International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Physical Properties of Waterlogged Vertisols under Subsurface Drainage System with Different Drain Spacings and Depths


Affiliations
1 NARP, Agricultural Research Station, Kasbe Digraj, Tal. Miraj, Sangli (M.S.), India
2 Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Dr. Annasaheb Shinde College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India
3 Agricultural Research Station, Sangli (M.S.), India
4 Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Dr. Annasaheb Shinde College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The field investigation entitled "Physical properties of waterlogged Vertisols under subsurface drainage system with different drain spacings and depths" was conducted on farmer's field at village Mouje Digraj which was located 3 km away from Agricultural Research Station, Kasbe Digraj, district Sangli (Maharashtra), India during Adsali sugarcane season (16-18 months crop duration) of 2012-13 to 2013-14. In order to fulfill the objective of the study, the bulk density, particle density, total porosity and basic infiltration rate of soil were determined at initial and 18 months after drainage with respect to twelve treatment combinations consisting of four drain spacings of (10, 20, 30 and 40 m) and three drain depths (0.75, 1.0 and 1.25 m). It was found that the subsurface drainage system with drain spacing of 10 m and drain depth of 1.25 m recorded highest per cent improvements in bulk density (20.99%), particle density (6.10%), total porosity (13.74%) and basic infiltration rate of soil (13.75%) following 18 months of drainage. However, these per cent improvements in physical properties of soil under different treatment combinations of drain spacings and drain depths were followed decreasing trends from the closer to wider spaced drains under fixed drain depth i.e. 10 m > 20 m > 30 m > 40 m and from deeper to shallower drain depth under fixed drain spacing i.e., 1.25 m > 1.0 m > 0.75 m. Further, the difference between maximum and minimum values of per cent improvement of these physical properties of soil among 12 different treatments combinations were not too large (3.05 to 8.41%) which was within the 10 per cent variation. Considering the economics of twelve different combinations of drain spacings and drain depths, the drain spacing of 40 m and drain depth of 1.25 m were found optimal for economically feasible production of sugarcane and optimum physical properties of waterlogged Vertisols of Maharashtra.

Keywords

Drain Spacings, Depths, Physical Properties, Subsurface Drainage System, Sugarcane, Waterlogged Vertisols.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bharambe, P.R., Shelke, D.K., Jadhav, G.S., Vaishnava, V.G. and Oza, S.R. (2001). Management of salt affected Vertisols with sub-surface drainage and crop residue incorporation under soybean-wheat cropping system. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49(1): 24-29.

  • Blake, G.R. (1965). Particle density. In methods of soil analysis, part I, Agronomy, number 9. C.A. Black, edited by American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisc. pp.371-373.

  • Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. (1996). The nature and properties of soils (11th Ed.). Prentice Hall, New York.

  • Carter, C.E. and Camp, C.R. (1994). Drain spacing effect on water table control and cane sugar yields. Trans. ASAE, 37(5): 1509-1513.

  • CSSRI (2007). Salinity Vision 2025. (Eds. Gurbachan Singh, P. C Sharma and M. J. Kaledhonkar), Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 116p.

  • Dastane, N.G. (1967). A practical manual for water use research. Navabharat Prakashan, Poona, India, p.5.

  • Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H. (1979). Yield response to water. FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper No. 33, Rome, Italy.

  • Glaz, B., Morris, D.R. and Daroub, S.H. (2004). Periodic flooding and water table effects on two sugarcane genotypes. Agron. J., 96 : 832-838.

  • Glaz, B. and Morris, D.R. (2010). Sugarcane response to water table depth and periodic flood. Agron. J., 102 : 372-380.

  • Jafari-Talukolaee, M., Ritzema, H., Darzi-Naftchalli, A. and Shahnazari, A. (2016). Subsurface drainage to enable the cultivation of winter crops in consolidated paddy fields in Northern Iran. Sustainability, 8(249); doi:10.3390/su8030249:1-19.

  • Jung, K.Y., Yun, E.S., Park, K.D., Lee, Y.H., Hwang, J.B., Park, C.Y. and Ramos, E.P. (2010). Effect of subsurface drainage for multiple land use in sloping paddy fields. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1-6 August, Brisbane, Australia: 33-36.

  • Mitsch, W.J., Day, J.W., Gilliam, J.W., Groffmun, P.M., Hey, D.L., Randal, G.W. and Wang, N. (2001). Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. Bio Sci., 51: 373-388.

  • Nangia, V., Gowda, P.H., Mulla, D.J. and Sands, G.R. (2009). Modeling impacts of tile drain spacing and depth on Nitrate-Nitrogen losses. Vadose Zone J., 9 : 61-72.

  • Nash, P., Nelson, K. and Motavalli, P. (2014). Reducing Nitrogen loss in subsurface tile drainage water with managed drainage and polymer-coated urea in a river bottom soil. J. Water Resour. & Protec., 6 : 988-997.

  • Nayak, A.K., Chinchmalatpure, A.R., Khandelwal, M.K., Rao, G.G. and Tyagi, N.K. (2003). Soil and water resources and management options for the Bara Tract under Sardar Sarovar Canal Command: A critical appraisal. Status Paper No. 1, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bharuch, Gujarat.

  • Omonode, R.A. (2006). Long-term subsurface drainage intensity effects on soil organic carbon, plant biomass production, and carbon balance. 18th World Congress of Soil Science, July 9-15, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

  • Panse, V.C. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical methods for Agric. Workers. II. Enlarged Edn. ICAR, New Delhi.

