International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Potential of Jute Crop for Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emission in the Changing Climatic Scenario


Affiliations
1 Crop Production Division, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres, Barrackpore, Kolkata (W.B.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Global warming is steadily increasing and impacting on highly vulnerable developing countries. Agriculture which is an essential sector for most of developing countries contributing to climate change with greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and suffering from the effects of climate change. The challenge of feeding the population and reducing agricultural GHG emissions requires the successful transfer of climate-friendly agricultural and land use practices to farmers serving adaptation and mitigation needs. Jute crop have the potential to absorb and fix carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, save for the carbon released back through the application of agro-chemical inputs and use of fossil fuels in the management of jute production systems. The paper reviews the relationship between carbon sequestration, jute crop management systems and the effects on greenhouse gases. This may help in identifying the point to improve environmental efficiency and accessing opportunities for carbon trading, contribute to the development of sustainable technologies to manage GHG emissions and global warming.

Keywords

Jute, Carbon Sequestration, Greenhouse Gas, GHG Mitigation, Climate.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Behera, U., Sharma, A. and Pandey, H. (2007). Sustaining productivity of wheat-soybean cropping system through integrated nutrient management practices on the Vertisols of central India. Plant Soil, 297:185-199.

  • Bockel, L., Smith, G., Marjory, B., Martial, B., Marianne, T., Henry, M. and Giacomo, B. (2011). Mainstreaming carbon balance appraisal of agriculture projects and policies: Tool for measuring carbon-balance in ex-ante project-programme impact appraisal, a policy brief, FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • Brandao, M., Levasseur, A., Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Weidema, B.P., Cowie, A.L., Jorgensen, S.V., Hauschild, M.Z., Pennington, D.W. and Chomkhamsri, K. (2013).Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting. Internat. J. Life Cycle Assessm.,18: 230-240.

  • Carbon, Trust (2007). Carbon footprint measurement methodology, Version 1.1. The Carbon Trust, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.

  • Cole, C.V., Duxbury, J., Freney, J., Heinemeyer, O., Minami, K., Mosier, A., Paustian, K., Rosenburg, N., Sampson, N., Sauerbeck, D. and Zhao, Q. (1997). Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture. Nutr. Cycl. & Agroecosystem, 49 : 221-228.

  • CRIJAF (2013). Vision 2050. ICAR-Central Research Institute for jute and fibre crops, Kolkata (W.B.) INDIA.

  • Denman, K.L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P.M., Dickinson, R.E., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D., Lohmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P.L., Wofsy, S.C. and Zhang, X. (2007). Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In : Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Chen Z, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L., Millereds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, U.S.A.

  • Dubey, A. and Lal, R. (2009).Carbon footprint and sustainability of agricultural production systems in Punjab, India and Ohio, USA. J. Crop Improv., 23: 332-350.

  • Gan, Y., Liang, B.C., Hamel, C., Cutforth, H. and Wang, H. (2011). Strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of field crops for semiarid areas- A review. Agron. Sustain. Develop., 31 : 643-656.

  • Gan, Y.T., Liang, B.C., May, W., Malhi, S.S., Niu, J. and Wang, X. (2012). Carbon footprint of spring barley in relation to preceding oilseeds and N fertilization. Internat. J. Life Cycle Assessm., 17 : 635-645.

  • Hati, K.K., Swarup, A. and Dwivedi, A.K.(2007). Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a Vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agric. Ecosyst. & Environ., 119 : 127-134.

  • IJSG (2013). Carbon credit of jute and sustainable environment, International jute study group. Jute Matter, 1 : 1-2.

  • INCCA (2010). India: Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2007. Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment and Ministry of Environment & Forests, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • IPCC (2001). Intergovernmental panel on climate change: The Scientific Basis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

  • IPCC (2005). IPCC Good practice for LULUCF Sector. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. University of Cambridge press, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.

  • IPCC (2007). Climate Change: The Physical Basis, contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Jenny, H. and Raychaudhuri, S.P. (1960). Effect of climate and cultivation on nitrogen and organic matter resources in Indian soils. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Johnson, J.M., Franzleubbers, A.J., Weyers, S.L. and Reicosky (2007). Agriculture opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Environ. Pollut.,150: 107-124.

  • Juwarkar, A.A., Varghese, A.O., Singh, S.K., Aher, V.V. and Thawale, P.R. (2011). Carbon sequestration potential in aboveground biomass of natural reserve forest of central India. Internat. J. Agric. Res. & Rev.,1:80-86.

  • Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Follett, R.F. and Cole, C.V. (1998).The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.

  • Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304:1623-1627.

  • Lal, R. (2004a). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ. Internat., 30 : 981-990.

  • Losi, C. J., Siccama, T.G., Condit, R. and Morales, J.E. (2003). Analysis of alternative methods for estimating carbon stock in young tropical plantations. Forest Ecol. & Mgmt., 184: 355-368.

