International Journal of Plant Protection

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Bioefficacy of Neonicotinoid Insecticide as Seed Treatment against Early Sucking Pests of Soybean Crop


Affiliations
1 Dryland Horticulture Research and Training Centre, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Garhakota, Sagar (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A field experiment was conducted at JNKVV, DHRTC farm during 2014 and 2015 to evaluate the effectiveness of imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam, used as seed treatment against the sucking pests of soybean crop. In this experiment numbers of sucking pests were counted at seven days interval starting from 20 days of sowing till five weeks after first observation. The number of jassids and white flies were counted from top three and two middle leaves of randomly selected 5 plants in each plot. The whitefly population was comparatively higher than that of jassids. The overall effect of insecticidal treatments at all the six intervals on sucking pest population revealed that all the treatments were found effective in comparison to untreated check. The treatment of Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 1.50 g. a.i./kg seed followed by Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 0.75 g. a.i. /kg seed was found most effective against the early sucking pests on soybean. The treatment of Thiamethoxom 70 % WS @ 2g/kg seed was least effective against the sucking pests. All the insecticidal treatments increased the yield of soybean seed significantly over the control. The highest seed yield was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 600 FS @ 1.50 g. a.i./kg seed.

Keywords

Bioefficacy, Neonicotinoid, Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam, Sucking Pests, Seed Treatment, Soybean.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abbas, K.K. (1999). Studies on impact of insect pests at different crop stages of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad (A.P.) INDIA.

  • Aioub, A.A.A., Raslan, S.A.A., Gomaa, E.A., Desuky, W.M. and Zaki, A.A. (2002). Management of sap sucking insect populations on cotton plants by imidacloprid application and NPK fertilization. Zagazig J. Agric. Res., 29 (1): 269–289.

  • Anonymous (1997). Annual progress report of AICRP on oilseeds (sunflower), Directorate of Oilseeds Research, ICAR. Hyderabad, India, pp. 167.

  • Anonymous (2012). Director’s report and summary tables of experiments of AICRP on soybean, NRCS, Indore

  • Anonymous ( 2015). Director‘s report and summary tables of experiments 2014-15, All India Coordinated Research Project on Soybean, ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore, India, pp 329.

  • Bhosle, B.B., Agale, D.A. and Kadam, D.R. (2009). Bioefficacy of different insecticides against Thrips in Bt cotton. Pestology, 33 (9): 26-28.

  • Dandale, H.G., Thakare, A.Y., Tikar, S.N., Rao, N.G.V. and Nimbalkar, S.A. (2001). Effect of seed treatment on sucking pests of Cotton and yield of seed cotton. Pestology, 25(3): 20-23.

  • Dey, P.K., Jana, S.K., Chakraborty, G. and Somchoudhury, A.K. (2005). Evaluation of Imidacloprid (70 WS and 20 SL) against sucking pest complex of okra, Abelmoschus esculentus. J. Entomological Res., 29(3): 215-218.

  • Dhandapani, N., Dhivahar, P. and Palanisamy, S. (2002). Evaluation of new molecules, clothianidin (Poncho 600 FS) and imidacloprid (Gaucho 600 FS) as seed treatment against sucking pests of cotton. p. 127–130. In: “Resources management in plant protection during twenty first century” (B.S. Babu, K.S. Varaprasad, K. Anitha, Ed.). 2. Plant Prot. As. India, Hyderabad (A.P.) INDIA.

  • El-Dewy, M.H.E. (2006). Toxicological studies on some pests attacking cotton. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Kafr El-Sheikh Univ., Egypt, 101 pp.

  • El-Naggar, J.B. (2006). Population density of certain early cotton season insects and associated predators influenced by seed treatments. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 13 (11): 7423–7434.

  • Forsberg, G., Kristensen, L., Eibel, P., Titone, P. and Haiti, W. (2003). Sensitivity of cereal seeds to short duration treatment with hot, humid air. J. Plant Disease & Protec., 110 (1): 1-16.

  • Kannan, M., Uthamasamy, S. and Mohan, S. (2004). Impact of insecticides on sucking pests and natural enemy complex of transgenic cotton. Curr. Sci., 86 (5) : 726-729.