  • Parr, J.R. and Bertrand, A.R. (1960). Water infiltration into soils. Adv. Agro., 12 : 311-363.

  • Postel, S.L. (1999). “Pillar of Sand: Can the irrigation miracle last?” W.W. Norton, NEWYORK, U.S.A.

  • Pradeep, H.M., Hebsur, N.S., Gali, S.K. and Malligawad, L.H. (2005). Effect of sub-surface drainage and amendments on growth and yield parameters of maize grown in Ghataprabha Command area. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 18 (4): 1102-1106.

  • Randall, G.W. and Mulla, D.J. (2001). Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices. J. Environ. Quality, 30 : 337-344.

  • Randall, G.W. (2004). Subsurface drain flow characteristics during a 15 year period in Minnesota. In. Proc. 8th Int. Drain. Symposium on Drain. VIII. 21-24 March, 2004. Sacramento, CA. ASAE.

  • Rathod, S.D., Gorantiwar, S.D., Dahiwalkar, S.D., Kamble, B.M., Patil, S.B. and Kathmale, D.K. (2011). Performance and economic feasibility of mole drainage in irrigated Vertisols. J. Soil Salinity & Water Quality, 3(1): 37-40.

  • Shakya, S.K. and Singh, J.P. (2010). New drainage technologies for salt-affected waterlogged areas of southwest Punjab, India. Curr. Sci., 99 (2) : 204-212.

  • Sharma, D.P., Singh, K. and Rao, K.V.G.K. (2000). Subsurface drainage for rehabilitation of waterlogged saline lands: Example of a soil in semiarid climate. Arid Soil Res. & Rehab., 14(4): 373-386.

  • Sharma, S. K. (2006). An E-Government Services Framework, Encyclopedia of Commerce, E-Government and Mobile Commerce, Mehdi Khosrow-Pour, Information Resources Management Association, Idea Group Reference, USA, pp. 373-378.

  • Thatte, C.D., Gupta, A.C. and Baweja (2009).Water resources development in India. Indian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, New Delhi, India, 173p.

  • Tiwari, P. and Goel, A. (2015). An overview of impact of subsurface drainage project studies on salinity management in developing countries. Appl. Water Sci., 4:1-12, DOI 10.1007/s13201-015-0329-4:1-12.

  • Zhou, Y.X., Zhen, S.C. and Zhai, Y.M. (2013). Entropy weight coefficient evaluation of subsurface drainage schemes based on the analysis of surface soil quality variations. J. Food, Agric. & Environ., 11 (3 & 4): 2368-2371.

  • Anonymous (2011). NRCS East National Technology Support Centre. Soil quality indicators: measures of soil functional state. Website accessed on 26/10/2016. http://soilquality.org/indicators/bulk_density.html.

  • FAO (2015). AQUASTAT website. Food and Agricultural Organizations of the United Nations. Website accessed on (24/12/2016). http://www.fao.org>water>cropinfo_sugarcane.


Abstract Views: 297

PDF Views: 0




  • Physical Properties of Waterlogged Vertisols under Subsurface Drainage System with Different Drain Spacings and Depths

Abstract Views: 297  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shrimant D. Rathod
NARP, Agricultural Research Station, Kasbe Digraj, Tal. Miraj, Sangli (M.S.), India
Sudhir D. Dahiwalkar
Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Dr. Annasaheb Shinde College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India
Sunil D. Gorantiwar
Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Dr. Annasaheb Shinde College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India
Bhimrao M. Kamble
Agricultural Research Station, Sangli (M.S.), India
Mukund G. Shinde
Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Dr. Annasaheb Shinde College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India

Abstract


The field investigation entitled "Physical properties of waterlogged Vertisols under subsurface drainage system with different drain spacings and depths" was conducted on farmer's field at village Mouje Digraj which was located 3 km away from Agricultural Research Station, Kasbe Digraj, district Sangli (Maharashtra), India during Adsali sugarcane season (16-18 months crop duration) of 2012-13 to 2013-14. In order to fulfill the objective of the study, the bulk density, particle density, total porosity and basic infiltration rate of soil were determined at initial and 18 months after drainage with respect to twelve treatment combinations consisting of four drain spacings of (10, 20, 30 and 40 m) and three drain depths (0.75, 1.0 and 1.25 m). It was found that the subsurface drainage system with drain spacing of 10 m and drain depth of 1.25 m recorded highest per cent improvements in bulk density (20.99%), particle density (6.10%), total porosity (13.74%) and basic infiltration rate of soil (13.75%) following 18 months of drainage. However, these per cent improvements in physical properties of soil under different treatment combinations of drain spacings and drain depths were followed decreasing trends from the closer to wider spaced drains under fixed drain depth i.e. 10 m > 20 m > 30 m > 40 m and from deeper to shallower drain depth under fixed drain spacing i.e., 1.25 m > 1.0 m > 0.75 m. Further, the difference between maximum and minimum values of per cent improvement of these physical properties of soil among 12 different treatments combinations were not too large (3.05 to 8.41%) which was within the 10 per cent variation. Considering the economics of twelve different combinations of drain spacings and drain depths, the drain spacing of 40 m and drain depth of 1.25 m were found optimal for economically feasible production of sugarcane and optimum physical properties of waterlogged Vertisols of Maharashtra.

Keywords


Drain Spacings, Depths, Physical Properties, Subsurface Drainage System, Sugarcane, Waterlogged Vertisols.

References