International Journal of Commerce & Business Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Resource Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency in Chickpea Production on Dryland Farm


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Resource productivity and resource use efficiency of chickpea production have been computed using primary data collected from 48 dryland farm spread over two tehsils in Nanded district of Maharashtra. The study revealed that area under chickpea, human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, seed, nitrogen, phosphorus and potash and plant protection as resources. Cobb Douglas production function was fitted to the data. The results revealed that partial regression co-efficient of human labour was 0.455 followed by that area under chickpea was (0.173) positive at 1 per cent level and partial regression co-efficient of nitrogen and machine labour were positive but non-significant. Marginal product of area under chickpea was 2.286 quintals followed by that of bullock labour (0.187 q), plant protection (0.187q) and human labour (0.114q). MVP to price ratio with respect to potash was 9.69 followed by seed (6.87), human labour (2.60) and area under chickpea (1.91). Optimum use of area under chickpea was found to be 0.78 hectare and optimum use of human labour was 56.25 mandays.

Keywords

Chickpea, Resource Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, Optimum Resource.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Asmatoddin, M J.N., Ghulghule, S.V., Jawale and Tawale, J.B. (2009). Resource productivity and resource use efficiency in pulses production on medium farm in Marathwada. Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 5(2): 359-362.

  • Asmatoddin, M.S.V. Jawale and Perke, D.S. (2009). Economic anaylsis of pulses production on medium farm in Marathwada.Agric. Update,4 (3&4) : 262-265.

  • Bahadur, T., Parhasarthy, P.B. and Reddy, K.S. (1988). Resources use efficiency in dry farming. Agric. Situ. India, 63 (1): 29-31.

  • Bhendi, M.J. and Kalirajan, K. P. (2007). Technical efficiency of major food and cash crops in Karnataka (India). Indian J. Agric. Econ., 62(2) : 176-192.

  • Chamak, J.S., Singh, A.J. and Sidhu, D.S. (1978). Resource use efficiency in Punjab. Agric. Situ. India, 34 (4): 211216.

  • Kennedy, G.P., Raghuram, S.P.,Naidu, M.R. and Shreenivasula, R. (1990). Economics analysis of major pulses in Gujrat districts of Andhra Pradesh. Agric. Situ. India, 65 (2) : 173-182.

  • Negi, R.S., Singh, L.R. and Moorti, T.V. (1972). Resources allocation efficiency on small farms in Nainetal Tarai. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 27(4): 167.


Abstract Views: 224

PDF Views: 0




  • Resource Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency in Chickpea Production on Dryland Farm

Abstract Views: 224  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. U. Kauthekar
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), India
B. R. Pawar
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), India
R. V. Chavan
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), India

Abstract


Resource productivity and resource use efficiency of chickpea production have been computed using primary data collected from 48 dryland farm spread over two tehsils in Nanded district of Maharashtra. The study revealed that area under chickpea, human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, seed, nitrogen, phosphorus and potash and plant protection as resources. Cobb Douglas production function was fitted to the data. The results revealed that partial regression co-efficient of human labour was 0.455 followed by that area under chickpea was (0.173) positive at 1 per cent level and partial regression co-efficient of nitrogen and machine labour were positive but non-significant. Marginal product of area under chickpea was 2.286 quintals followed by that of bullock labour (0.187 q), plant protection (0.187q) and human labour (0.114q). MVP to price ratio with respect to potash was 9.69 followed by seed (6.87), human labour (2.60) and area under chickpea (1.91). Optimum use of area under chickpea was found to be 0.78 hectare and optimum use of human labour was 56.25 mandays.

Keywords


Chickpea, Resource Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, Optimum Resource.

References