  • Lind, R.J., Clough, M.S., Earley , F.G.P.,Wonnacott, S. and Reynolds, S.E. (1998a). Characterization of the relationship between binding sites for imidacloprid and other nicotinic ligands in insects. Pest Sci., 55: 1029-1031.

  • Lind, R.J., Clough, M.S., Reynolds, S.E. and Earley, F.G.P. (1998b). Imidacloprid lebels high- and low affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptor – like binding sites in the aphid Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 62 : 3-14

  • Magalhaes, L.C., Hunt, T.E. and Siegfried, B.D. (2009). Efficacy of neonicotinoid seed treatments to reduce soybean aphid populations under field and controlled conditions in Nebraska. J. Econ. Entomol., 102: 187-195.

  • Mohapatra, L.N. and Sahu, B.B. (2005).Management of early season sucking pests of cotton through seed dressing insecticides. Pestol., 29 (10) : 28-30.

  • Netam, H.K., Gupta, R. and Soni, S. (2013). Bioefficacy of insecticides as seed treatment against early sucking pest of soybean crop. Int. J. Sci. Res., 2 (1) : 688-690.

  • Patil, S.B., Udikeri, S.S., Renuka, B.H., Guruprasad, G.S., Shaila, H.M. and Abilasha, C. (2008) New seed dresser thaimethoxam 500 FS – No compromise in efficacy against sucking pests: An experimental evidence from cotton. Pestology, 32: 13- 16.

  • Rahman, M.M.E., Ali, M.E., Ali, M.S., Rahman, M.M. and Islam, M.N. (2008). Hot water thermal treatment for controlling seed-borne mycoflora of maize. Internat. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 3(5): 5-9.

  • Satpute, N.S., Katole, S.R., Nimbalkar, S.A., Sarnaik, D.N and Satpute, U.S. (2001). Efficacy of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam as seed treatment against cotton jassid, Amrasca devastans distant. J. Appl. Zoological Res.,12 (1): 88-90.

  • Sinha, S.R. and Sharma, R.K. (2007). Efficacy of neonicotinoids against okra insect pests. Pesticide Res. J., 19 (1) : 42-44.

  • Taylor, A.G., Eckenrode, C.J. and Straub, R.W. (2001). Seed coating technologies and treatments for onions: challenges and progress. Hort. Sci., 36: 199- 205.

  • Vadodaria, M.P., Patel, V.G., Patel, C.J., Patel, R.B. and Maisuria, I. M. (2001). Thiamethoxam (Cruiser) 70 WS: A new seed dresser against sucking pests of cotton. Pestology, 25 (9): 13-19.


Abstract Views: 217

PDF Views: 0




  • Bioefficacy of Neonicotinoid Insecticide as Seed Treatment against Early Sucking Pests of Soybean Crop

Abstract Views: 217  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. K. Mishra
Dryland Horticulture Research and Training Centre, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Garhakota, Sagar (M.P.), India
Vikas Gupta
Dryland Horticulture Research and Training Centre, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Garhakota, Sagar (M.P.), India
R. K. Saraf
Dryland Horticulture Research and Training Centre, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Garhakota, Sagar (M.P.), India

Abstract


A field experiment was conducted at JNKVV, DHRTC farm during 2014 and 2015 to evaluate the effectiveness of imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam, used as seed treatment against the sucking pests of soybean crop. In this experiment numbers of sucking pests were counted at seven days interval starting from 20 days of sowing till five weeks after first observation. The number of jassids and white flies were counted from top three and two middle leaves of randomly selected 5 plants in each plot. The whitefly population was comparatively higher than that of jassids. The overall effect of insecticidal treatments at all the six intervals on sucking pest population revealed that all the treatments were found effective in comparison to untreated check. The treatment of Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 1.50 g. a.i./kg seed followed by Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 0.75 g. a.i. /kg seed was found most effective against the early sucking pests on soybean. The treatment of Thiamethoxom 70 % WS @ 2g/kg seed was least effective against the sucking pests. All the insecticidal treatments increased the yield of soybean seed significantly over the control. The highest seed yield was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 600 FS @ 1.50 g. a.i./kg seed.

Keywords


Bioefficacy, Neonicotinoid, Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam, Sucking Pests, Seed Treatment, Soybean.

References