Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Impact of Knowledge Capture and Knowledge Sharing on Learning, Adaptability, Job Satisfaction and Staying Intention:A Study of the Banking Industry in Bangladesh


Affiliations
1 Delaware State University, Dover-19901, DE, United States
 

The Knowledge Management (KM) has been defined as performing activites in discovering, capturing, sharing and applying knowledge in a more effective and effieicnt way. This study looks at only two such processes namely: capruring and sharing knowledge and their sub-processes. The purpose of this study is to conduct exploratory research to investigate the extent to which the sub-processes of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing of knowledge management impact the employee learning, adaptability, Job satisfaction and intention to stay on the job. This research was conducted using a purposive sample from financial services firms in Bangladesh. The sample consisted of 254 respondents from 23 different branches of eight commercial banks drawing from all levels of employees in the organizational hierarchy. The partial least squares (PLS) approach using Smart PLS has been used to test both the measurement and structural models. The findings of this study confirm that it is not the KM processes rather the sub-processes of KM process that can positively impact on employees' outcomes. This study involved self-administrated questionnaires and was open to all levels of staff and measured perceptions of the employees as opposed to actual behavior. This study suggests that employees' learning and adaptability depend on the usability and comfortability of the knowledge management initiatives undertaken by the management. Practitioners may employ the same experimental method using the instruments developed for this study to analyze the impact of the sub-processes of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing on employee outcomes. This study contributes to the existing literature of knowledge management that how the sub-processes of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing motivate employees to learn and adapt and how learning and adaptability contribute to job satisfaction and staying intention.

Keywords

Knowledge Capture, Knowledge Sharing, Employee Learning, Employee Adaptability, Job Satisfaction, Intention to Stay.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abelson, M., & Baysinger, B. (1984). Optimal and Dysfunctional Turnover: Toward an organizational level model. Academy of Management Review, 9, 331-341.
  • Bang, H. (2015). Volunteer age, job satisfaction, and intention to stay. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 36(2), 162-176.
  • Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., & Butler, B. S. (2011, December). The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 841-854.
  • Becerra-Fernandez, I., Gonzalez, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2004). Knowledge Management and KM Software Package. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
  • Benton, B. (2014, September 3). Importance of Employee Training. Retrieved from http://lineshapespace.com/importance-of-employee-training
  • Bornemann, M., & Sammer, M. (2003). Assessment methodology to prioritize knowledge management related activities to support organizational excellence. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(2), 21-28.
  • Boumarafi, B., & Jabnoun, N. (2008). Knowledge management and performance in UAE business organziations. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 6, 233-238.
  • Boundless. Defining Job Satisfaction. (2015, July 21). Retrieved April 3, 2016, from https://www.boundless.com/management/textbooks/boundless-management-textbook/organizational-behavior-5/drivers-of-behavior-44/defining-job-satisfaction-231-7247/
  • Cheung, S. Y. (2011). Refinement or breakthrough? The link between goal orientation , employee learning , creativity and job performance. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Chin, W. (1998). The Partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. Marcoulides, Modern Methods for Business Research. (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees' Adaptability and Perceptions of Change-Related Uncertainty: Implications for Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction, and Performance. Journal of Business Psychology, 269-280. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y
  • Dalton, D., Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. (1981). Functional turnover: An emperical assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 716-721.
  • Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Dibella, A., & Nevis, E. (1998). How Organization Learn: An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capacity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Droege, S. B., & Hoobler, J. M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knolwedge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 50-65.
  • Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A Practicle Guide to Factorial Validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91-109.
  • Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Ho, L.-A. (2008). What affects Organizational Performance? Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108(9), 1234-1254.
  • Hung, Y., Huang, S., Lin, Q., & Tsai, M. (2005). Critical factors in adapting a knowledge management system for the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Management and Data, 105(2), 164-183.
  • Jones, N., Herschel, R. T., & Moesel, D. D. (2003). Using 'knowledge champions' to facilitate knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 49-63.
  • Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Heilmannn, P. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 621-636.
  • King, W., Marks, P., & McCoy, S. (2002). The most important issues in knowledge management: What can knowledge management do for corporate memory, management thinking and IS responsibilityas well as for overall business performance. Communication of the ACM, 45(9), 93-97.
  • Koh, S., Gunasekaran, A., Thomas, A., & Arunachalam, S. (2005). The application of knowledge management in call centers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 56-69.
  • Kulkarni, U. R., Ravindran, S., & Freeze, R. (2006-7). A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoritical Development and Emperical Validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 309-347.
  • Lee-Kelley, L., Blackman, D. A., & Hurst, J. P. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learning organisations and the retention of knowledge workers. The Learning Organization, 14(3), 204-221.
  • Lundvall, B., & Nielson, P. (2007). Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 207-223.
  • Mahnke, V., Pedersen, T., & Venzin, M. (2005). The impact of knowledge management on MNC subsidiary performance: The role of absorptive capacity. Management International Review, 45(special issue), 101-119.
  • Marques, D. P., & Simon, F. J. (2006). The Effect of Knowledge Management Practices on Firm Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 143-156.
  • Misuraca, P. M. (2013, March). An examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and tacit knowledge sharing among knowledge workers: A quantitative study . Dissertation. UMI Dissertation Publishing.
  • Murray, R. (1999). Job satisfaction of professional and paraprofessional library staff at the University of North Carolina at Chapel hill. Dissertation .
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosiere, P. (2001). A Theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Antal-Berthoin, J. Child, & I. Nonaka, Handbook of Organizational and learning Knowledge Creation (pp. 491-517). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ployhart, R., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual ADAPTability (IADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences,and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In S. Burke, L. Pierce, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performancewithin complex environments (pp. 3-39). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Science.
  • Preez, R. D., & Bendixen, M. T. (2015). The impact of internal brand management on employee job satisfaction, brand commitment and intention to stay. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(1), 78-91.
  • Sabherwal, R., & Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2003). An Emperical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 225-260.
  • Salazar, A., Hackney, R., & Howells, J. (2003). The Strategic Impact of Internet Technology in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Firms: Insights from a Knowledge Management Perspective. Information Technology and Management, 4(2/3), 289-301.
  • Skyrme, D., & Amidon, D. (1997). Creating the Knowledge-Based Business. London: Business Intelligence.
  • Singh, M., Shankar, R., & Adish, K. (2006). Survey of Knowledge Management Practices in Indian Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(6), 110-128.
  • Suliman, A., & Al-Hosani, A. A. (2014, February). Job satisfaction and knowlege sharing: The case of the UAE. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 2(2), 24-33.
  • Teh, P.-L., & Sun, H. (2012). Knowledge sharing, job attitudes and organisational citizenship behaviour. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112(1), 64-82.
  • Trivellas, P., Akrivouli, Z., Tsifora, E., & Tsoutsa, P. (2015). The impact of knowledge sharing culture on job satisfaction in accounting firms. The mediating effect of general competencies. Procedia Economics and Finance, (pp. 238-247).
  • Tsai, M.-T., & Lee, K.-W. (2006). A study of knowledge internalization: from the perspective of learning cycle theory. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 57-71.
  • Yang, J.-t. (2007). The impact of knowlegde sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 83-90.
  • Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
  • Zack, M., Mckeen, J., & Singh, S. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational performance:an exploratory analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 392-409.

