Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Potential Enablers of Knowledge Collaboration in Ego-Centered Networks of Professionals: Transactive Memory, Trust, and Reciprocity


Affiliations
1 Massey University, New Zealand
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In many knowledge intensive professions, knowledge workers coordinate specialised advice from other knowledge experts to resolve non-routine problems at work. For speedy, reliable, and economic access to the relevant knowledge, modern knowledge workers develop and maintain ties with other knowledge experts. Such personal ties between knowledge workers develop irrespective of the organisational boundaries and formal structures, and are known as ego-centered networks of professionals. Knowledge sharing research has found personal connections between knowledge workers an important means of information and knowledge transfer among professionals. So far, little is known how knowledge workers transform their personal connections into useful knowledge collaboration, and how they manage the risk and complexities involved in interactions in the absence of formal structures and organisational control mechanisms. Prior studies have indicated the use of transactive memory systems in coordinating specialized knowledge to resolve problems collaboratively. Knowledge management researchers have emphasized the role of trust in sharing knowledge through social means. Informal information trading literature highlights the role of reciprocity in knowledge sharing through social means. Building on theories of transactive memory systems, social exchange, and trust; this paper presents a theoretical model to explain how informal knowledge sharing relationships develop and sustain among professionals. The paper argues that transactive memory, trust, and reciprocity delineate informal structures within egocentered networks of professionals to allow them sharing of know-how and expertise with each other.

Keywords

Knowledge Sharing, Ego-Centered Networks, Transactive Memory, Trust, Reciprocity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abrams, Lisa C., Rob Cross, Eric Lesser, and Daniel Z. Levin. 2003. Nurturing Interpersonal Trust in Knowledge-Sharing Networks. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005) 17 (4):64-77.
  • Alavi, Maryam, and Dorothy E. Leidner. 2001. Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly 25 (1):107-136.
  • Allen, Thomas J., James D. Andrew, and Gamlen Phil. 2007. Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: a case study using social network analysis. R&D Management 37 (3):179-196.
  • Anand, Vikas, Charles C. Manz, and William H. Glick. 1998. An Organizational Memory Approach to Information Management. The Academy of Management Review 23 (4):796-809.
  • Assimakopoulos, Dimitris, and Jie Yan. 2006. Sources of knowledge acquisition for Chinese software engineers. R&D Management 36 (1):97-106.
  • Borgatti, Stephen P., and Rob Cross. 2003. A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks. Management Science 49 (4):432-445.
  • Brandon, David P., and Andrea B. Hollingshead. 2004. Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People. Organization Science 15 (6):633-644.
  • Chiu, Chao-Min, Meng-Hsiang Hsu, and Eric T. G. Wang. 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42 (3):1872-1888.
  • Chowdhury, Sanjib. 2005. The Role of Affect- and Cognition-based Trust in Complex Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues 17 (3):310-326.
  • Constant, David, Sara Kiesler, and Lee Sproull. 1994. What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing. Information Systems Research 5 (4):400-421.
  • Cowan, R., and N. Jonard. 2003. The dynamics of collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 52 (4):513-532.
  • Cropanzano, Russell, and Marie S. Mitchell. 2005. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management 31 (6):874-900.
  • Cross, Rob, and N. Cummings Jonathon. 2004. Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work. The Academy of Management Journal 47 (6):928-937.
  • Cross, Rob, Andrew Parker, Laurence Prusak, and Stephen P. Borgatti. 2001. Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks. Organizational Dynamics 30 (2):100-120.
  • Cross, Rob, and Lee Sproull. 2004. More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge. Organization Science 15 (4):446-462.
  • Cummings, Jonathon N. 2004. Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Management Science 50 (3):352-364.
  • Cummings, Jonathon N., and Rob Cross. 2003. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks 25 (3):197-210.
  • Dahl, Michael S., and Christian Ø R. Pedersen. 2004. Social networks in the R&D process: the case of the wireless communication industry around Aalborg, Denmark. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22 (1-2):75-92.
  • Davenport, Thomas H., and Laurence Prusak. 2000. Working knowledge : how organizations manage what they know. New ed. Boston, Mass. New York: Harvard Business School McGraw-Hill.
  • Fleming, Lee, and Koen Frenken. 2007. The evolution of inventor networks in the Silicon Valley and Boston regions. Advances in Complex Systems 10 (1):53-71.
  • Ghaznavi, Mahmood Q.K., Martin Perry, Keri Logan, and Paul Toulson. 2011. Knowledge Sharing in Ego-centered Knowledge Networks of Professionals: Role of Transactive Memory Systems, Trust, and Reciprocity. In ICICKM 2011. Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Granovetter, Mark. 2005. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1):33-50.
  • Hansen, Morten T. 1999. The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1):82-111.
  • Hansen, Morten T. 2002. Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies. Organization Science 13 (3):232-248.
  • Hsu, Meng-Hsiang, Teresa L. Ju, Chia-Hui Yen, and Chun-Ming Chang. 2007. Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(2):153-169.
  • Jackson, Paul, and Jane Klobas. 2008. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories. Decision Support Systems 44 (2):409-424.
  • Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L., and Ann Majchrzak. 2008. Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks. Organization Science 19 (2):260-276.
  • Jason, Owen-Smith, and Walter W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science 15 (1):5-21.
  • Kramer, Roderick Moreland, and Karen S. Cook, eds. 2004. Trust and distrust in organizations: dilemmas and approaches, The Russell Sage Foundation series on trust ; v. 7. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning : legitimate peripheral participation, Learning in doing. Cambridge England New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lawson, Benn, Kenneth J. Petersen, Paul D. Cousins, and Robert B. Handfield. 2009. Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (2):156-172.
  • Lee, Gwendolyn K., and Robert E. Cole. 2003. From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organization Science 14 (6):633-649.
  • Levin, Daniel Z., and Rob Cross. 2004. The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science 50 (11):1477-1490.
  • Lewis, Kyle, Donald Lange, and Lynette Gillis. 2005. Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer. Organization Science 16 (6):581-598.
  • Lin, Ming-Ji James, Shiu-Wan Hung, and Chih-Jou Chen. 2009. Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (4):929-939.
  • Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review 20 (3):709-734.
  • McEvily, Bill, Vincenzo Perrone, and Akbar Zaheer. 2003. Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science 14 (1):91-103.
  • Oshri, Ilan, Paul Van Fenema, and Julia Kotlarsky. 2008. Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory. Information Systems Journal 18 (6):593-616.
  • Reagans, Ray, and Bill McEvily. 2003. Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2):240-267.
  • Ridings, Catherine M., David Gefen, and Bay Arinze. 2002. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (3-4):271-295.
  • Riege, Andreas. 2005. Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (3):18-35.
  • Rogers, Everett M. 1982. Information exchange and technological innovation. In The transfer and utilization of technical knowledge, edited by D. Sahal. Lexington: Lexington Books.
  • Russell, Cropanzano, and S. Mitchell Marie. 2005. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management 31 (6):874-900.
  • Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1991. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy 20 (5):423-437.
  • Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional advantage : culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. 1st Harvard University Press pbk. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Schrader, Stephan. 1991. Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Research Policy 20 (2):153-170.
  • Schrader, Stephan. 1995. Gaining advantage by leaking information: Informal information trading. European Management Journal 13 (2):156-163.
  • Teigland, Robin, and Molly McLure Wasko. 2003. Integrating Knowledge through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance*. Decision Sciences 34 (2):261-286.
  • Tsai, Wenpin, and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1998. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. The Academy of Management Journal 41 (4):464-476.
  • von Hippel, Eric. 1987. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16 (6):291-302.
  • von Hippel, Eric, and Georg von Krogh. 2003. Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science. Organization Science 14 (2):209-223.
  • Walter, Jorge, Christoph Lechner, and Franz W. Kellermanns. 2007. Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital. Journal of Business Research 60 (7):698-710.
  • Wasko, Molly McLure, and Samer Faraj. 2000. "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2-3):155-173.
  • Wasko, Molly McLure, Samer Faraj, and Robin Teigland. 2004. Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (11/12):493-513.
  • Wegner, Daniel M. 1987. Transactive M.emory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind. Theories of group behavior:185-208.
  • Wegner, Daniel M., Ralph Erber, and Paula Raymond. 1991. Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 61 (6):923-929.
  • Zaheer, Akbar, Bill McEvily, and Vincenzo Perrone. 1998. Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organization Science 9 (2):141-159.

