Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Nanotechnology in Crop Protection: A Review


Affiliations
1 Department of Pharmacognosy, Matoshri Institute of Pharmacy, Dhanore, Yeola, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The establishment and development of new pathogenic races is a constant problem, because chemical pest control is both expensive and ineffectual. Nanomaterials have lately been proposed as a potential alternative for reducing plant diseases and crop protection. Agricultural methods usually include the systematic administration of a variety of active chemicals at varied dosages and frequency, resulting in a variety of selective regimes. Crop protection is critical in the production of food all over the world. Nanotechnologies are being employed more and more to maintain traditional crops and to develop novel crops with superior qualities. Pollen magnetofection and gene nanocarriers are two nanobiotechnologies that are now being used to improve pest, weed, and disease management, as well as agricultural genetic modification. Traditional crop pest, weed, and disease management has been greatly enhanced thanks to a better understanding of the synthesis of nanomaterials with extraordinary capabilities. Plant germination, growth, and crop protection have all been proved to benefit from nanoparticles in agriculture. The enhanced specific surface area of nanomaterials benefits fertilisers and insecticides. Nanomaterials have also been developed for a variety of applications such as medical, medication delivery, electronics, fuel cells, solar cells, food, space, and so on. This chapter outlines recent attempts the use of nanotechnologies in agriculture in novel ways that could assist meet rising food demand while also ensuring environmental sustainability.