  • Mandal, B., Majumdar, B., Bandyopadhyay, P.K., Hazra, G.C., Gangopadhyay, A., Samantaray, R.N., Mishra, A.K., Chaudhury, J., Saha, M.N. and Kundu, S. (2007).The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India. Global Change Biol.,13: 357-369.

  • Manna, M.C., Swarup, A. and Wajari, R.H. (2005).Long-term effect of fertilizer and manure application on soil organic carbon storage, soil quality and yield sustainability under sub-humid and semi-arid tropical India. Field Crops Res., 93 : 264-280.

  • Marble, S.C., Prior, S.A., Runion, G.B., Torbert, H.A., Gillian, C.H. and Fain B.G. (2011). The importance of determining carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas mitigation potential in ornamental horticulture. Hort. Sci.,46:240-244.

  • Namdari, M., Kangarshahi, A. A. and Amiri, A.N. (2011). Modelling energy flow for orange production in Iran. Internat. J. Plant Anim.& Environ. Sci., 1: 131-139.

  • Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H. and Karadeniz, F. (2003). Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. Energy Convers. & Mgmt., 45:1821-1830.

  • Palit, P. (1993). Radiation and carbon use efficiency in field grown jute in relation to potential primary production. Photosynthetica, 28 : 369-375.

  • Pathak, H., Byjesh, K., Chakrabarti, B. and Aggarwal, P.K. (2011). Potential and cost of carbon sequestration in Indian agriculture: Estimates from long-term field experiments. Field Crops Res., 120: 102-111.

  • Pathak, H., Upadhay, R.C., Murlidhar, M., Bhattacharya, P. and Venkateswarlu, B.(2013). Measurement of greenhouse gas emission from crop, livestock and aquaculture. NICRA Manual Series-2/2013, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, NEW DELHI, INDIA..

  • Plassmann, K., Norton, A., Attarzadeh, N., Jensen, P.M., Brenton, P. and Jones-Edwards, G. (2010). Methodological complexities of carbon foot printing: a sensitivity analysis of key variables in a developing country context. Environ. Sci. & Policy, 13 : 393-404.

  • Rajagopal, K. and Sanyal, T. (2012). Sustainable infrastructure development including limited life geosynthetics. Proceedings of Geosynthetics Asia, Bangkok.

  • Ramachandra, T.V. and Shwetmala (2012). Decentralised carbon footprint analysis for opting climate change mitigation strategies in India. Renewable & Sustain. Energy Rev., 16 : 5820-5833.

  • Seip, H.M. (2011). Carbon footprints: relative drop for farming emissions. Nature, 480: 321.

  • Stern, N. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Timothy, P., Walker, S. and Brown, S. (2005). Land use, land-use change and forestry projects, Winrock International.

  • Velayutham, M., Pal, D.K. and Bhattacharyya, T. (2000). Organic carbon stock in soils of India. In: Global climatic change and tropical ecosystems, (R. Lal, J.M. Kimble and B.A. Stewart, eds.),Advances in Soil Science, pp71-95, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

  • West, O.T. and Marland, G. (2002). A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. & Environ., 91: 217-232.

  • Wood, S. and Cowie, A. (2004). A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertilizer production.Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting, IEA: Bio-energy Task 38.

  • Yadav, R.L., Dwivedi, B.S., Prasad, K., Tomar, O.K., Shurpali, N.J. and Pandey, P.S. (2000). Yield trends and changes in soil organic-C and available NPK in a long-term rice-wheat system under integrated use of manures and fertilisers. Field Crops Res., 68 : 219-246.


Abstract Views: 185

PDF Views: 0




  • The Potential of Jute Crop for Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emission in the Changing Climatic Scenario

Abstract Views: 185  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

A. K. Singh
Crop Production Division, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres, Barrackpore, Kolkata (W.B.), India

Abstract


Global warming is steadily increasing and impacting on highly vulnerable developing countries. Agriculture which is an essential sector for most of developing countries contributing to climate change with greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and suffering from the effects of climate change. The challenge of feeding the population and reducing agricultural GHG emissions requires the successful transfer of climate-friendly agricultural and land use practices to farmers serving adaptation and mitigation needs. Jute crop have the potential to absorb and fix carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, save for the carbon released back through the application of agro-chemical inputs and use of fossil fuels in the management of jute production systems. The paper reviews the relationship between carbon sequestration, jute crop management systems and the effects on greenhouse gases. This may help in identifying the point to improve environmental efficiency and accessing opportunities for carbon trading, contribute to the development of sustainable technologies to manage GHG emissions and global warming.

Keywords


Jute, Carbon Sequestration, Greenhouse Gas, GHG Mitigation, Climate.

References