Optimization: Journal of Research in Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholders:An X-Ray of Rubber Research Institute Gashua


Affiliations
1 Department of Accounting, Federal University, Gashua, Nigeria
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Efforts are now made towards encouraging companies to respond to environmental and social issues in their host communities. This research evaluates the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on stakeholders of Rubber Research Institute in Gashua-Nigeria. The paper is anchored on the Stakeholder Theory as propounded by Freeman. The data for the study was sourced through primary and secondary means. The study revealed that, the Institute provided corporate activities for the host community in the areas of staff and farmers training. The institute has however failed to extend its services to the area of providing education and health facilities for the host community. The study concluded that, the institute’s CSR has helped to enhance healthy relationship between the host communities. The study therefore, recommends amongst other things that more corporate activities especially in the area of educational and health facilities should be provided to the host communities.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility, Rubber Research Institute, Stakeholder.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • • Alexander, G. & Bucholtz, R. (1978).Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 479-486.

  • • Berry, M.A. & Rondinelli, D.A. (1998). Proactive corporate environment management: A new industry revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38-50.

  • • Bowman, E.H. & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture towards CSR. California Management Review, 18(2), 49-58.

  • • Business (2016) http://www.tutor2u.net/business/reference/organisation-business-stakeholders-social-responsibility-ethics

  • • Carroll, A.B. (1979). The three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497-505.

  • • Clement, R.W. (2005). The lessons from stakeholder theory for US business lenders . Business Horizon, 48,255-264.

  • • Commission of the European Communities. (2001a). On the registration, measurement and disclosure of environmental issues in the annual accounts and the annual reports of companies. Official Journal of the European Communities L156/33 May 30.

  • • Commission of the European Communities. (2001b). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility . Green Paper, Brussels, COM, 366 Final, July 18.

  • • Committee for Economic Development (CED). (1971). Social responsibilities of business corporations (CED, New York). In: A.B. Carroll, Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of dimensional construct . Business and Society 38(3), 268-295.

  • • European Commission. (2002). Corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg..

  • • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pittman Publishing.

  • • Frynas, J.G. (2005). The false development promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies . International Affairs, 81, 581-598.

  • • GRI. (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www.proveandimprove.org/new/tools/griguidelines.php.

  • • Griffin, J.J. and Prakash, A.(2010). Corporate responsibility initiatives and mechanism. Business Society, 49(1), 179-184.

  • • Guobadia, A. (2000). Protecting minority and public interests in Nigeria company law: The corporate affairs commission as ombudsman. In: F. Mcmilan, ed. International Company Law Annual. Oxford Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.

  • • Hay, R.D., Gray, E.R. and Gates, J.E. (1976). Business and the society . Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing.

  • • ICAN. (2014). Corporate reporting. Berkshire: Emile Wolf International

  • • Jenkins, H. and Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environment disclosures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 271-284.

  • • Kenneth, M.A., Bongo, C.A., Chris, O. and Olufemi, O.A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria: Western mimicry or indigenous practices? International centre for social responsibility, ISSN 1479-5124

  • • Law, R. (ed). (1995). From slave to legitimate commerce: The commercial transition in nineteenth-century West Africa . London: Cambridge University Press.

  • • Luoma, P. and Goodstein, J., (1999). Stakeholder and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553-563.

  • • Orojo, J.O. (1992). Company law and practice in Nigeria, 3rd Ed., Lagos Nigeria: Mbeyi and Associates Nigeria Ltd.

  • • Juan P.J. (2008) Multinational corporations and the emerging network economy in Asia and the Pacific. Pacific Trade and Development Conference Series. Oxon: Routledge

  • • Shell Nigeria. (2009). Harnessing Nigeria’s gas. In: Friends of the earth Netherlands. (2011). Royal Dutch shell and its sustainability troubles, background report to the erratum report of shell’s annual report 2010.

  • • Shell Nigeria. (2010). The history and structure of shell. [Online] Retrieved from: http://Shell-nigeria.co.tv/#History.

  • • Shell. (2006). People and the environment . [Online] Available from: http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/ 2006_shell_nigeria_report.pdf.

  • • Shell. (2009). Sustainability Report. [Online] Retrieved from: http://sustainabilityreport.shell.com/2009/ouroperationsinfocus/nigeria.html.

  • • Shell. (2010). sustainability report. [Online] Retrieved from: http://sustainabilityreport.shell.com/2010/servicepages/downloads/files/all_shell_sr10.pdf.

  • • Siegel, D. and Mcwilliams, A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117-127.

  • • Total. (2010). The working of NNPC/ENPL National merit scholarship scheme: The brief history. [Online] Retrieved from: http:// www.ng.total.com/04_total_nigeria_activities/ 040602_scholarship_scheme.htm.

  • • Total. (2010). Nigeria downstream: History. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www.total.com.ng/os/osnigeria.nsf/VS_OPM/ 0E691C67E600B0D0C125710400312497?OpenDocument.

  • • UN Global Compact (1999). The Global Compact and International Labour Organization.

  • • Waddock, S.A., Bodwell, C. and Graves, S.B. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132-148.

  • • Wheeler, D., Fabig, H. and Boele, R. (2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive Ffirms in the extractive sector: Lessons from the case of shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics 39(3), 297-318.


Abstract Views: 247

PDF Views: 0




  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholders:An X-Ray of Rubber Research Institute Gashua

Abstract Views: 247  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abdulhamid Ellawule
Department of Accounting, Federal University, Gashua, Nigeria

Abstract


Efforts are now made towards encouraging companies to respond to environmental and social issues in their host communities. This research evaluates the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on stakeholders of Rubber Research Institute in Gashua-Nigeria. The paper is anchored on the Stakeholder Theory as propounded by Freeman. The data for the study was sourced through primary and secondary means. The study revealed that, the Institute provided corporate activities for the host community in the areas of staff and farmers training. The institute has however failed to extend its services to the area of providing education and health facilities for the host community. The study concluded that, the institute’s CSR has helped to enhance healthy relationship between the host communities. The study therefore, recommends amongst other things that more corporate activities especially in the area of educational and health facilities should be provided to the host communities.

Keywords


Corporate Social Responsibility, Rubber Research Institute, Stakeholder.

References