MVP Journal of Medical Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Clinical Study of Peptic Ulcer Perforation


Affiliations
1 Department of General Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik - 422003, India
 

Background: Perforation is one of the most important complications of a peptic ulcer. In spite of modern management, it is still a life threatening emergency. Operative method is still the treatment of choice and simple closure of perforation with Graham’s patch is an established procedure of choice in our institution. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 30 diagnosed patients of perforated peptic ulcer at Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik to study the clinical profile and clinical outcome of peptic ulcer perforation patients post operatively from August 2014 to December 2016. Results: A total of 30 patients were included, majority of patients presented in the 4th decade of life and 88.67% were males, 76.67% of the total patients had positive history suggestive of peptic ulcer disease and 36.66% patients had associated co morbidities, (36.67%) had severe dehydration, 10% patients presented with hypotension, with a systolic blood pressure of less than 90mmHg. In 23.33% of patients surgery was performed within 5 days of onset of acute abdominal pain and 16.67% presented with severe contamination of the peritoneal cavity, 33.33% presented with gastric perforation and 66.67% presented with duodenal perforation. 30% patients suffered from post operative wound infection and 30% patients suffered from post-operative respiratory infections. 16.67% patients presented with post operative sepsis. The mortality rate in this study was 10%. Conclusion: Perforated peptic ulcer is one of the most commonest acute abdominal emergencies. The outcome of the patient depends on the age of the patient, associated co morbidities, time interval between acute abdominal pain and surgery, timely resuscitation, contamination of the abdomen and post operative sepsis.

Keywords

Outcome, Peptic Ulcer, Perforation, Time Interval between Onset of Acute Abdominal Pain and Surgery.
Font Size

User
Notifications

  • Baron JH. Paintress, Princess and Physician’s Paramour: Poison or perforation? J R Soc Med. 1998; 91(4):213–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689809100413 PMid : 9659312 PMCid : PMC1296646

  • Baron JH. Peptic ulcer. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. 2000; 67(1):58–62. PMid:10677783

  • Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Munshi S. Prevalance of peptic ulcer in India: An endoscopic and epidemiological study in urban Kashmir. GUT. 1989; 30:930–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.30.7.930 PMid:2788113 PMCid:PMC1434311

  • Thorsen K, Soreide JA, Kvaloy JT, Glomsaker T, Soreide K. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan; 19(3):347–54. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.347 PMid:23372356 PMCid:PMC3554818

  • Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J, et al. Laproscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: A prospective multicentre clinical trial. Surg Endos. 1997; 11:1017–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900515

  • Kocer B, Surmeli S, Solak C, Unal B, Bozkurt B,Yildirim O, et al. Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22:565–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14401746.2006.04500.x PMid:17376052

  • Rajesh V, Chandra SS, Smile SR. Risk factors predicting operative mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Trop Gastroenterol. 2003; 2:148–50.

  • Hannan ABMA, Islam B, Hussain M, Haque MM, Kudrat-E-Khuda MI. Early complications of suture closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. The Journal of Teachers Association. 2005 Dec; 18(2).

  • Gulzar J, Paruthy S, Satya A. Improving outcome in perforated peptic ulcer emergency surgery by Boey scoring. Int Surg J. 2016Nov; 3(4):2120–8. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163585

  • Thorsen K, Soreide JA, Soreide K. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Scand J Trauma Resuse Emerg Med. 2013; 21:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-25 PMid:23574922 PMCid:PMC3626602

  • Suprapaneni S, Rajkumar S, Bhaskar V. The perforation operation time interval: An imortant mortality indicator in peptic ulcer perforation. JCDR. 2013; 7(5):880–2.

  • Dakubo JC, Naaeder SB, Clegg-Lamptey JN. Gastro duodenal peptic ulcer perforation. East Afr Med J. 2009; 86(3):100–9. PMid:19702096

  • Lohsiriwat V, Prapasrivorakul S, Lohsiriwat D. Perforated peptic ulcer; clinical presentation, surgical outcomes and the accuracy of the boey scoring system in predicting post operative morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 200; 33(1):80–5.

  • Menekse E, Kocer B, Topcu R, Olmez A, Tez M. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2015; 10:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0008-7 PMid:25722739 PMCid:PMC4341864


Abstract Views: 358

PDF Views: 89




  • A Clinical Study of Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Abstract Views: 358  |  PDF Views: 89

Authors

Usha Prakash Vaswani
Department of General Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik - 422003, India
Sudhir Bhamre
Department of General Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik - 422003, India

Abstract


Background: Perforation is one of the most important complications of a peptic ulcer. In spite of modern management, it is still a life threatening emergency. Operative method is still the treatment of choice and simple closure of perforation with Graham’s patch is an established procedure of choice in our institution. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 30 diagnosed patients of perforated peptic ulcer at Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik to study the clinical profile and clinical outcome of peptic ulcer perforation patients post operatively from August 2014 to December 2016. Results: A total of 30 patients were included, majority of patients presented in the 4th decade of life and 88.67% were males, 76.67% of the total patients had positive history suggestive of peptic ulcer disease and 36.66% patients had associated co morbidities, (36.67%) had severe dehydration, 10% patients presented with hypotension, with a systolic blood pressure of less than 90mmHg. In 23.33% of patients surgery was performed within 5 days of onset of acute abdominal pain and 16.67% presented with severe contamination of the peritoneal cavity, 33.33% presented with gastric perforation and 66.67% presented with duodenal perforation. 30% patients suffered from post operative wound infection and 30% patients suffered from post-operative respiratory infections. 16.67% patients presented with post operative sepsis. The mortality rate in this study was 10%. Conclusion: Perforated peptic ulcer is one of the most commonest acute abdominal emergencies. The outcome of the patient depends on the age of the patient, associated co morbidities, time interval between acute abdominal pain and surgery, timely resuscitation, contamination of the abdomen and post operative sepsis.

Keywords


Outcome, Peptic Ulcer, Perforation, Time Interval between Onset of Acute Abdominal Pain and Surgery.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms%2F2018%2Fv5%2Fi1%2F9903