Dnyanamay

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Attitudes Towards Disabled Children:A Qualitative Study in Rural Region of Maharashtra


Affiliations
1 PES, Modern College of Physiotherapy, Shivajinagar, Pune, India
2 Dept of PSM, Rural Medical College, PIMS(DU), India
 

Purpose: The majority of children and young people with disabilities live in developing countries where they face inequalities in education and other opportunities. Negative attitudes constitute one of the major barriers to the development of their potential. The study aimed to describe the attitudes of students without disability towards their peers with disability, and to assess the role that gender and interpersonal contact play in shaping these attitudes.

Method: A cross-sectional study involving 107 students was carried out in secondary school located in rural area of Maharashtra. Participants were recruited from a group of 118 students in the three junior classes and senior class one. A semi-structured questionnaire containing items on the "Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes Towards Children with Handicaps (CATCH) scale", which elicits responses on a Likert scale numbered 0 to 4 (0-strongly disagree, 4-strongly agree), was administered. Data analysis was done using Stata version 12. Descriptive analysis was carried out and association between variables was determined using independent two-tailed t-tests.

Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.83. The attitudes of the students in the school was generally positive (M=22.55, SD = 3.79). Female students had higher total scores (M = 24.76, SD = 2.78) than their male contemporaries (M = 19.84, SD = 3.05), t (103) = 8.55, p = 0.000. Having a friend/relative with a disability was associated with more positive attitudes among female students.

Conclusion: In this rural setting, the attitudes of students towards their peers with disability were generally positive. Since interpersonal contact was associated with positive attitudes towards students with disabilities, interventions should be directed towards promoting interpersonal relationships in order to build an integrated society.


Keywords

Attitudes Towards Peers with Disability, School, Rural Area Maharashtra.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • • Ajuwon PA (2008). Inclusive education for students with disabilities in Nigeria: Benefits, challenges and policy implications. International Journal of Special Education; 23(3): 1-16.

  • •Allport G (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge(MA): Addison-Wesley.

  • • Beck AR, Fritz H, Keller A, Dennis M ( 2000). Attitudes of school-aged children towardstheir peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication; 16: 13-26.

  • • Christensen C (1996). Disabled, handicapped or disordered: `What’sin a name?’. In: F. R. C Christensen, ed. Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice. Buckingham: Open University Press; 63-77.

  • • Eagly A, Chaiken S (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth ( TX): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • • Feldman R (1993). Understanding psychology. 3rd ed. New York: McGrawHill.

  • • Gaad E (2004). Cross-cultural perspectives on the effect of cultural attitudes towards inclusion for children with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education; 8(3): 311-328.

  • • Garuba A (2003). Inclusive education in the 21st century: challenges and opportunities for Nigeria.Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal; 14(2): 191-200.

  • • Godeau E, Vignes C, Sentenac M, Ehlinger V, Navarro F, Grandjean H, Arnaud C (2010). Improving attitudes towards children with disabilities in a school context: a cluster randomised intervention study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology; October, 52(10): e236-242.

  • • Krajewski JJ, Hyde M, O’Keefe M (2002). Teen attitudes toward individuals with mental retardation from 1987 to 1998: Impact of respondent gender and school variables. Education & Training in Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities; 37: 27–39.

  • • Krajewski J J, Hyde S H (2000). Comparison of teen attitudes toward individuals with mental retardation between 1987 and 1998: Has inclusion made a difference?. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities; September, 35(3): 284–293.

  • • Lupua E, Cernatb C, Petrec C (2011). Identifying the attitude of healthy individuals towards disabled children – A chance to be educated for all. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences; 29: 266–271.

  • • ManettiM,SchneiderBH,SipersteinG(2001). Social acceptance of children with mental retardation: Testing the contact hypothesis with an Italian sample. International Journal of Behavioural Development; 25: 279–286.

  • • McConkey R, McCormack B, Naughton M (1983). A national survey of young people’s perceptions of mental handicap. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research; 27(Pt 3): 171– 83.

