Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of Newer Insecticides against Leaf Hopper on Bt Cotton


Affiliations
1 Cotton Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
2 Zonal Agriculture Research Station, Yavatmal (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Evaluation studies were carried out for management of leaf hoppers on Bt cotton during 2012-13 at three different locations. The pooled results revealed that minimum population of leaf hoppers was recorded in the treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) and it was at par with treatment diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) and imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%). Next best treatment was buprofezin 25 SC (0.05%). Significantly highest seed cotton yield of 19.43 q/ha was harvested in application of treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) followed by diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) and imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) with 18.66 and 18.19 quintal per hectar, respectively. Highest monetary return Rs. 33,409 per ha was also observed in the treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) (Rs. 30113 per ha) and diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) (Rs. 28340 per ha) whereas in terms of higher incremental cost benefit ratio, imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) was found superior which recorded 1: 13.3 followed by fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) (1: 8.9).

Keywords

Leaf Hopper, Bt Cotton, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, Diafenthiuron.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • AICCIP (2009). Annual report All India Coordinated Cotton Improvement Project. Central Institute of Cotton Research, Coimbatore.
  • Choudhary, R.K., Tomar, S.P.S., Shrivastava, V.K. and Yadav, A.S. (2005). Studies on field evaluation of imidacloprid (Confidor 17.8 SL) against sucking pests of cotton in rainfed condition. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 19(2):241-243.
  • Dhawan, A.K., Sidhu, A.S. and Simwat, G.S. (1988). Assessment of avoidable loss in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium arboreum) due to sucking pests and bollworms. Indian. J. Agric. Sci., 58 (4) : 290-99.
  • Elbart, A., Becker, B., Hastwig, J. and Erdelen, C. (1991). Imidacloprid a new systemic insecticide. PflSchutzNachr, Bayer, 44 : 113-36.
  • Gul, F. (1998). Evaluation of different insecticides and cultivars against jassids in okra. Sarhad J. Agric., 14 (4) : 351-354.
  • Kumar, K. and Santharam, G. (1999). Effect of imidacloprid against aphids and leafhoppers on cotton. Annls.Pl.Prot.Sci., 7 (2) : 248-250.
  • Mayee, C.D. (2011). Indian Cotton Welcomes WCRC-5. World Cotton Research Conference. The Renaissance Mumbai Hotel and Conservation Center, India: 1-6.
  • Mohan, M. and Katiyar, K.N. (2000). Impact of different insecticides used for bollworm control on the population of jassids and whitefly in cotton. Pesticide.Res.J., 12 (1) : 99102.
  • Patil, B.V. and Rajanikanth, R. (2004). New class of insecticides, mode of action and their bioefficacy. Paper presented in Int. Symo. Strat. Sust. Cotton Prod. A Global Vision., November 23-25, p. 77-85.
  • Patil, S.B., Udikeri, S.S., Matti, P.V., Guruprasad, G.S., Hirekurubar, R.B., Shaila H.M. and Vandal N.B. (2009). Bioefficacy of new molecule fipronil 5% SC against sucking pest complex in Bt cotton. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22 (5): 1029-1031.
  • Raghuramn, M., Birah, Ajanta and Gupta, G.P. (2008). Bioefficacy of acetamiprid on sucking pest in cotton. Indian J. Entomol., 70 (4) : 319-325.
  • Shashikant, S., Udikeri, Patil, S.B. and Naik, L.K. (2010). Confidor 350 SC: A new imidacloprid formulation for cotton sucking pests. Pestol., 34 :26-29.
  • Singh, J., Simwat, G.S., Brar, K.S. and Sohi, A.S. (2002). Efficacy of acetamiprid (N 125) against cotton jassids on American cotton. Insect Environ., 8 (3) : 100-101.
  • Sinha, S.R., Singh, Rai and Sharma, R.K. (2007). Management of insect pests of okra through insecticides and intercropping. Ann. Pl. Prot. Sci., 15 (2) : 321-324.
  • Siwach, S.S. and Sangwan, R. . (2012). Performance of hybrids produced by different systems for yield and quality in Gossypium hirsutum L. "Silver Jubilee International Symposium on Global Cotton Production Technologies vis-àvis Climate Change" 10-12 October, 2012, CCS HAU, Hisar :157-162.
  • Vastrad, A.S. (2003). Neonicotinoids current success and future outlook. Pestology., 27: 60-63.

Abstract Views: 347

PDF Views: 0




  • Evaluation of Newer Insecticides against Leaf Hopper on Bt Cotton

Abstract Views: 347  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. W. Nemade
Cotton Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
S. B. Deshmukh
Cotton Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
Jayashri D. Ughade
Zonal Agriculture Research Station, Yavatmal (M.S.), India

Abstract


Evaluation studies were carried out for management of leaf hoppers on Bt cotton during 2012-13 at three different locations. The pooled results revealed that minimum population of leaf hoppers was recorded in the treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) and it was at par with treatment diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) and imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%). Next best treatment was buprofezin 25 SC (0.05%). Significantly highest seed cotton yield of 19.43 q/ha was harvested in application of treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) followed by diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) and imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) with 18.66 and 18.19 quintal per hectar, respectively. Highest monetary return Rs. 33,409 per ha was also observed in the treatment fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) (Rs. 30113 per ha) and diafenthiuron 50 WP (0.08%) (Rs. 28340 per ha) whereas in terms of higher incremental cost benefit ratio, imidacloprid 30.5 SL (0.005%) was found superior which recorded 1: 13.3 followed by fipronil 5 SC (0.075%) (1: 8.9).

Keywords


Leaf Hopper, Bt Cotton, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, Diafenthiuron.

References