Abstract Views: 211

PDF Views: 0




  • Potential Enablers of Knowledge Collaboration in Ego-Centered Networks of Professionals: Transactive Memory, Trust, and Reciprocity

Abstract Views: 211  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mahmood ul Quddus Khan Ghaznavi
Massey University, New Zealand
Martin Perry
Massey University, New Zealand
Paul Toulson
Massey University, New Zealand
Keri Logan
Massey University, New Zealand

Abstract


In many knowledge intensive professions, knowledge workers coordinate specialised advice from other knowledge experts to resolve non-routine problems at work. For speedy, reliable, and economic access to the relevant knowledge, modern knowledge workers develop and maintain ties with other knowledge experts. Such personal ties between knowledge workers develop irrespective of the organisational boundaries and formal structures, and are known as ego-centered networks of professionals. Knowledge sharing research has found personal connections between knowledge workers an important means of information and knowledge transfer among professionals. So far, little is known how knowledge workers transform their personal connections into useful knowledge collaboration, and how they manage the risk and complexities involved in interactions in the absence of formal structures and organisational control mechanisms. Prior studies have indicated the use of transactive memory systems in coordinating specialized knowledge to resolve problems collaboratively. Knowledge management researchers have emphasized the role of trust in sharing knowledge through social means. Informal information trading literature highlights the role of reciprocity in knowledge sharing through social means. Building on theories of transactive memory systems, social exchange, and trust; this paper presents a theoretical model to explain how informal knowledge sharing relationships develop and sustain among professionals. The paper argues that transactive memory, trust, and reciprocity delineate informal structures within egocentered networks of professionals to allow them sharing of know-how and expertise with each other.

Keywords


Knowledge Sharing, Ego-Centered Networks, Transactive Memory, Trust, Reciprocity.

References