International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Use of ICT Platforms to Promote Knowledge Exchange in Project-Based Organisations


Affiliations
1 Magister Management Program, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
 

This study aims to investigate the use of information and communication technology (ICT) to support knowledge exchange in project-based organisations. The primary ICT tool investigated in this research is WhatsApp, a messaging application that has been widely used since its introduction. An ethnographic case study method was utilised to analyse qualitative data collected from interviews and focus group discussions. Three projects in an Indonesian university with a duration ranging from 8 months to 2 years were examined as object of investigations. Broadly, the findings show that ICT tools are generally useful in supporting knowledge exchange, which ultimately positively affects project performance. The project teams relied on WhatsApp for the success of the projects. Although face-to-face meetings were rare, team communication was highly intensive, supported by WhatsApp. In addition, managers are encouraged to promote knowledge exchange between team members. Through knowledge exchange, there will be knowledge development, which facilitates the invention of new techniques and methods for promoting project success. The most prominent findings are presented using direct quotations to provide first hand insight from the field. At the end of the paper, recommendations regarding what project managers should do during and after the project has been completed are presented. The recommendations are classified based on the knowledge management life cycle, representing a structured method to manage knowledge in project-based organisations.

Keywords

Knowledge Exchange, Project Management, Knowledge Management, Information Technology, Project-Based Organisation.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Acton, B. & Koum, J., 2014. WhatsApp blog. Available at: http://blog.whatsapp.com [Accessed February 4, 2016].

  • Adenfelt, M., 2010. Exploring the performance of transnational projects: shared knowledge, coordination and communication. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), pp.529–538.

  • Aggarwal, P. & O’Brien, C.L., 2008. Social loafing on group projects: structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education.

  • Ahad, A.D. & Lim, S.M.A., 2014. Convenience or Nuisance?: The “WhatsApp” Dilemma. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(October), pp.189–196.

  • Alabdulkareem, S.A., 2015. Exploring the use and the impacts of social media on teaching and learning science in Saudi. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, pp.213–224.

  • Almeida, M.V. & Soares, A.L., 2014. Knowledge sharing in project-based organizations : Overcoming the informational limbo. International Journal of Information Management, 34, pp.770–779.

  • Barreau, D., 2008. The persistence of behavior and form in the organization of per- sonal information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), pp.307–317.

  • Bartsch, V., Ebers, M. & Maurer, I., 2013. Learning in project-based organisations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), pp.239–251.

  • Begel, A., DeLine, R. & Zimmermann, T., 2010. Social media for software engineering2. In Proc. FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research FoSER ’10. Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA: ACM New York, pp. 33–37.

  • Boh, W.F., 2007. Mechanism for sharing knowledge in project-based organisations. Information and Organisation, 17(1), pp.27–58.

  • Budden, C.B. et al., 2011. Managing the evolution of a revolution: Marketing implications of Internet media usage among college students. College Teaching Methods and Styles Journal, 3(3), p.5—10.

  • Caniëls, M.C.J. & Bakens, R.J.J.M., 2012. The effects of Project Management Information Systems on decision making in a multi project environment. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), pp.162–175.

  • Carrillo, P. et al., 2004. Knowledge management in UK construction: Strategies, resources and barriers. Project Management Journal, 35(1), pp.46–56.

  • Carrillo, P.M. et al., 2006. A knowledge transfer framework: the PFI context. Construction Management and Economics, 24(10), pp.1045–1056.

  • Chang, H.H. & Chuang, S., 2011. Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), p.9.

  • Chiocchio, F., 2007. Project team performance: A study of electronic task and coordination communication. Project Management Journal, 38(1), pp.97–109.

  • Choo, C.W., 1991. Towards an informational model of organizations. The Canadian Journal of Information Science, 16(3), pp.32–62.

  • Crawford, L., 2002. Profiling the competent project manager. In In D. P. Slevine, D. I. Cleland, & J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The frontiers of project management research. Newtown Square, PA.: Project Management Institute., pp. 151–176.

  • Detlor, B., 2010. Information management. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), pp.103–108.

  • Drake, T.M. et al., 2015. WhatsApp with patient data transmitted via instant messaging? The American Journal of Surgery, 211(1), pp.300–301.

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. & Jackson, P., 2012. Management research, 4th Edition, Sage Publications, Inc., London, United Kingdom.

  • Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp.532–550.

  • Fong, P., 2003. Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: An empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships. International Journal of Project Management, 21(7), pp.479–486.

  • Giardano, V. et al., 2015. WhatsApp messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial fractures: Inter- and intra-observer agreement study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 54, pp.141–148.

  • Gunnlaugsdottir, J., 2003. Seek and you will find, share and you will benefit: Organising knowledge using groupware systems. International Journal of Information Management, 23(5), pp.363–380.

  • Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K. & Gemuenden, H.G., 2004. Interteam coordination, project com- mitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: a longitudinal study. Organisational Science, 15(1), pp.38–55.

  • Hofstede, G. et al., 1990. Measuring organisational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.286–316.

  • Jackson, P. & Klobas, J., 2008. Building knowledge in projects: A practical application of social constructivism to information systems development. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), pp.329–337.

  • Johannessen, J.A. & Olsen, B., 2011. Projects as communicating systems: Creating a culture of innovation and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), pp.30–37.

  • Jonhston, M.. et al., 2015. Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. The American Journal of Surgery, 209(1), pp.45–51.

  • Juarez-Ramirez, R., Pimienta-Romo, R. & Ocegueda-Miramontes, V., 2013. Supporting the software development process using social media: Experiences with student projects. 2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops, pp.656–661.