Keywords

Nanotechnology, crop protection, crop production, nanomaterial’s, pesticide, Nano fertilizers, nanoagrochemical, plant disease management, application.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ghidan AY, Al-Antary TM, Salem NM, Awwad AM. Facile green synthetic route to the zinc oxide (ZnONPs) nanoparticles: Effect on green peach aphid and antibacterial activity. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017a; 9(2):131-138
  • Pilarska A, Wysokowski M, Markiewicz E, Jesionowski T. Synthesis of magnesium hydroxide and its calcinates by a precipitation method with the use of magnesium sulfate and poly (ethylene glycols). Powder Technology. 2013; 235:148-157
  • Ghidan AY, Al Antary TM, Awwad AM. Aphidicidal potential of green synthesized magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles using Olea europaea leaves extract. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 2017b; 12(10):293-301
  • Huang S, Wang L, Liu L, Hou Y, Li L. Nanotechnology in agriculture, livestock, and aquaculture in China. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015; 35:369-400
  • US Environmental Protection Agency. Nanotechnology White Paper. Report EPA 100/B-07/001, Washington, DC, USA; 2007. Availablefrom: http://www.epa.gov/osainter/pdfs/nanotech/epananotechnologywhitepaper-0207.pdf. Accessed June 9, 2014
  • United States Department of Agriculture. Nanoscale science and engineering for agriculture and food systems. Report submitted to Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, United States Department of Agriculture, National Planning Workshop; 18-19 November 2002; Washington, DC, USA. 2002
  • Nakache E, Poulain N, Candau F, Orecchioni AM, Irache JM. Biopolymer and polymer nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. In: Nalwa HS, editor. Handbook of Nanostructured Materials and Nanotechnology. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA. 1999
  • Dwivedi S., Saquib Q., Al-Khedhairy A.A., Musarrat J. Understanding the role of nanomaterials in agriculture. In: Singh D.P., Singh H.B., Prabha R., editors. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. Springer; New Delhi, India: 2016. pp. 271–288.
  • Review Current and future editing reagent delivery systems for plant genome editing. Ran Y, Liang Z, Gao CSci China Life Sci. 2017 May; 60(5):490-505
  • Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing In Vitro and In Vivo Enabled by Synthetic Nanoparticle Co-Delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA.Miller JB, Zhang S, Kos P, Xiong H, Zhou K, Perelman SS, Zhu H, Siegwart DJ Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jan 19; 56(4):1059-1063.
  • Afsharinejad A., Davy A., Jennings B., Brennan C. Performance analysis of plant monitoring nanosensor networks at THz frequencies. IEEE Internet Things J. 2016; 3:59–69. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2015.2463685.
  • Review Nanosensor Technology Applied to Living Plant Systems. Kwak SY, Wong MH, Lew TTS, Bisker G, Lee MA, Kaplan A, Dong J, Liu AT, Koman VB, Sinclair R, Hamann C, Strano MS Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2017 Jun 12; 10(1):113-140.
  • Lahiani MH, Dervishi E, Chen J, Nima Z, Gaume A, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV Impact of carbon nanotube exposure to seeds of valuable crops. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013 Aug 28; 5(16):7965-73
  • Srivastava A., Rao D. Enhancement of seed germination and plant growth of wheat, maize, peanut and garlic using multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2014; 3:502–504.
  • Joshi A, Kaur S, Dharamvir K, Nayyar H, Verma G Multi-walled carbon nanotubes applied through seed-priming influence early germination, root hair, growth and yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jun; 98(8):3148-316.
  • Lu C., Zhang C., Wen J., Wu G., Tao M.X. Research of the effect of nanometer materials on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soybean Sci. 2002; 21:168–171
  • Disfani M.N., Mikhak A., Kassaee M.Z., Maghari A. Effects of nano Fe/SiO2 fertilizers on germination and growth of barley and maize. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017; 63:817–826. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2016.1239016.
  • Shankramma K, Yallappa S, Shivanna MB, Manjanna J. Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles to enhance S. lycopersicum (tomato) plant growth and their biomineralization. Applied Nanoscience. 2016; 6:983-990.
  • Salem NM, Albanna LS, Abdeen A, Ibrahim OQ, Awwad AI. Sulfur nanoparticles improves root and shoot growth of tomato. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016; 8(4):179-185.
  • Ghidan AY, Al-Antary TM, Awwad AM, Ghidan OY, Al Araj SE, Ateyyat MA. Comparison of different green synthesized nanomaterials on green peach aphid as aphicidal potential. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2018a, 2018a; 27(10):7009-7016.
  • Ghidan AY, Al-Antary TM, Awwad AM, Ayad JY. Physiological effect of some nanomaterials on pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2018b; 27(11):7872-7878.
  • Dubey M, Bhadauria S, Kushwah BS. Green synthesis of nanosilver particles from extract of Eucalyptus hybrida (safeda) leaf. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures. 2009; 4:537-543
  • Sharon M, Choudhary AK, Kumar R. Nanotechnology in agricultural diseases and food safety. Journal of Phytopathology. 2010; 2:83-92 24. Clement JL, Jarrett PS. Antibacterial silver. Metal-Based Drugs. 1994; 1:467-482
  • Kim YH, Lee DK, Cha HG, Kim CW, Kang YC, Kang YS. Preparation and characterization of the antibacterial Cu nanoparticle formed on the surface of SiO2 nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2006; 110:24923-24928
  • Wei D, Sun W, Qian W, Ye Y, Ma X. The synthesis of chitosan-based silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Carbohydrate Research. 2009; 344:2375-2382
  • Esteban TL, MalpartidaF, Esteban CA, Pecharroman C, Moya JS. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of a soda-lime glass containing copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2009; 20:505701
  • Brunel F, El Gueddari NE, Moerschbacher B M. Complexation of copper (II) with chitosan nanogels: Toward control of microbial growth. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013; 92:1348-1356
  • Gogoi R, Dureja P, Singh PK. Nanoformulations – A safer and effective option for agrochemicals. Indian Farming. 2009; 59:7-12
  • Yata, V.K.; Tiwari, B.C.; Ahmad, I. Research Trends and Patents in Nano-food and Agriculture. In Nanoscience in Food and Agriculture 5; Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–20
  • Shang, Y.; Hasan, M.K.; Ahammed, G.J.; Li, M.; Yin, H.; Zhou, J. Applications of Nanotechnology in Plant Growth and Crop Protection: A Review. Molecules 2019, 24, 2558
  • Kwak, S.-Y.; Wong, M.H.; Lew, T.T.S.; Bisker, G.; Lee, M.A.; Kaplan, A.; Dong, J.; Liu, A.T.; Koman, V.B.; Sinclair, R.; et al. Na-nosensor Technology Applied to Living Plant Systems. Ann. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017, 10, 113–140
  • Zadran, S.; Standley, S.; Wong, K.; Otiniano, E.; Amighi, A.; Baudry, M. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensors: Visualizing cellular dynamics and bioenergetics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 895–902.
  • Stiles, P.L.; Dieringer, J.A.; Shah, N.C.; Duyne, R.P.V. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008, 1, 601–626.
  • Wujcik, E.K.; Wei, H.; Zhang, X.; Guo, J.; Yan, X.; Sutrave, N.; Wei, S.; Guo, Z. Antibody nanosensors: A detailed review. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 43725–43745
  • Zhang, J.; Landry, M.P.; Barone, P.W.; Kim, J.-H.; Lin, S.; Ulissi, Z.W.; Lin, D.; Mu, B.; Boghossian, A.A.; Hilmer, A.J.; et al. Molecular recognition using corona phase complexes made of synthetic polymers adsorbed on carbon nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 959–968
  • Bao Shan L, Chun Hui L, Li Jun F, Shu chun Q, Min Y (2004) Effect of TMS (nanostructured silicon dioxide) on growth of Changbai larch seedlings. Journal of Forestry research 15(2): 138-140.
  • Morla S, Rao CR, Chakrapani R (2011) Factors affecting seed germination and seedling growth of tomato plants cultured in vitro conditions. Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences (JCBPS) 1(2): 328-334.
  • Husen A, Siddiqi KS (2014) Carbon and fullerene nanomaterials in plant system. Journal of nanobiotechnology 12: 16.
  • Barrena R, Casals E, Colón J, Font X, Sánchez A, et al. (2009) Evaluation of the ecotoxicity of model nanoparticles. Chemosphere 75(7): 850-857.
  • Gopinath K, Gowri S, Karthika V, Arumugam A (2014) Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles from fruit extract of Terminalia arjuna, for the enhanced seed germination activity of Gloriosa superba. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry 4(3): 115.
  • Salama HMH (2012) Effects of silver nanoparticles in some crop plants, common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and corn (Zea mays L.). Int Res J Biotech 3(10): 190-197.
  • Sharma P, Bhatt D, Zaidi MG, Saradhi PP, Khanna PK, et al. (2012) Silver nanoparticlemediated enhancement in growth and antioxidant status of Brassica juncea. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167(8): 2225-2233.
  • Sharon M, Choudhary AK, Kumar R. Nanotechnology in agricultural diseases and food safety. Journal of Phytology. 2010; 2(4):83-92.
  • Rao KJ, Paria S. Use of sulfur nanoparticles as a green pesticide on Fusarium solani and Venturia inaequalis phytopathogens. RSC Advances. 2013; 3(26):10471-10478
  • Rouhani M, Mohammad AS, Kalantari S. Insecticidal effect of silver and zinc nanoparticles against Aphis nerii Boyer of fonscolombe (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2012; 72(4):590-594.
  • Rao KJ, Paria S. Use of sulfur nanoparticles as a green pesticide on Fusarium solani and Venturia inaequalis phytopathogens. RSC Advances. 2013; 3(26):10471-10478.
  • Moraru CI, Panchapakesan CPH, Takhistov Q, Liu PS, Kokini JL. Nanotechnology: a new frontier in food science. Food Technology. 2003; 57(12):24-29.
  • Allahvaisi S. Effects of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and polymers on stored pests for improving the industry of packaging foodstuffs. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2016; 4(4):633-640.

