Drishtikon: A Management Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Empirical Analysis of Growth and Distribution of Microfinance in India using Panel-Corrected Standard Error Fixed Effect Method


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
2 Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


An attempt was made to analyze the Growth and Distribution of Microfinance in India towards SHG-BLP programme during the period 2008-09 to 2019-20. Study was intended to assess the sustainability of microfinance program in India through its financial lending towards SHG-BLP. Endogeneity model of financial lending towards microfinance was chosen for the study under which bank-loans were taken as dependent variable affected by Independent variables i.e. savings, number of SHGs, loan outstanding and lagged or endogenous variable of bank loans. State-specific effects were measured for the analysis of Growth and distribution of microfinance in India. Model used the PCSE fixed effect methods to highlight the State-specific growth potential of microfinance in India. Study also used post-hoc analysis to assess the performance of commercial, cooperative and regional rural banks in bank linkage program through SHGs and concluded that commercial banks were found highest contributing in SHG-BLP however the growth trends supports the easy accessibility and availability of RRBs in terms of savings, loan disbursement and even in loan outstanding. Period for this assessment was taken from 2009-10 to 2018-19. Empirical finding raised a serious concern about the growth and distribution of Microfinance in India by highlighting the rising trend of loan outstanding in the financial lending towards SHG-BLP. It was found that the financial lending in India towards microfinance is majorly driven by number of SHGs, loan outstanding followed by savings. This also was observed that endogenous factor past period of loans also affected the bank-loans towards SHG-BLP in India. The selected states and agencies performing towards microfinance were contributing greater in loan outstanding than loan disbursed towards the program raised the need for sustainable policy implications for the microfinance program in India.

Keywords

SHGs, Microfinance, Panel Data, PCSE, Post-Hoc, Commercial Banks, RRBs, Cooperative Banks, Endogenous
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Laha, A., & Kuri, P. K. (2014). Measuring the impact of microfinance on women empowerment: A cross country analysis with special reference to India. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(7).

  • Jayadev, M., & Sunder, D. K. (2016). Changing contours of microfinance in India. New Delhi, India: Routledge India.

  • Hatia, A., Sivakumar, S. N. V., & Agarwal, A. (2016). A contemporary study of microfinnce: A study for India’s underprivileged. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 23-31.

  • Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.

  • Chandran, K. P., & Sandhya, P. (2012). Progress of SHGs-bank linkages in India: An assessment of key issues. Economic Affairs, 57(8), 307-314.

  • Louis, M. (2015). Growth of SHG-bank linkage programme - A comparative study of six regions in India. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 2(8), 28-37.

  • Mahanta, P., Panda, G., & Sreekumar. (2012). Status of microfinance in India - A review. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research, 1(11), 142-155.

  • Mohd, S. (2018). A study on the performance of microfinance institutions in India. International Academic Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 5(4), 116-128.

  • NABARD. (2008). Status of Microfinance 2007-08. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2009). Status of Microfinance 2008-09. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2010). Status of Microfinance 2009-10. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2011). Status of Microfinance 2010-11. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2012). Status of Microfinance 2011-12. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2013). Status of Microfinance 2012-13. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2014). Status of Microfinance 2013-14. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2015). Status of Microfinance 2014-15. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2016). Status of Microfinance 2015-16. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2017). Status of Microfinance 2016-17. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2018). Status of Microfinance 2017-18. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • NABARD. (2019). Status of Microfinance 2018-19. Mumbai: NABARD.

  • PMJDY. (2018). Pradhanmantri Jan Dhan Yojana. Retrieved 2021, from www.pmjdy.gov.in; https://pmjdy.gov.in/BankwiseLatest

  • Robinson, M. S. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • SIDBI. (2019). Microfinance pulse report. SIDBI.

  • Saravanan, S., & Dash, D. P. (2017). Growth and distribution of microfinance in India: A panel data analysis. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 24(1(610)), 127-146.

  • Srinivasan, N. (2008). Microfinance India: State of the sector report 2009. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.

  • Sukanya, N. (2017). The SHG-bank linkage programme and financial inclusion in India: A review of the recent trends. GITAM Journal of Management, 15(2), 33-42.

  • Thorat, U. (2006, February). Financial inclusion and millenium goals. Reserve Bank of India Bulletin.


Abstract Views: 211

PDF Views: 0




  • Empirical Analysis of Growth and Distribution of Microfinance in India using Panel-Corrected Standard Error Fixed Effect Method

Abstract Views: 211  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Hemlata Manglani
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
Lalita Kumari
Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


An attempt was made to analyze the Growth and Distribution of Microfinance in India towards SHG-BLP programme during the period 2008-09 to 2019-20. Study was intended to assess the sustainability of microfinance program in India through its financial lending towards SHG-BLP. Endogeneity model of financial lending towards microfinance was chosen for the study under which bank-loans were taken as dependent variable affected by Independent variables i.e. savings, number of SHGs, loan outstanding and lagged or endogenous variable of bank loans. State-specific effects were measured for the analysis of Growth and distribution of microfinance in India. Model used the PCSE fixed effect methods to highlight the State-specific growth potential of microfinance in India. Study also used post-hoc analysis to assess the performance of commercial, cooperative and regional rural banks in bank linkage program through SHGs and concluded that commercial banks were found highest contributing in SHG-BLP however the growth trends supports the easy accessibility and availability of RRBs in terms of savings, loan disbursement and even in loan outstanding. Period for this assessment was taken from 2009-10 to 2018-19. Empirical finding raised a serious concern about the growth and distribution of Microfinance in India by highlighting the rising trend of loan outstanding in the financial lending towards SHG-BLP. It was found that the financial lending in India towards microfinance is majorly driven by number of SHGs, loan outstanding followed by savings. This also was observed that endogenous factor past period of loans also affected the bank-loans towards SHG-BLP in India. The selected states and agencies performing towards microfinance were contributing greater in loan outstanding than loan disbursed towards the program raised the need for sustainable policy implications for the microfinance program in India.

Keywords


SHGs, Microfinance, Panel Data, PCSE, Post-Hoc, Commercial Banks, RRBs, Cooperative Banks, Endogenous

References