International Journal of Commerce & Business Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Decomposition Analysis of Income Difference between Furrow and Border Strip Method of Irrigation in Cultivation of Wheat in the Malaprabha Command Area of Karnataka


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad (Karnataka), India
3 Department of Agri-Business Management, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was conducted in the Malaprabha Command Area as many scientific irrigation methods were implemented by the RKVY project. The required data were collected from the 35 farmers each practicing border strip method of irrigation (scientific) and furrow method of irrigation (traditional) in the cultivation of wheat. The data were analysed using the output decomposition model developed by Bisaliah (1977). The study revealed that the adopters of scientific irrigation technology produced 24.87 per cent higher income from border strip method of irrigation than furrow irrigation. The increase in the income was further decomposed into different sources of change such as adoption of scientific irrigation technology and changed input levels. The scientific irrigation technology alone could contribute 23.65 per cent increase in income, while the contribution of change in input levels was found to be positive (1.22 %). Amongst the various inputs, seed (-0.18 %), fertiliser (-0.53 %) and cost of irrigation (-2.34 %) contributed negatively where as human labour (1.41 %), bullock and machine labour (2.75 %) and FYM (0.11) contributed positively to the income.

Keywords

Decomposition Analysis, Border Strip Method of Irrigation, Furrow Irrigation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bisaliah, S. (1977). Decomposition analysis of output change under new production technology in wheat farming - some implications to returns on investment. Indian J. agric Econ., 32(3) : 193-201.

  • Gaddi, G.M., Mundinamani, S.M. and Patil, S.A. (2002) Yield gaps, constraints and potential in wheat production in North Karnataka - An econometric analysis. Indian J. agric. Econ., 57(4) : 722-734.

  • Kumar, Vinod (2001). Decomposition analysis of output change under new production technology in dairy farming. Indian J. Animal Sci., 71(10) : 966-969.

  • Mohan, H.P. (2009). Impact of IPM technology on wheat and paddy production in Haveri district- an economic analysis. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).


Abstract Views: 309

PDF Views: 2




  • Decomposition Analysis of Income Difference between Furrow and Border Strip Method of Irrigation in Cultivation of Wheat in the Malaprabha Command Area of Karnataka

Abstract Views: 309  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Shreeshail Rudrapur
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
B. L. Patil
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad (Karnataka), India
R. A. Yeledhalli
Department of Agri-Business Management, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad (Karnataka), India

Abstract


The present study was conducted in the Malaprabha Command Area as many scientific irrigation methods were implemented by the RKVY project. The required data were collected from the 35 farmers each practicing border strip method of irrigation (scientific) and furrow method of irrigation (traditional) in the cultivation of wheat. The data were analysed using the output decomposition model developed by Bisaliah (1977). The study revealed that the adopters of scientific irrigation technology produced 24.87 per cent higher income from border strip method of irrigation than furrow irrigation. The increase in the income was further decomposed into different sources of change such as adoption of scientific irrigation technology and changed input levels. The scientific irrigation technology alone could contribute 23.65 per cent increase in income, while the contribution of change in input levels was found to be positive (1.22 %). Amongst the various inputs, seed (-0.18 %), fertiliser (-0.53 %) and cost of irrigation (-2.34 %) contributed negatively where as human labour (1.41 %), bullock and machine labour (2.75 %) and FYM (0.11) contributed positively to the income.

Keywords


Decomposition Analysis, Border Strip Method of Irrigation, Furrow Irrigation.

References