Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Breaking Empirical Deadlocks in the Study of Partisanship:An Overview of Experimental Research Strategies


Affiliations
1 Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 420 W. 118th Street, 7th Floor IAB, New York, NY 10027, United States
 

The vast literature on party identification has gradually become bogged down by disputes about how to interpret observational data. This paper proposes the use of experimental designs to shed light on the responsiveness of party identification to short term forces such as retrospective performance evaluations. Examples of recent field experiments are used to illustrate two types of experimental designs and the assumptions on which they rest.

Keywords

Causal Inference, Field Experiments, Party Identification, Research Design.
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 137

PDF Views: 85




  • Breaking Empirical Deadlocks in the Study of Partisanship:An Overview of Experimental Research Strategies

Abstract Views: 137  |  PDF Views: 85

Authors

Donald P. Green
Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 420 W. 118th Street, 7th Floor IAB, New York, NY 10027, United States

Abstract


The vast literature on party identification has gradually become bogged down by disputes about how to interpret observational data. This paper proposes the use of experimental designs to shed light on the responsiveness of party identification to short term forces such as retrospective performance evaluations. Examples of recent field experiments are used to illustrate two types of experimental designs and the assumptions on which they rest.

Keywords


Causal Inference, Field Experiments, Party Identification, Research Design.