International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Performance of Mini Tractor Drawn Tillage Implements for Seed Bed Preparation under Sandy Loam Conditions of Middle Gujarat


Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University, GODHRA (GUJARAT), India
2 Department of Farm Machinery Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University, GODHRA (GUJARAT), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Tillage is an operation performed to obtain a desirable soil structure for a seedbed or ischolar_mainbed. Reducing tillage operations is a way of saving money and labour, but there are other factors which need to be considered before adopting a particular technique. Field tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of three types of mini tractor drawn tillage implements for seedbed preparation at College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University Godhra, district: Panchmahal. The mini tractor, Mahindra-Yuvraj (15 hp) and the matching tillage impalements i.e. cultivator, M.B. plough and rotavator were used for seedbed preparation by selecting four different treatments, namely; T1: Cross cultivation by cultivator, T2: M.B.Plough + cultivator, T3: 2 x rotavator and T4:1 x rotavator using a Randomized Block Design with five replications. The parameters evaluated were travel reduction (wheel slippage), draft, speed of operation, drawbar power, soil volume disturbed, fuel consumption, field efficiency and soil pulverization. Results indicated that single pass of rotavator (T4) was economical as well as it performed satisfactory for seed bed preparation in comparison to the other treatments with respect to the parameters evaluated. The hourly cost required for tillage operation under T1: Cross cultivation by cultivator, T2: M.B. plough + cultivator, T3: 2 x rotavator and T4: 1 x rotavator was rupees 311.25, 327.91, 410.54 and 280.17, respectively. The operational cost of single pass of rotavator (T4) was observed lowest. So, amongst all implements used for seed bed preparation, the mini tractor drawn rotavator performed very well from the point of efficiency, soil pulverization and total hourly cost.

Keywords

Seed Bed Preparation, Fuel Consumption, Draft, Wheel Slip, Soil Volume Disturbed, Field Efficiency, Soil Pulverization.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahaneku, I.E.,Oyelade, O.A. and Faleye,T. (2011).Comparative field evaluation of three models of a tractor, J. Appl. Sci. Engg. & Technol., 7 (1):42–49.

  • Ahmed, M.H. and Haffar, I. (1993). Comparison of five tillage systems for cotton production in Rahad Scheme, Sudan. Agric. Mechaniz. Asia, Africa & Latin America, 24 (2):17-29.

  • Al-Janobi, A.A. and Al-Suhaibani, S.A. (1998). Draft of primary tillage implements in sandy loam soil. Appl. Engg. Agric., 14 (4):343–348.

  • Anonymous (2009). Test reports on rotavator tested during 2006-2009. Farm Machinery Testing Centre, Department of Farm Machinery & Power Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (PUNJAB) INDIA.

  • Arvidsson, J., Keller,T. and Gustafsson, K. (2004). Specific draft for moldboard plow, chisel plow and disk harrow at different water contents. Soil & Tillage Res., 79:221-231.

  • Boydafl, M.G. (2007). Effect of different soil tillage implements and working speeds on soil surface roughness.Akdeniz Univ.Agr. Fac. J., 20:111-117.

  • Bukhari, S., Bhutto, M. A., Baloch, J. M., Bhutto, A. B. and Mirani, A.N. (1988). Performance of selected tillage implements. Agric. Mechaniz. Asia, Africa & Latin America, 19 (4):9–14.

  • Finner, M.F. and Straub, R.J. (1985). Farm Machinery Fundamentals. American Pub. Co., Madison, WI, USA., pp: 143.

  • Gill, W. R. and Vanden, Berg G. E.(1968). Soil dynamics in tillage and traction. Agricultural handbook No.316. Washington, D.C., US GPO.

  • Guruswami, T. (1986). Cultivator an efficient implement in dry land agriculture. Agril. Engg.Today, 10 (4):15-17.

  • Hammad, E. A. and Dawelbeit, M. I. (2001). Effect of tillage and field condition on soil physical properties, cane and sugar yields in vertisols of Kenana Sugar Estate, Sudan. Soil & Tillage Res., 62 (3-4):101–109.

  • Iqbal, M., Sabir, M.S., Younis, M.D. and Azhar, A.A. (1994). Draught requirements of selected tillage implements. AMA, 25 (1):13-15.

  • Kathirvel, K., Manian, R. and Balasubramanian, M. (2001). Tractive performance of power tiller tyres. Agric. Mechaniz. Asia, African & Latin America, 32 (2):32-36.

  • Kepner, R.A., Bainer, R. and Barger, E.L. (1987).Principles of Farm Machinery.CBS Publishers & Distributors, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Mahal, J.S., Manes, G.S., Prakash, A., Singh, Manpreet and Dixit, Anoop (2012). Study on blade characteristics of commercially available rotavators in Punjab. Agric. Engg. Today, 36 (3):8-11.

  • Mehta, M.L., Vermam, S.R., Misra, S.K. and Sharma, V.K. (1995). National agricultural information centre.Test. & Evaluat. Agric. Machin. chap, 4:57-68 .

  • Mishra, T.N., Singh, B., Singh, K.N., Singh, G.S. and Ghosh, Atish (1989). Effect of machinery management on energy requirements and yield for wheat after paddy harvesting. J. Agric. Engg. ISAE, 26:34-37.