  • Karim, N. & Hussein, R., 2008. Managers’ perception of information man- agement and the role of information and knowledge managers: The Malaysian perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 28(2), pp.114–127.

  • Koskinen, K.U., Pihlanto, P. & Vanaranta, H., 2003. Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), pp.281–290.

  • Kotlarsky, J. & Oshri, I., 2005. Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Informational Systems, 14(1), pp.37–48.

  • Kruger, C. & Johnson, R.D., 2010. Information management as an enabler of knowledge management maturity: A South African perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), pp.57–67.

  • Liu, J., Meng, F. & Fellows, R., 2015. An exploratory study of understanding project risk management from the perspective of national culture. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), pp.564–575.

  • Liu, P.L., Chen, W.C. & Tsai, C.H., 2004. An empirical study on the correlation between knowledge management capability and competitiveness in Taiwan’s industries. Technovation, 24(12), pp.971–977.

  • Lynn, G.S. & Reilly, R.R., 2000. Measuring team performance. Research Technology Management, 43(2), pp.48–56.

  • Mehta, N., Hall, D. & Byrd, T., 2014. Information technology and knowledge in software development teams : The role of project uncertainty. Information & Management, 51, pp.417–429.

  • Mickan, S. & Rodger, S., 2000. Characteristics of effective teams: A literature review. Australian Health Review, 23(3), pp.201–208.

  • Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S., 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242–266.

  • Nonaka, I., 1991. The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), p.96.

  • Pemsel, S. & Wiewiora, A., 2013. Project management office a knowledge broker in project-based organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), pp.31–42.

  • Petruzzi, M. & De Benedittis, M., 2015. WhatsApp: A telemedicine platform for facilitating remote oral medicine consultation and improving clinical examinations. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology.

  • Prencipe, A. & Tell, F., 2001. Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), pp.1373–1394.

  • Project Management Institute, 2013. PMBOK Guide 5th ed., Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc.

  • Rooke, C.N. et al., 2010. Using the physical properties of artefacts to manage through-life knowledge flows in the built environment: an initial exploration. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), pp.601–613.

  • van Rooyen, A., 2015. Distance education accounting students’ perceptions of social media integration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, pp.444–450.

  • Sage, D.J., Dainty, A.R.J. & Brookes, N.J., 2010. Who reads the project file? Exploring the power effects of knowledge tools in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), pp.629–639.

  • Shachaf, P., 2008. Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 45(2), pp.131–142.

  • Shenhar, A., 2001. One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), pp.394–414.

  • Stefanidis, D. et al., 2015. Research priorities for multi-institutional colloborative research in surgical education. The American Journal of Surgery, 209(1), pp.52–58.

  • Sultan, A.J., 2014. Addiction to mobile text messaging applications is nothing to “lol” about. The Social Science Journal, 51(1), pp.57–69.

  • Turner, J., 2010. How to calculate the ROI of your social media campaign. http://mashable.com/2010/11/05/calculate-roi-social-media/#aCevMm86QZqd. Available at: http://mashable.com/2010/11/05/calculate-roi-social-media/#aCevMm86QZqd [Accessed January 14, 2016].

  • Watson, L. et al., 2015. Ensuring safe communication in health care: a response to Johnston et al on their paper “Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams.” American Journal of Surgery, 211(1), pp.302–303.

  • Wilson, T.D., 2005. The nonsense of knowledge management. In E. Maceviciute & T. D. Wilson, eds. Introducing information management. London, UK: Facet Publishing, pp. 151–164.

  • Winkler, R., 2013. WhatsApp hits 400 million users, wants to stay independent. Available at: Wall Street Journal--Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/12/ 19/whatsapp-hits-400-million-users-wants-to-stay-independent [Accessed January 4, 2016].

  • Yang, L.-R., Chen, J.-H. & Wang, H.-W., 2012. Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice. Automation in Construction, 22, pp.182–191.

  • Yin, R.K., 2009. Case study research: Design and methods 4th ed., London, United Kingdom.: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Ziek, P. & Anderson, J.D., 2009. Communication, dialogue and project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(4), pp.788–803.


Abstract Views: 230

PDF Views: 103




  • The Use of ICT Platforms to Promote Knowledge Exchange in Project-Based Organisations

Abstract Views: 230  |  PDF Views: 103

Authors

Anjar Priyono
Magister Management Program, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the use of information and communication technology (ICT) to support knowledge exchange in project-based organisations. The primary ICT tool investigated in this research is WhatsApp, a messaging application that has been widely used since its introduction. An ethnographic case study method was utilised to analyse qualitative data collected from interviews and focus group discussions. Three projects in an Indonesian university with a duration ranging from 8 months to 2 years were examined as object of investigations. Broadly, the findings show that ICT tools are generally useful in supporting knowledge exchange, which ultimately positively affects project performance. The project teams relied on WhatsApp for the success of the projects. Although face-to-face meetings were rare, team communication was highly intensive, supported by WhatsApp. In addition, managers are encouraged to promote knowledge exchange between team members. Through knowledge exchange, there will be knowledge development, which facilitates the invention of new techniques and methods for promoting project success. The most prominent findings are presented using direct quotations to provide first hand insight from the field. At the end of the paper, recommendations regarding what project managers should do during and after the project has been completed are presented. The recommendations are classified based on the knowledge management life cycle, representing a structured method to manage knowledge in project-based organisations.

Keywords


Knowledge Exchange, Project Management, Knowledge Management, Information Technology, Project-Based Organisation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15759/ijek%2F2016%2Fv4i2%2F190270