Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Marketing Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Jaggery in Kolhapur District of Maharashtra


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, College of Agriculture, Kolhapur (M.S.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Shreemant Shivajiraje College of Horticulture, Phaltan, Satara (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was a modest attempt to marketing analysis of organic and inorganic jaggery production in the Kolhapur district of Maharashtra in 2011-12. In marketing of jaggery, three marketing channels were identified in the study area. They were Channel-I: Producer → Primary Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer, Channel-II: Producer → Commission agent → Secondary Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer and Channel-III: Producer → Commission agent → Distant Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer. The quantity sold through the channel-III was more than channel-I and channel-II for both of category. It is also examine that the marketing cost in channel III (Rs. 516.32) was relatively high as compared to channel II (Rs.383.58) and channel I (Rs.330.48) for organic jaggery the same results were observed in case of inorganic jaggery i.e. marketing cost in channel III (Rs. 482.15) was relatively high as compared to channel II (Rs. 352.37) and channel I (Rs. 286.93). This may be due to relatively more transportation, commission, packaging, unloading and loading charges in case of Channel III than Channel II and Channel I.At overall level the price spread was Rs. 988.66 and 939.46 for organic and inorganic jaggery, respectively. The channel wise price paid was the highest as Rs. 1208.69 in channel-III, followed by Rs .981.48 in channel-II and Rs. 775.82 in channel-I in organic jaggery whereas for inorganic jaggery it was Rs. 1158.30 in channel-III, followed by Rs. 916.89 in channel-II and Rs. 743.18 in channel-I, respectively. At overall level marketing efficiency of organic and inorganic jaggery was 127.44 per cent and 128.51 per cent, respectively.

Keywords

Marketing Channel, Marketing Cost, Price Spread, Market Margin, Marketing Efficiency.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2011). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2011.Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
  • Archna, Roh B. S., Gupta, M. K. and Baliyan, S. P. (1995). Study of cost and margin over time in the marketing of gur. (1980-81 to 1991-92). Indian J. Agric. Mktg., Conference special.
  • Guddadamath, S. G., Sanjay, B., Patil, S. B., Khadi, B. M. and Chandrashekar, C. P. (2014). Genetic enhancement of sugarcane for the production of organic jaggery, Springer Sugar Tech.,16 (1): 86-91.
  • Imandi,Venkata and Yoga, Ramarao (2011). An economic appraisal of manufacturing and marketing of jaggery in Andhra Pradesh state, India Sugar Tech., 13 (3): 236-244.
  • Kallappa, M. A.(2011). Production and marketing of jaggery in north Karnataka - An Economic analysis. Ph. D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Dharwad, Karnataka, 86-107.
  • Lal, J. (1980). Costs, margin and price spread of Gur and Khandasari. Agric. Mktg., 22 (4): 1-3.
  • Lohar, N. S. and Babar, V. S. (2003). Economics of production and marketing of jaggery in Kolhapur district.Agresco report, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri (M.S.) India, 41-66.
  • Maheswarappa, B. O.,Kunnal, L. B. and Patil, S. M.(1998). Economics of production and marketing of sugar cane in Karnataka. Bihar J. Agric. Mktg., 6 (2): 238 244.
  • Mandal, D., Tudu, S., Mitra, S.R. and De, G.C. (2006). Effect of common packaging materials on keeping quality of sugarcane jaggery during monsoon season. Sugar Technol., 8: 137-142.
  • Nawadkar, D. S., Mali, B. K. and Birari, K. S. (2002). An economic analysis of arrivals and prices of jaggery in Shahu market Kolhapur. National Seminar on Jaggery Marketing in India.
  • Rao, K.P.C. and Ravikumar, K.N. (2005). Production and marketing of jaggery in India with reference to Andhra Pradesh. Agric. Mktg., 47 (4) : 39-43.
  • Rohal, B. S., Guptha, M. K. and Singh, R. P. (1985). Processing and marketing of sugarcane product (Gur)-A case study of Muzaffarnagar district. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 40 (3): 429.
  • Roy, S. C. (1951). Results of crushing tests of bullock power cane crushers. Monograph on the gur industry of India. Indian Institute of Sugar Technology, 1951, pp. 270-271
  • Shaikh, I. N. (2013). Economics of production and marketing of jaggery in Latur district. M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, M.S., India, pp. 32-55.
  • Singh, J. (1998). Jaggery and Khandsari Research Digest. IISR (JKCell)/Tech.Bull./98-39, IISR Lucknow (U.P.) India.
  • Suryawanshi, S.D., Lohar, N.S. and Gore, S.K. (1994). Economics, marketing and export potential of jaggery in Western Maharashtra. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 49 (3): 451.
  • Teggi, M. Y., Basavaraj, H. Hiremat, G.K. and Poddar, R.S. (1996). Marketing of jaggery in Ghataprabha command area. Bihar J. Agric. Mktg., 6 (1): 101-107.
  • Verma, A. R. (1989). Economics of processing and marketing of Gur in district Indore (M.P.). Indian J. Agric. Econ., 44 (3) : 319.

Abstract Views: 182

PDF Views: 0




  • Marketing Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Jaggery in Kolhapur District of Maharashtra

Abstract Views: 182  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

N. M. Malkunje
Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, College of Agriculture, Kolhapur (M.S.), India
J. V. Lembhe
Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Shreemant Shivajiraje College of Horticulture, Phaltan, Satara (M.S.), India
H. V. Kharat
Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, College of Agriculture, Kolhapur (M.S.), India

Abstract


The present study was a modest attempt to marketing analysis of organic and inorganic jaggery production in the Kolhapur district of Maharashtra in 2011-12. In marketing of jaggery, three marketing channels were identified in the study area. They were Channel-I: Producer → Primary Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer, Channel-II: Producer → Commission agent → Secondary Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer and Channel-III: Producer → Commission agent → Distant Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer. The quantity sold through the channel-III was more than channel-I and channel-II for both of category. It is also examine that the marketing cost in channel III (Rs. 516.32) was relatively high as compared to channel II (Rs.383.58) and channel I (Rs.330.48) for organic jaggery the same results were observed in case of inorganic jaggery i.e. marketing cost in channel III (Rs. 482.15) was relatively high as compared to channel II (Rs. 352.37) and channel I (Rs. 286.93). This may be due to relatively more transportation, commission, packaging, unloading and loading charges in case of Channel III than Channel II and Channel I.At overall level the price spread was Rs. 988.66 and 939.46 for organic and inorganic jaggery, respectively. The channel wise price paid was the highest as Rs. 1208.69 in channel-III, followed by Rs .981.48 in channel-II and Rs. 775.82 in channel-I in organic jaggery whereas for inorganic jaggery it was Rs. 1158.30 in channel-III, followed by Rs. 916.89 in channel-II and Rs. 743.18 in channel-I, respectively. At overall level marketing efficiency of organic and inorganic jaggery was 127.44 per cent and 128.51 per cent, respectively.

Keywords


Marketing Channel, Marketing Cost, Price Spread, Market Margin, Marketing Efficiency.

References