Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Firms' Aggressiveness and Respective Performance:An Empirical Study under Pakistani Scenery


Affiliations
1 CECOS University, Peshawar Pakistan, Pakistan
 

The study investigates capital structure of all non-financial listed firms on Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) for the period of 2008 to 2014. To test the relation between firm aggressive behavior and its performance, the study uses exponential generalized least square regression by employing control variables. Levin, Hadri and ADF test are used to know the stationarity of data. Furthermore different diagnostic tests like VIF, Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity and Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects are used to check the data normality. Results of the study reveals that financial managers’ aggressiveness regarding financial policy is negatively, while aggressiveness regarding investment policy is positively effecting the firm’s performance. The study also found that with the passage of time, firms in Pakistan have been devastating their performance. That’s why study found negative relation between firms’ age and dependent variables.

Keywords

Capital Structure, Firm’s Performance, ROI, ROA.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akhtar, S. (2005). The determinants of capital structure for Australian multinational and domestic corporations. The Australian Graduate School of Management, 30, 321-341.
  • Akhtar, S. and Oliver, B. (2009). Determinants of capital structure for Japanese multinational and domestic corporations. International Review of Finance, 9, 1-26.
  • Allen, D. E. (1993). The pecking order hypothesis: Australian evidence. Applied Financial Economics, 3(2), 101-112.
  • Berle and Means, (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Volume 1, Issue 4, 36-47 ISSN 2291-4471.
  • Deloof, M. (2003). Does working capital management affect profitability of Belgian firms?. Journal of business finance & Accounting, 30(3‐4), 573-588.
  • Eljelly AMA (2004). Liquidity Profitability Tradeoff: An Empirical Investigation in an Emerging Market. International Journal of Commerce and Management 14(2): 48-61.
  • Ezeoha, A. E. (2008). Firm size and corporate financial leverage choice in a developing economy. The Journal of Risk Finance, 9(4), 351-364.
  • Filbeck, G., and Krueger, T. M. (2005). An analysis of working capital management results across industries. American Journal of Business, 20(2), 11-20.
  • Gupta, M. C. (1969). The effect of size, growth, and industry on the financial structure of manufacturing companies. The Journal of Finance, 24(3), 517-529.
  • Gupta, M. C., and Huefner, R. J. (1972). A cluster analysis study of financial ratios and industry characteristics. Journal of Accounting Research, 77-95.
  • Harris, M., and Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297-355.
  • Hausman, J. A., & Taylor, W. E. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1377-1398.
  • Jensen M. and Meckling W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
  • Johnson, William A., 1970, Default administration of corporate trust indentures: The general nature of the trustee’s responsibility and events of default, St. Louis University Law Journal 15, 203-236.
  • Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007), "The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions", Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 8 pp.56-71.
  • La Rocca, M. (2007). The influence of corporate governance on the relation between capital structure and value. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 7(3), 312-325.
  • Lamberson, M. (1995). Changes in working capital of small firms in relation to changes in economic activity. American Journal of Business, 10(2), 45-50.
  • Lawal, A. I. (2014). Capital structure and the value of the firm: evidence from the Nigeria banking industry. Journal of Accounting and Management JAM vol, 4(1).
  • Lazaridis I and D Tryfonidis (2006). Relationship between Working Capital Management and Profitability of Listed Companies in the Athens Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis 19 (1): 26-35.
  • Harford, J., S. Mansi, and W. Maxwell, 2005, corporate governance and firms’ cash holdings, working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review, 48(3), 261-297.
  • Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American economic review, 53(3), 433-443.
  • Murugesu, T. (2013). Effect of debt on corporate profitability (Listed Hotel Companies Sri Lanka).European Journal of Business and Management, 5(30), 13-18.
  • Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The journal of finance, 39(3), 574-592.
  • Nazir, M. S., & Afza, T. (2009). Impact of aggressive working capital management policy on firms' profitability. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 15(8), 19.
  • Ozkan, A. (2001). Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long run target: evidence from UK company panel data. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(1‐2), 175-198.
  • Padachi, K. (2006). Trends in working capital management and its impact on firms’ performance: an analysis of Mauritian small manufacturing firms. International Review of business research papers, 2(2), 45-58.
  • Pinches, G. E., Mingo, K. A., and Caruthers, J. K. (1973). The stability of financial patterns in industrial organizations. The Journal of Finance, 28(2), 389-396.
  • Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure: Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
  • Shah, A., and Khan, S. 2007. Determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Pakistani panel data. International review of business research papers, 3(4), 265-282.
  • Smith MB and E Begemann (1997). Measuring Association between Working Capital and Return on Investment. South Africa Journal of Business Management 28(1): 1-5
  • Soenen L A (1993), “Cash Conversion Cycle and Corporate Profitability”, Journal of Cash Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 53-58.
  • Teruel P J G and Solano P M (2005), “Effects of Working Capital Management on SME Profitability”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 164-177.
  • Weinraub, H. J., & Visscher, S. (1998). Industry practice relating to aggressive conservative working capital policies. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decision, 11(2), 11-18.
  • Zhang, Y., and Toppinen, A. (2011). Internationalization and financial performance in the global forest industry. International Forestry Review, 13(1), 96-105.

Abstract Views: 236

PDF Views: 109




  • Firms' Aggressiveness and Respective Performance:An Empirical Study under Pakistani Scenery

Abstract Views: 236  |  PDF Views: 109

Authors

Obaid Ur Rehman
CECOS University, Peshawar Pakistan, Pakistan

Abstract


The study investigates capital structure of all non-financial listed firms on Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) for the period of 2008 to 2014. To test the relation between firm aggressive behavior and its performance, the study uses exponential generalized least square regression by employing control variables. Levin, Hadri and ADF test are used to know the stationarity of data. Furthermore different diagnostic tests like VIF, Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity and Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects are used to check the data normality. Results of the study reveals that financial managers’ aggressiveness regarding financial policy is negatively, while aggressiveness regarding investment policy is positively effecting the firm’s performance. The study also found that with the passage of time, firms in Pakistan have been devastating their performance. That’s why study found negative relation between firms’ age and dependent variables.

Keywords


Capital Structure, Firm’s Performance, ROI, ROA.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15759/ijek%2F2017%2Fv5i1%2F190277