Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis on Haze Pollution and Legal Regulations in China based on Controlling Industrial Waste Gas Emission


Affiliations
1 School of Intellectual Property, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, 400054, China
2 Law school, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China
 

This paper utilizes the emission data of four kinds of waste gas which are closely linked with haze pollution from 2012 to 2013 in China (total emission of industrial sulphur dioxide, industrial smoke dust, industrial dust, and industrial waste gas) and analyses the fluctuation of industrial waste gas emission within the period, as well as the differences in spatial distribution in the 31 provinces, cities, and autonomous regions to understand the correlations between waste gas emission and the degree of haze pollution and between the industrial development levels of different provinces and haze pollution during the industrial development in China. The studies indicate that haze pollution is mainly caused by industrial waste gas discharge resulting from unreasonable industrial energy consumption structure. The yearly emission of industrial waste gas increases nearly five times greater in 2013 than in 2000. However, the emission of industrial smoke, dust, and industrial dust yearly decline, thereby reducing haze pollution. The emission of industrial sulphur dioxide slightly fluctuates, negatively affecting haze pollution reduction. The unequal development of Chinese industrial regions causes unequal haze pollution in regions. The provinces with a substantial share of heavy industry in economics have more serious haze pollution. This research improved our understanding of the correlation between waste gas discharged by industries and haze pollution. The conclusions obtained in this study can be used to explore energy conservation and emission reduction in industrial manufacturing to reduce haze pollution and guide the outline of specific legal regulations in controlling haze pollution.

Keywords

Haze Pollution, Industrial Pollution, Legal Regulation.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allan, G., Lecca, P. and McGregor, P. et al. 2014. The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Ecological Economics, 100(100): 40-50.
  • Birdsall, N. and Wheeler, D. 1993. Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? The Journal of Environment & Development, 2(1): 137-149.
  • Chen, T. C. and Lin, C. F. 2008. Greenhouse gases emissions from waste management practices using Life Cycle Inventory model. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 155(1): 23-31.
  • Cowell, D. and Apsimon, H. 1996. Estimating the cost of damage to buildings by acidifying atmospheric pollution in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 30(17): 2959-2968.
  • De Leeuw, F. A. A. M., Moussiopoulos, N. and Sahm P. et al. 2001. Urban air quality in larger conurbations in the European Union. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16(4): 399-414.
  • Dong, B., Gong, J. and Zhao, X. 2012. FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 41(2): 216-237.
  • Liu, W. Q., Gan, L. and Zhang, X. L. 2002. Cost-competitive incentives for wind energy development in China: institutional dynamics and policy changes. Energy Policy, 30(9): 753-765.
  • Mirasgedis, S., Hontou, V. and Georgopoulou, E. et al. 2008. Environmental damage costs from airborne pollution of industrial activities in the greater Athens, Greece area and the resulting benefits from the introduction of BAT. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(1): 39-56.
  • Mirshojaeian Hosseini, H. and Rahbar, F. 2011. Spatial environmental Kuznets curve for Asian countries: study of CO2 and PM10. J Environ Stud, 37(58): 1-14.
  • Muller, N. Z. and Mendelsohn, R. 2009. Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. The American Economic Review, 99(5): 1714-1739.
  • Mushkat, R. 2014. Environmental cooperation in southeast Asia: ASEAN’s regime for transboundary haze pollution. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 15(1): 236-255.
  • Soytas, U., Sari, R. and Ewing, B. T. 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62(3): 482-489.
  • Verhoef, E. T. and Nijkamp, P. 2002. Externalities in urban sustainability: environmental versus localization-type agglomeration externalities in a general spatial equilibrium model of a singlesector monocentric industrial city. Ecological Economics, 40(2): 157-179.

Abstract Views: 108

PDF Views: 0




  • Analysis on Haze Pollution and Legal Regulations in China based on Controlling Industrial Waste Gas Emission

Abstract Views: 108  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ting Zhang
School of Intellectual Property, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, 400054, China
Feng Xiao
Law school, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China

Abstract


This paper utilizes the emission data of four kinds of waste gas which are closely linked with haze pollution from 2012 to 2013 in China (total emission of industrial sulphur dioxide, industrial smoke dust, industrial dust, and industrial waste gas) and analyses the fluctuation of industrial waste gas emission within the period, as well as the differences in spatial distribution in the 31 provinces, cities, and autonomous regions to understand the correlations between waste gas emission and the degree of haze pollution and between the industrial development levels of different provinces and haze pollution during the industrial development in China. The studies indicate that haze pollution is mainly caused by industrial waste gas discharge resulting from unreasonable industrial energy consumption structure. The yearly emission of industrial waste gas increases nearly five times greater in 2013 than in 2000. However, the emission of industrial smoke, dust, and industrial dust yearly decline, thereby reducing haze pollution. The emission of industrial sulphur dioxide slightly fluctuates, negatively affecting haze pollution reduction. The unequal development of Chinese industrial regions causes unequal haze pollution in regions. The provinces with a substantial share of heavy industry in economics have more serious haze pollution. This research improved our understanding of the correlation between waste gas discharged by industries and haze pollution. The conclusions obtained in this study can be used to explore energy conservation and emission reduction in industrial manufacturing to reduce haze pollution and guide the outline of specific legal regulations in controlling haze pollution.

Keywords


Haze Pollution, Industrial Pollution, Legal Regulation.

References