Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Paradox of Child Labor and Sociology: Issues and Perspectives


Affiliations
1 UGC-CSSEIP Research Centre, University of Mysore, Mysore - 06, India
 

As society was constituted by unequals the possessed and dispossessed, the child who had to work to supplement or survive belonged to the dispossessed. The dispossessed economically depended on the owner of means of production lived always in want and deprivation. Such situation had existed in the past, perhaps in a most ruthless manner, and the conditionality of the existence and continuation was socio-politically sanctioned by that time. In-depth Anthropological study has acquired a great relevance to the present day problem emphasizing on, how community evaluates the risks associated with child labour. It is also most important to know the extent to which people are responsive to the various policies and programmes [27] of both Government and NGOs. The differences in the mental attitudes and outlooks regarding the causes for the existence of child labour in traditional societies and the modern societies are so important for the sociologists. Also the study demands a deep analysis of the broader framework of community norms regarding childhood as a life phase, the rights of children and the age and gender appropriateness for different types of work. This paper sheds light on how various social and cultural factors are embedded in the existence of child labour.

Keywords

Child Labor, Kinship, Practical Anthropology.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Gill, Violence against children: physical abuse in USA, Howard University Press: USA, pp. 45-47, 1980.
  • Fyfe, "Child labour and tradition in third world", Asian Journal of Anthropology., vol. 34(5), pp. 23-45, 1999.
  • Shah, Child and labour: some issues, H J Publication: UP, 1992. pp. 45-49.
  • Malinowski B., Argonauts of the Western Pacific: an account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea, Routledge and Kegan: London, 1992, pp. 34-48.
  • Radcliffe-Brown., "The comparative method in social anthropology", Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 81(2), pp. 22-24, 1951.
  • Firth R. "Social Organization and Social Change", Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 84(4), pp. 1-20, 1954.
  • Naidu., Child labor among tribals, Venkates Prakashana: New Delhi, 2003, pp. 12-29.
  • Foster., "The dyadic contract: a model for social structure of a Mexican peasant village", American Anthropology., vol. 63(3), pp. 1173-1192, 1961.
  • Nieuwenhuys., "The paradox of child labor and anthropology", Annu Rev Anthropol., vol. 12(34), pp. 34-41, 1996.
  • Weiner., "Socialization of childhood and work", Critiq Anthropol., vol. 23(4), pp. 45-48, 1999.
  • Kristoffeland., "Economic importance of child labor in traditional society", Irish Review of Anthropology., vol. 31(21), pp. 1232-1245, 1997.
  • Mead M., Culture and commitment, The Natural History Press: USA, 1970, pp. 45-49.
  • Bissell., Susan manufacturing childhood: the lives and livelihood of children in slums, University of Melbourne: Australia, 2000. pp. 34-36.
  • Geetha., Subrahmanian., Getting children back to school: case studies in primary education, Ramachandran V., Ed., Gender and Equity in Primary Education, Sage Publication, 2003. pp. 176-215.
  • Lieten, "Child and work: number from the general to the specific", Indian J Lab Econ., vol. 48(1), pp. 23-28, 2005.
  • Marx K., A contribution to the critique of political economy in the collected works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, New York: International Publishers, vol. 29, 1987, pp. 257-417.
  • Burra., Born to work: child labor in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 35-39.
  • Mendelievich E., Children at work in USA, USA: St. Martinis Press, 1980, pp. 34-36.
  • Mishra, "Supply of child labor: an investigation", Journal of Labor and Development., vol. 1(1), pp. 89-91, 2001.
  • Blechred., Child in cultural anthropology, The Anthropologist., vol. 4, pp. 34-38, 1993.
  • Bhargava G., Child labor, New Delhi: Kalpaz Publication, pp. 2003, 123-139.
  • Rosen C., "Child labor and society", J Gend Stud., vol. 23(10), 2001, pp. 123-23.
  • Olivier C., Sociological prospective of child labor in India, Wind Publication: USA, 2001, pp.67-69.
  • Mamtha R., Child labor: the Indian prospective, Kilaso Publication, New Delhi, 2003, pp. 56-59.
  • Nayer U., "Labor of the Indian girl child: multi curse, multi abuse and multi neglect", Indian J Soc Work., vol. 3(1), pp. 37-47, 1991.
  • Nanjunda., Anthropology and child labor, New Delhi: Mittal Publications, 2010, pp. 23-59.
  • Nanjunda D.C., "The plight of child laborers in Bangalore City, India: a micro level study", Rajagiri Journal of Social Development., vol. 6(1), 2009.

Abstract Views: 555

PDF Views: 560




  • The Paradox of Child Labor and Sociology: Issues and Perspectives

Abstract Views: 555  |  PDF Views: 560

Authors

D. C. Nanjunda
UGC-CSSEIP Research Centre, University of Mysore, Mysore - 06, India

Abstract


As society was constituted by unequals the possessed and dispossessed, the child who had to work to supplement or survive belonged to the dispossessed. The dispossessed economically depended on the owner of means of production lived always in want and deprivation. Such situation had existed in the past, perhaps in a most ruthless manner, and the conditionality of the existence and continuation was socio-politically sanctioned by that time. In-depth Anthropological study has acquired a great relevance to the present day problem emphasizing on, how community evaluates the risks associated with child labour. It is also most important to know the extent to which people are responsive to the various policies and programmes [27] of both Government and NGOs. The differences in the mental attitudes and outlooks regarding the causes for the existence of child labour in traditional societies and the modern societies are so important for the sociologists. Also the study demands a deep analysis of the broader framework of community norms regarding childhood as a life phase, the rights of children and the age and gender appropriateness for different types of work. This paper sheds light on how various social and cultural factors are embedded in the existence of child labour.

Keywords


Child Labor, Kinship, Practical Anthropology.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15613/hijrh%2F2014%2Fv1i2%2F61723