  • Naderloo, L., Alimadani, R., Akram,A., Javadikia, P. and Khanghah, H.Z. (2009). Tillage depth and forward speed effects on draft of three primary tillage implements in clay loam soil. J. Food Agric. Environ., 7: 382-385.

  • Narang, Suresh and Tiwari, P.S. (2004). Field performance evaluation of light weight power tillers. Paper presented during 38th Annual Convention of ISAE, held at Dr. B.S. Sawant Kokan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.) INDIA.

  • Patil, S.B., Salunkhe, R.C., Jadhav, S.K. and Patil, S.S. (2009). Evaluation for cost effective combination of different seed bed preparation implements with large size tractors. Internat.J. Agric. Engg., 2 (2):212-215.

  • Pullman Plant Materials Center (2005). Technical Note 6 — Seedbed Preparation.USDA-NRCS-Pullman Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Wa., 12:34-54.

  • Raney,W.A. and Zingg, A.W. (1957). Principles of Tillage. The Yearbook of Agriculture, USDA, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

  • RNAM (1995). Regional Network for Agricultural Machinery Test codes and Procedures for Farm Machinery. Technical Series No. 12. General Guidelines in the use of Test Codes.

  • Sahay, Jagdiswar (2010). Farm power, farm machinery, farm processing, farm electricity, Elements Agric. Engg. part –ii, chap : 13:247–254.

  • Singh, C. P. and Panesar, B. S. (1991). Optimum combination of tillage tool for seed bed preparation of wheat after paddy harvest.AMA, 22 (2):18-22.

  • Singh, K.P. (1999). Comparative performance of powered harrow plough with rotavator and disc harrow clod crusher combination. M. Tech. Thesis, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U. P. India.111 p.

  • Singh, K.P., Singh, Bachchan and Singh, T.P. (2002). Performance evaluation of powered harrow plough in comparison to other tillage systems in Silty-clay loam soil, J. Agric. Engg., 39 (1):40-48 .

  • Singh, T.P. (1998). Design, development and comparative performance evaluation of vertical disc plough in powered and unpowered models. Ph.D. Thesis, G B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, pp. 300.

  • Taniguchi, T., Makanga, J.T., Ohtomo, K. and Kishimoto, T. (1999). Draught and soil manipulation by a moldboard plough under different forward speed and body attachments. Trans. ASAE, 42 (6):1517–1521.

  • Terry M. Conway. (2003). Proper seedbed preparation is key to a successful planting, USDA-NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service, Salina, Kansas.

  • Tiwari, V.K. (2010). Biannual Report of AICRP on Farm Implements and Machinery Agricultural and Food Engineering Department,Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (W.B.) INDIA.

  • Upadhyaya, S. K., Williams, T. H., Kemble, L. J. and Collins, N. E. (1984). Energy requirement for chiseling in coastal plain soils. Tran. ASAE, 27(6):1643-1649.

  • Upadhyaya, S., Lancas, K., Santos-Filho, A. and Raghuwanshi, N. (2001). One-pass tillage equipment outstrips conventional tillage method. California Agric., 55 (5):44-47.


Abstract Views: 332

PDF Views: 1




  • Comparative Performance of Mini Tractor Drawn Tillage Implements for Seed Bed Preparation under Sandy Loam Conditions of Middle Gujarat

Abstract Views: 332  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

K. L. Dabhi
Department of Farm Machinery Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University, GODHRA (GUJARAT), India
R. S. Godhani
Department of Farm Machinery Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University, GODHRA (GUJARAT), India
R. Swarnkar
Department of Farm Machinery Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University, GODHRA (GUJARAT), India

Abstract


Tillage is an operation performed to obtain a desirable soil structure for a seedbed or ischolar_mainbed. Reducing tillage operations is a way of saving money and labour, but there are other factors which need to be considered before adopting a particular technique. Field tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of three types of mini tractor drawn tillage implements for seedbed preparation at College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Anand Agricultural University Godhra, district: Panchmahal. The mini tractor, Mahindra-Yuvraj (15 hp) and the matching tillage impalements i.e. cultivator, M.B. plough and rotavator were used for seedbed preparation by selecting four different treatments, namely; T1: Cross cultivation by cultivator, T2: M.B.Plough + cultivator, T3: 2 x rotavator and T4:1 x rotavator using a Randomized Block Design with five replications. The parameters evaluated were travel reduction (wheel slippage), draft, speed of operation, drawbar power, soil volume disturbed, fuel consumption, field efficiency and soil pulverization. Results indicated that single pass of rotavator (T4) was economical as well as it performed satisfactory for seed bed preparation in comparison to the other treatments with respect to the parameters evaluated. The hourly cost required for tillage operation under T1: Cross cultivation by cultivator, T2: M.B. plough + cultivator, T3: 2 x rotavator and T4: 1 x rotavator was rupees 311.25, 327.91, 410.54 and 280.17, respectively. The operational cost of single pass of rotavator (T4) was observed lowest. So, amongst all implements used for seed bed preparation, the mini tractor drawn rotavator performed very well from the point of efficiency, soil pulverization and total hourly cost.

Keywords


Seed Bed Preparation, Fuel Consumption, Draft, Wheel Slip, Soil Volume Disturbed, Field Efficiency, Soil Pulverization.

References