Abstract Views: 67

PDF Views: 0




  • Nanotechnology in Crop Protection: A Review

Abstract Views: 67  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. Shaikh Habeeba
Department of Pharmacognosy, Matoshri Institute of Pharmacy, Dhanore, Yeola, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


The establishment and development of new pathogenic races is a constant problem, because chemical pest control is both expensive and ineffectual. Nanomaterials have lately been proposed as a potential alternative for reducing plant diseases and crop protection. Agricultural methods usually include the systematic administration of a variety of active chemicals at varied dosages and frequency, resulting in a variety of selective regimes. Crop protection is critical in the production of food all over the world. Nanotechnologies are being employed more and more to maintain traditional crops and to develop novel crops with superior qualities. Pollen magnetofection and gene nanocarriers are two nanobiotechnologies that are now being used to improve pest, weed, and disease management, as well as agricultural genetic modification. Traditional crop pest, weed, and disease management has been greatly enhanced thanks to a better understanding of the synthesis of nanomaterials with extraordinary capabilities. Plant germination, growth, and crop protection have all been proved to benefit from nanoparticles in agriculture. The enhanced specific surface area of nanomaterials benefits fertilisers and insecticides. Nanomaterials have also been developed for a variety of applications such as medical, medication delivery, electronics, fuel cells, solar cells, food, space, and so on. This chapter outlines recent attempts the use of nanotechnologies in agriculture in novel ways that could assist meet rising food demand while also ensuring environmental sustainability.

Keywords


Nanotechnology, crop protection, crop production, nanomaterial’s, pesticide, Nano fertilizers, nanoagrochemical, plant disease management, application.

References