Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Work from Home on Workplace Romance: A Socio-Economic Perspective


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor in HR, United School of Business Management, Bhubaneswar, India
2 Assistant Professor in Economics, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India
 

There has been a lot of research work on Covid, but hardly any on impact of work from home (WfH) on workplace romance (WR). WR in organizations has been a controversial and debatable topic since early days. From the literature it was visible that researchers tried to analyze the impact of WR on organizational settings. In India the relationship is considered to be a forbidden taboo, especially in academic sector, where teachers are compared to the divine trinity – Brahma, Vishnu and Maheswar. But, with growing westernization and mushrooming of professional institutions with long working hours, the forbidden relationship was booming. Our study was carried out to examine the antecedents and consequences of workplace romance on various socio-economic variables, in Odisha before, during and post WfH scenario. A set of standard questionnaire on antecedents and consequences of WR was circulated. Data was collected from 230 samples consisting of 103 female and 127 male respondents from academic sector of Odisha. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of the data. The results of the study revealed that individuals got involved in workplace romance because of job insecurity (mostly in private institutes). Long working hour and outdoor activities promoted it. In the second phase that is during work from home same respondents were asked to predict whether work from home increases or decreases workplace romance. To which their reply was that it may reduce the workplace response. In the third and final phase i.e. post work from home the academicians (samples) were asked about the existing situation of Workplace romance. It was found out that employees continued to be engaged in workplace romance after work from home, as workplace romance was not only because of long working hours but also for their own life preferences. There was no positive relationship between workplace romance and efficiency/productivity, as many institutes were not able to capitalize on the relationship.

Keywords

Work from Home, Workplace Romance, Socioeconomic Variables.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alder, G. S., & Quist, D. M. (2014). Rethinking love at the office: Antecedents and consequences of coworker evaluations of workplace romances. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 329-351.

  • Anderson, C. I., & Hunsaker, P. L. (1985). Why theres romancing at the office and why its everybody’s problem. Personnel, 62(2), 57-63.

  • Anderson, C. J., & Fisher, C. (1991). Male-female relationships in the workplace: Perceived motivations in office romance. Sex Roles, 25(3-4), 163-180.

  • Barratt, C. L., & Nordstrom, C. R. (2011). Cupid’s cubicle: Co-workers’ reactions to workplace romance characteristics. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 9-23.

  • Barsade, S. G., & O’Neill, O. A. (2014). What’s love got to do with it? A longitudinal study of the culture of companionate love and employee and client outcomes in a long-term care setting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 551–598.

  • Bergart, A. M. (2004). Group work as an antidote to the isolation of bearing an invisible stigma. Social Work with Groups, 26(3), 33-43.

  • Bordwin, M. (1994). Are office romances OK?Training & Development,48, 38.

  • Bowes-Sperry, L. & Powell, G.N. (1999), Observers’ Reactions to Social– Sexual Behavior at Work: An Ethical Decision Making Perspective, Journal of Management, 25(6), 779-802

  • Boyd, C. (2010). The debate over the prohibition of romance in the workplace

  • Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 325-338.

  • Brown, T. J., & Allgeier, E. R. (1995). Managers’ perceptions of workplace romances: An interview study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(2), 169176.

  • Brown, T. J., & Allgeier, E. R. (1996). The Impact of Participant Characteristics, Perceived Motives, and Job Behaviors on Co‐Workers’ Evaluations of Workplace Romances 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(7), 577-595.

  • Byrne, D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

  • Byrne, D., & Neuman, J. H. (1992). The implications of attraction research for organizational issues. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 82, pp. 29-70). NorthHolland.

  • Byrne, D., Ervin, C. R., & Lamberth, J. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 16(1), 157.

  • Civil, J. (1998), Sexuality at Work, London: Batsford

  • Clarke, L. (2006). Sexual relationships and sexual conduct in the workplace. Legal Studies, 26(3), 347-368.

  • Clarke, L.(2006). Sexual Relationships and Sexual Conduct in the Workplace. Legal Studies, 26 (3): 347-368.

  • Cowan, R. L., & Horan, S. M. (2014). Why are you dating him? Contemporary motives for workplace romance. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 15(1), 9–16.

  • Deitch, E. A., Barsky, A., Butz, R. M., Chan, S., Brief, A. P., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). Subtle yet significant: The existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations, 56(11), 1299-1324.

  • Devine, I., & Markiewicz, D. (1990). Cross-sex relationships at work and the impact of gender stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4-5), 333-338.

