 = 38.922559). Consequently it can be stated that determination of prognathism applying metric studies is superior in reliability compared to morphological indicators using casts.

Keywords


Craniometry, Race Determination, Gnathic-index, Human Identification.

References