International Journal of Forestry and Crop Improvement

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Identification of Mechanization Gaps for Different Farm Operations for Fodder and Crop Cultivation in Pusa (Bihar) Region


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, Pusa (Bihar), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study deals the status of mechanization gaps for different farm operations for sustainable farming in Pusa region. Cattle farms based on grassland are dynamic system and it's difficult to manage, mainly because of their compassion to uncontrollable environmental factors. There are so many challenging issues regarding management strategies for efficient use of inputs. To meet the growing demand of population and productivity of land, agriculture mechanization is one of the important promising approaches. The outcome obtained from the survey conducted in a cattle farm of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur) Bihar shows approx 0.87 hp/ha utilization of farm power in terms of available machinery for farm operations which was established less than reported a value of power utilization e.g. 1.5 hp/ha for successful farm operation through mechanization. Moreover, seeds loss can be reduced during sowing operation by using specific machine. Mechanization also facilitates interculturing activities and sowing operation too which intern produces a good quality fodder. Nutritious fodder is required to enhance the quality of milk. Mechanization is an essential step to maintain the health of cattle and its produce.

Keywords

Farm Mechanization, Status of Farm, Milk Quality, Mechanization Gape.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2013-14). AICRP on farm implement and machinery (FIM). Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Report.

  • Ashkvari, Y., Azimi, J. and Maleki, A. (2011). Using electronically systems to increase the performance of forage reapers. Australian J. Basic & Appl. Sci., 5(12): 1458-1459.

  • Balishter, Gupta, V.K. and Singh, R. (1991). Impact of mechanization on employment and farm productivity. Productivity, 32(3): 484-489.

  • Baogang, Y. (2006). Development of Agricultural Mechanization and Modern Agriculture [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1, 022.

  • Bardhan, P. K. (1973). Size, productivity, and returns to scale:An analysis of farm-level data in Indian agriculture. J. Political Econ., 81(6): 1370-1386.

  • Bassett, J. H. and Boyle Jr, R. E. (1992). U.S. Patent No. 5,129,282. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

  • Choudhury, B.U., Mohapatra, K.P., Das Anup Pratibha, T., Das Nongkhlaw, L., Abdul Fiyaz, R., Ngachan, S.V., Hazarika, S., Rajkhowa, D.J. and Munda, G.C. (2013). Spatial variability in distribution of organic carbon stocks in the soils of North East India. Curr. Sci., 104(5): 604-614.

  • Dhinwa, P.S., Pathan, S.K., Sastry, S.V.C., Rao, M., Majumder, K.L., Chotani, M.L. and Sinha, R.L.P. (1992). Land use change analysis of Bharatpur district using GIS. J. Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 20(4): 237-250.

  • FAO (2000). The energy and agriculture nexus, environment and natural resources. Working paper no; 4. ROME.

  • Ghosh, P.K., Saha, R., Gupta, J.J., Ramesh, T., Das, A., Lama, T.D., Munda, G.C., Bordoloi, J.S., Verma, M.R. and Ngachan, S.V. (2009). Long-term effect of pastures on soil quality in acid soil of North-East India. Aust. J. Soil Res., 47: 372-379.

  • Jones, R.I. (1983). A statistical approach to practical fodder banking. Proceedings of the Annual Congresses of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa, 18(1), 135-139.

  • Kulakarni, S.D. (2009). Mechanization of agriculture-Indian scenario. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering (CIAE), Bhopal, Madhay Pradesh, pp. 1-18.

  • Kumar, D., Noori, T. and Kumar, M. (2016). Studies on existing mechanization status for fodder and crop in Rajendra Agricultural University region, PUSA, Bihar, India. International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Agricultural and food engineering 27-30 December, 2016. Agricultural and food Engineering Department, IIT Kharagpur, e-Proceedings pp. 210-216.

  • Lal, R. (2009). The plough and agricultural sustainability. J. Sustainable Agric., 33(1): 66-84.

  • Moharpatra, R. (2016). Dynamics of agricultural mechanisation and rural labour Force. Asian J. Res. Soc. Sci. & Humanities, 6(1): 26-40. DOI No.-10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00004.6.

  • Olafadehan, O.A. and Adewumi, M.K. (2009). Productive and reproductive performance of strategically supplemented free grazing prepartum Bunaji cows in agropastoral farming system. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 41: 1275-1281.

  • Olafadehan, O.A. (2013). Feeding value of Pterocarpus erinaceus for growing goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 185: 1-8.

  • Peratoner, G., Gallmetzer, W., Klotz, C., Florian, C., Figl, U. and Pramsohler, M. (2012). Seed multiplication of Trifoliumalpinum: crop persistency and harvesting methods. Grasslanda European-resource?-Proceedings-of-the-24th-General-Meeting-of-the-European-Grassland-Federation, Lublin, Poland, 3 7 June 511-513.

  • Puckett, H.B. (1980). Mechanization of Livestock Production in the United States. BSAP Occasional Publication, 2: 191-204. doi: 10.1017/S0263967X00000380.

  • Reijntjes, C., Haverkort, B. and Waters-Bayer, A. (1992). Farming for the future: an introduction to low-external-input and sustainable agriculture. Macmillan Press Ltd.

  • Singh, Gajendra (2001). Relation between Mechanization and Agricultural Productivity in Various Parts of India. AMA., 32(2): 68-76.

  • World Bank (2008). The World Bank annual report 2008: year in review (English).

  • Saha, R., Chaudhary, R.S. and Somasundaram, J. (2012b). Soil health management under hill agroecosystem of North East India. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci., doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/696174.


Abstract Views: 191

PDF Views: 1




  • Identification of Mechanization Gaps for Different Farm Operations for Fodder and Crop Cultivation in Pusa (Bihar) Region

Abstract Views: 191  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Dheeraj Kumar
Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), India
Manoranjan Kumar
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, Pusa (Bihar), India

Abstract


The present study deals the status of mechanization gaps for different farm operations for sustainable farming in Pusa region. Cattle farms based on grassland are dynamic system and it's difficult to manage, mainly because of their compassion to uncontrollable environmental factors. There are so many challenging issues regarding management strategies for efficient use of inputs. To meet the growing demand of population and productivity of land, agriculture mechanization is one of the important promising approaches. The outcome obtained from the survey conducted in a cattle farm of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur) Bihar shows approx 0.87 hp/ha utilization of farm power in terms of available machinery for farm operations which was established less than reported a value of power utilization e.g. 1.5 hp/ha for successful farm operation through mechanization. Moreover, seeds loss can be reduced during sowing operation by using specific machine. Mechanization also facilitates interculturing activities and sowing operation too which intern produces a good quality fodder. Nutritious fodder is required to enhance the quality of milk. Mechanization is an essential step to maintain the health of cattle and its produce.

Keywords


Farm Mechanization, Status of Farm, Milk Quality, Mechanization Gape.

References