Abstract Views: 161

PDF Views: 58




  • The Impact of Knowledge Capture and Knowledge Sharing on Learning, Adaptability, Job Satisfaction and Staying Intention:A Study of the Banking Industry in Bangladesh

Abstract Views: 161  |  PDF Views: 58

Authors

Zahid Zamir
Delaware State University, Dover-19901, DE, United States

Abstract


The Knowledge Management (KM) has been defined as performing activites in discovering, capturing, sharing and applying knowledge in a more effective and effieicnt way. This study looks at only two such processes namely: capruring and sharing knowledge and their sub-processes. The purpose of this study is to conduct exploratory research to investigate the extent to which the sub-processes of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing of knowledge management impact the employee learning, adaptability, Job satisfaction and intention to stay on the job. This research was conducted using a purposive sample from financial services firms in Bangladesh. The sample consisted of 254 respondents from 23 different branches of eight commercial banks drawing from all levels of employees in the organizational hierarchy. The partial least squares (PLS) approach using Smart PLS has been used to test both the measurement and structural models. The findings of this study confirm that it is not the KM processes rather the sub-processes of KM process that can positively impact on employees' outcomes. This study involved self-administrated questionnaires and was open to all levels of staff and measured perceptions of the employees as opposed to actual behavior. This study suggests that employees' learning and adaptability depend on the usability and comfortability of the knowledge management initiatives undertaken by the management. Practitioners may employ the same experimental method using the instruments developed for this study to analyze the impact of the sub-processes of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing on employee outcomes. This study contributes to the existing literature of knowledge management that how the sub-processes of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing motivate employees to learn and adapt and how learning and adaptability contribute to job satisfaction and staying intention.

Keywords


Knowledge Capture, Knowledge Sharing, Employee Learning, Employee Adaptability, Job Satisfaction, Intention to Stay.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15759/ijek%2F2019%2Fv7i1%2F183967