  • • Okunrotifa E (1988). Handicapped students and educational services: Students’ attitudes and awareness. Nigerian Journal of Counselling and Development; 2: 34-39.

  • • Olofintoye T T (2010). Towards inclusion: the trends of psycho-social adjustment of students in Nigerian integrated junior secondary schools. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences; 5: 1146–1150.

  • • Pettigrew T, Tropp L (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 90: 751– 783.

  • • RimmermanA,HozmiB,DuvdevanyI(2000). Contact and attitudes toward individuals with disabilities among students tutoring children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability; 25(1): 13–18.

  • • RosenbergM(1960).Cognitivereorganisation in response to hypnotic reversal of attitudinal affect. Journal of Personality; 28: 39-63.

  • • Rosenbaum PL, Armstrong RW, King SM (1986). Children’s attitudes toward disabled peers: A self-report measure. Journal of Paediatric Psychology; 11(4): 517–530.

  • • Rosenbaum PL, Armstrong RW, King SM (1988). Determinants of children’s attitudes towards disability: A review of evidence. Care of Children’s Health; 17: 32-39.

  • • Rousso H (2003). Education for All: A gender and disability, New York: UNESCO.

  • • Tirosh E, Schanin M, Reiter S (1997). Children’s attitudes towards peers with disabilities: the Israeli perspective. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology; 39(12): 811-814.

  • • United Nations Children’s Fund (2005). The state of world’s children 2006: Excluded and invisible, New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.

  • • Vignes C, Coley N, Grandiean H, Godeau E, Arnaud C (2008). Measuring children’s attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of instruments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology; 50: 182–189.

  • • Wong DKP (2008). Do contacts make a difference? The effects of mainstreaming on student attitudes towards people with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities; 29: 70–82.

  • • World Health Organisation (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, World Health Organisation.

  • • World Health Organisation (2010). Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines, Geneva: World Health Organisation.

  • • World Health Organisation, 2011. World report on disability, Geneva: World Health Organisation.


Abstract Views: 312

PDF Views: 109




  • Attitudes Towards Disabled Children:A Qualitative Study in Rural Region of Maharashtra

Abstract Views: 312  |  PDF Views: 109

Authors

Shende Mahendra
PES, Modern College of Physiotherapy, Shivajinagar, Pune, India
Phalke Vaishali
Dept of PSM, Rural Medical College, PIMS(DU), India

Abstract


Purpose: The majority of children and young people with disabilities live in developing countries where they face inequalities in education and other opportunities. Negative attitudes constitute one of the major barriers to the development of their potential. The study aimed to describe the attitudes of students without disability towards their peers with disability, and to assess the role that gender and interpersonal contact play in shaping these attitudes.

Method: A cross-sectional study involving 107 students was carried out in secondary school located in rural area of Maharashtra. Participants were recruited from a group of 118 students in the three junior classes and senior class one. A semi-structured questionnaire containing items on the "Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes Towards Children with Handicaps (CATCH) scale", which elicits responses on a Likert scale numbered 0 to 4 (0-strongly disagree, 4-strongly agree), was administered. Data analysis was done using Stata version 12. Descriptive analysis was carried out and association between variables was determined using independent two-tailed t-tests.

Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.83. The attitudes of the students in the school was generally positive (M=22.55, SD = 3.79). Female students had higher total scores (M = 24.76, SD = 2.78) than their male contemporaries (M = 19.84, SD = 3.05), t (103) = 8.55, p = 0.000. Having a friend/relative with a disability was associated with more positive attitudes among female students.

Conclusion: In this rural setting, the attitudes of students towards their peers with disability were generally positive. Since interpersonal contact was associated with positive attitudes towards students with disabilities, interventions should be directed towards promoting interpersonal relationships in order to build an integrated society.


Keywords


Attitudes Towards Peers with Disability, School, Rural Area Maharashtra.

References