Journal of Physics & Astronomy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Time Dependent Interface in AdS Black Hole Spacetime


Affiliations
1 Department of Physics, Toho University, Funabashi, Japan
 

We consider a D5-brane solution in AdS black hole spacetime. This is a defect solution moving in subspace of AdS5 × S5. This non-local object is realized by the probe D5-brane moving in black hole spacetime. Here we consider the D5-brane which attaches at two points on the AdS boundary which are interpreted as two interfaces in the boundary gauge theories. We found this probe brane does not reach the black hole horizon and its configuration is limited to the outside of the horizon. We also found the solution does not depend on the motion on S5 subspace.

Keywords

Quantum, AdS Black Hole, Angular Velocity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Maldacena JM (1999) The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Int j theor phys. 38(4):1113-33.

  • E. Witten (1998) “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv Theor Math Phys.253-291.

  • Gubser SS, Klebanov IR, Polyakov AM (1998). Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory. Phys Lett B. 428(1-2):105-14.

  • Nagasaki K, Tanida H, Yamaguchi S (2012). Holographic interface-particle potential. J High Energy Phys. (1):1-7.

  • Karch A, Katz E (2002). Adding flavor to AdS/CFT. J High Energy Phys. (6):043.

  • NR Constable, J Erdmenger, Z Guralnik et al, (2013) “Intersecting D-3 branes and holography,” Phys. Rev. 68:106007.

  • N Evans, A Gebauer, KY Kim et al, (2011) “Phase diagram of the D3/D5 system in a magnetic field and a BKT transition,” Phys. Lett. B698:91-95.

  • SR Das, T Nishioka, T Takayanagi (2010) “Probe Branes, Time-dependent Couplings and Thermalization in AdS/CFT” J High Energy Phys. (7):1-42.

  • S Banerjee, U Danielsson, G Dibitetto et al, (2018) “Emergent de Sitter Cosmology from Decaying Anti-de Sitter Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121;26:261301.

  • Banerjee S, Danielsson U, Dibitetto G et al. (2019) de Sitter Cosmology on an expanding bubble. J High Energy Phys. (10):1-9.

  • Susskind L (2012) Singularities, firewalls, and complementarity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.3445.

  • Almheiri A, Marolf D, Polchinski J et al. (2013) Black holes: complementarity or firewalls? J High Energy Phys. (2):1-20.

  • Susskind L (2016) Entanglement is not enough. Fortsch Phys.64(1):49-71.

  • L. Susskind (2016) “Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons,” Fortsch Phys. 64:24-43.

  • Osborne TJ. Hamiltonian complexity. Rep prog phys. 75(2):022001.

  • Watrous J (2008). Quantum computational complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:0804.3401.

  • Arora S, Barak B (2009) Computational complexity: a modern approach. Cambridge University Press.

  • C. Moore, S. Mertens (2011) “The Nature of Computation”. Oxford University Press.

  • Caputa P, Kundu N, Miyaji M et al. (2017) Liouville action as path-integral complexity: from continuous tensor networks to AdS/CFT. J High Energy Phys. (11):1-56.

  • Hashimoto K, Iizuka N, Sugishita S (2018) Thoughts on holographic complexity and its basis dependence. Phys Rev D. (4):046002.

  • Bhattacharyya A, Caputa P, Das SR et al, (2018) Path-integral complexity for perturbed CFTs. J High Energy Phys. (7):1-26.

  • A Einstein, N Rosen (1935) “The particle problem in the general theory of relativity,” Phys. Rev. 48:73-77.

  • Brown AR, Roberts DA, Susskind L et al. (2016) Holographic complexity equals bulk action? Phys rev lett. 116(19):191301.

  • Brown AR, Roberts DA, Susskind L et al. (2016) Complexity, action, and black holes. Phys Rev D. 93(8):086006.

  • Nagasaki K (2017) Complexity of AdS 5 black holes with a rotating string. Phys Rev D. 96(12):126018.

  • Nagasaki K (2020) Interface in AdS black hole spacetime. Pro. Theor Exp Phys. (2):023B06.

  • Nagasaki K (2019) Interface in Kerr-AdS black hole spacetime. Phys Rev D. 100(6):066032.

  • Hubeny VE (2012) Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT. J High Energy Phys. (7):1-46.

  • Janiszewski S, Karch A (2011) Moving defects in AdS/CFT. J High Energy Phys. (11):1-21.

  • Gubser SS (2006) Drag force in AdS/CFT. Phys Rev D. 74(12):126005.

  • Alishahiha M (2015) Holographic complexity. Phys Rev D. 92(12):126009.

  • Stanford D, Susskind L (2014). Complexity and shock wave geometries. Phys Rev D. 90(12):126007.

  • Abad FJ, Kulaxizi M, Parnachev A (2018) On complexity of holographic flavors. J High Energy Phys. (1):1-8.


Abstract Views: 208

PDF Views: 1




  • Time Dependent Interface in AdS Black Hole Spacetime

Abstract Views: 208  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Koichi Nagasaki
Department of Physics, Toho University, Funabashi, Japan

Abstract


We consider a D5-brane solution in AdS black hole spacetime. This is a defect solution moving in subspace of AdS5 × S5. This non-local object is realized by the probe D5-brane moving in black hole spacetime. Here we consider the D5-brane which attaches at two points on the AdS boundary which are interpreted as two interfaces in the boundary gauge theories. We found this probe brane does not reach the black hole horizon and its configuration is limited to the outside of the horizon. We also found the solution does not depend on the motion on S5 subspace.

Keywords


Quantum, AdS Black Hole, Angular Velocity.

References