  • Dillard, J. P. (1987). Close relationships at work: Perceptions of the motives and performance of relational participants. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(2), 179-193.

  • Dillard, J. P., & Broetzmann, S. M. (1989). Romantic relationships at work: Perceived changes in job-related behaviors as a function of participant’s motive, partner’s motive, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 93– 110.

  • Dillard, J. P., Hale, J. L., & Segrin, C. (1994). Close relationships in task environments: Perceptions of relational types, illicitness, and power. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 227–255.

  • Driscoll, J. B., & Bova, R. A. (1980). The sexual side of enterprise. Management Review, 69(7), 51-62.

  • Fagenson, E. A. (1993). Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Foley, S., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Not all is fair in love and work: Coworkers’ preferences for and responses to managerial interventions regarding workplace romances. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1043-1056.

  • Ford, R.C. and McLaughlin, F.S. (1987). Should Cupid come to the workplace? An ASPA survey. Personnel Administrator, October, 100–110.

  • Forster, J., Epstude, K., & Ozelsel, A. (2009). Why love has wings and sex has not: How reminders of love and sex influence creative and analytic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1479–1491.

  • Gomes, G. M., Owens, J. M., & Morgan, J. F. (2006). The paramour’s advantage: sexual favoritism and permissibly unfair discrimination. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(2), 73-88.

  • Greenberg, E. R. (1998). The libido and the workplace.Management Review,87,9 Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 63–76.

  • Hoffman, L., Clinebell, S., & Kilpatrick, J. (1997). Office romances: The new battleground over employees’ rights to privacy and the employers’ right to intervene. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10(4), 263-275.

  • Hogg, M. A., & Cooper, J. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of social psychology: Concise student edition. Sage.

  • Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2009). When work and love mix: Perceptions of peers in workplace romances. Western Journal of Communication, 73(4), 349369.

  • Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2011). Understanding work/life blending: Credibility implications for those who date at work. Communication Studies, 62(5), 563-580.

  • Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2013). Relational implications of gay and lesbian workplace romances: Understanding trust, deception, and credibility. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 50(2), 170-189.

  • Jones, G. E. (1999). Hierarchical workplace romance: An experimental examination of team member perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1057-1072.

  • Kakabadse, A. (2004). Intimacy: An international survey of the sex lives of people at work. Springer.

  • Kakabadse, N. and Kakabadse, A. (2004). Intimacy: International survey of the sex lives of people at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Lee, W.K. (1996). Development of moral thought, feeling and behaviour. American psychologist, 34 (10) 956–966

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual review of Sociology, 27(1), 363-385.

  • Lobel, S. A., Quinn, R. E., Clair, L. S., & Warfield, A. (1994). Love without sex: The impact of psychological intimacy between men and women at work. Organizational Dynamics, 23(1), 5- 16.

  • Loftus, M. 1995. Frisky Business - Romance in the Workplace. Psychology Today.

  • Mainiero, L. (1986). A review and analysis of power dynamics in organizational romances. Academy of Management Review 11, pp. 750–762.

  • Mainiero, L. A. (1989). Office romance: Love, power, and sex in the workplace Mainiero, L. A. (1993). Dangerous liaisons? A review of current issues concerning male and female romantic relationships in the workplace. Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity, 162-185.

  • Morgan, L. M., & Davidson, M. J. (2008). Sexual dynamics in mentoring relationships–a critical review. British Journal of Management, 19, S120-S129.

  • Neugarten, D. A., & Shafritz, J. M. (Eds.). (1980). Sexuality in organizations: Romantic and coercive behaviors at work. Moore Publishing Company.

  • Phillips, J. C., Ingram, K. M., Smith, N. G., & Mindes, E. J. (2003). Methodological and content review of lesbian-, gay-, and bisexual-related articles in counseling journals: 1990-1999. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(1), 25-62.

  • Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (2001). A framework for investigating the link between workplace romance and sexual harassment. Group & Organization Management, 26(2), 206-229.

  • Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (2003). Romantic relationships in organizations: A test of a model of formation and impact factors. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1, 161–169.

  • Pierce, C. A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H. (1996). Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 5-32.

  • Pierce, C. A., Karl, K. A., & Brey, E. T. (2012). Role of workplace romance policies and procedures on job pursuit intentions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(3), 237–263.

  • Powell, G. N. (2001). Workplace romances between senior-level executives and lower-level employees: An issue of work disruption and gender. Human Relations, 54(11), 1519-1544.

  • Powell, G. N., & Foley, S. Something. (1998) to talk about: Romantic relationships in organizational settings. Journal of Management, 24(3), 421–448.

  • Quinn, R. E. (1977). Coping with cupid: The formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 30–45.

  • Quinn, R. E., & Judge, N. A. (1978). The office romance: No bliss for the boss. Management review, 67(7), 43-49.

  • Rabin-Margalioth, S. (2006). Love at work. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 13, 237-253.

  • Riach, K., & Wilson, F. (2007). Don’t screw the crew: Exploring the rules of engagement in organizational romance. British Journal of Management, 18(1), 79–92.

  • Salvaggio, A. N., Streich, M., Hopper, J. E., & Pierce, C. A. (2011). Why Do Fools Fall in Love (at Work)? Factors Associated With the Incidence of Workplace Romance 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(4), 906-937.

  • Schaefer, C.M. and Tudor, T.R. (2001). Managing workplace romances. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 66, pp. 4–10.

  • Schultz, V. (2003). The sanitized workplace. Yale Law Journal, 112(8), 2061– 2193

  • Segal, M. W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction; An unobtmsive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654-657

  • Shareena, P., & Shahid, M. (2020). Work from home during COVID-19: Employees perception and experiences. Global journal for Research Analysis, 9(5), 1-4.

  • Shareena, P., & Shahid, M. (2020). Work from home during COVID-19: Employees perception and experiences. Global journal for Research Analysis, 9(5).

  • Shellenbarger, S. (2004, Feb 19). Office romance: The challenges of mixing business and pleasure. The Wall Street Journal, p. D1. 67.

  • Sheppard, J. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 617-627.

  • Smith, J. E., Waldorf, V. A., & Trembath, D. L. (1990). Single white male looking for thin, very attractive... Sex Roles, 23(11-12), 675-685.

  • Swartz, R., Warfield, A., & Wood, D. (1987). Co-worker romances: Impact on the work group and on career oriented women. Personnel.

  • Warfield, A. (1987). ‘Co-worker Romances: impact on the workgroup and on career oriented women’,Personnel,64(5),pp. 22–35.

  • Wilson, F. (2015). Romantic relationships at work: why love can hurt. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 1-19.

  • Wilson, R. J., Filosa, C., & Fennel, A. (2003). Romantic relationships at work: Does privacy trump the dating police. Def. Counsel. J., 70, 78.

  • Wittemann, H. (1993), The Interface Between Sexual Harassment and Organizational Romance’, in Kreps, G.L. (ed.) Sexual Harassment: Communications Implications, Annandale, VA: Hampton Press.


Abstract Views: 351

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Work from Home on Workplace Romance: A Socio-Economic Perspective

Abstract Views: 351  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Swati Mishra
Associate Professor in HR, United School of Business Management, Bhubaneswar, India
Ananya Mitra
Assistant Professor in Economics, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India

Abstract


There has been a lot of research work on Covid, but hardly any on impact of work from home (WfH) on workplace romance (WR). WR in organizations has been a controversial and debatable topic since early days. From the literature it was visible that researchers tried to analyze the impact of WR on organizational settings. In India the relationship is considered to be a forbidden taboo, especially in academic sector, where teachers are compared to the divine trinity – Brahma, Vishnu and Maheswar. But, with growing westernization and mushrooming of professional institutions with long working hours, the forbidden relationship was booming. Our study was carried out to examine the antecedents and consequences of workplace romance on various socio-economic variables, in Odisha before, during and post WfH scenario. A set of standard questionnaire on antecedents and consequences of WR was circulated. Data was collected from 230 samples consisting of 103 female and 127 male respondents from academic sector of Odisha. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of the data. The results of the study revealed that individuals got involved in workplace romance because of job insecurity (mostly in private institutes). Long working hour and outdoor activities promoted it. In the second phase that is during work from home same respondents were asked to predict whether work from home increases or decreases workplace romance. To which their reply was that it may reduce the workplace response. In the third and final phase i.e. post work from home the academicians (samples) were asked about the existing situation of Workplace romance. It was found out that employees continued to be engaged in workplace romance after work from home, as workplace romance was not only because of long working hours but also for their own life preferences. There was no positive relationship between workplace romance and efficiency/productivity, as many institutes were not able to capitalize on the relationship.

Keywords


Work from Home, Workplace Romance, Socioeconomic Variables.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2021%2Fv17%2Fi1%2F209033