Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Force and Moments of T-Loop Using Software and Manual Methods


Affiliations
1 Department of Orthodontics, BBD Dental College, Lucknow, UP, India
2 BBDCODS, Lucknow, UP, India
3 Department of Orthodontics, KVG Dental College, Sullia, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India
4 Department of Orthodontics, BBDCODS, Lucknow, UP, India
5 Department of Orthodontics, Siddhpur Dental College & Hospital Dethali, Taluka, Patan, Gujarat, India
6 Lincoln University College Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia–47301, Malaysia
 

Background:T loops are most commonly used in space closure in Orthodontics hence the comparative force and moments were determined using both the methods Objectives: To determine and compare moments and forces generated by T loop spring using software and manual spring testing method.

Materials&Methods: Using the Loop software program (dHal, orthodontic loop simulator 1.7.0.0) force and moment and their ratios were calculated at various positions and for various activations for a standard design of T loop (.017 × .025 TMA) given by Kuhlberg&Burstone. The values were then compared with the corresponding values determined by manual spring tester method. Statistical analysis was done using Independent t-test and multivariate regression analysis.

Results: The results showed that the alpha/beta moment ratio was dependant only on the spring position and independent of spring activation. The force system produced by a spring placed 1 mm closer to alpha attachment with 3.5 mm activation provided for bodily movement of anterior segment with M/F ratio of 9.7. This was lesser than that determined by spring tester by 0.7 for same amount of activation and same position.

Conclusion: The comparison of the two methods for designing T loop showed statistically insignificant differences in M/F values. The loop software provided for good simulation of T loop design similar to manual method. The values determined by software and manual methods were highly correlated.


Keywords

T Loop, Loop Software, Moment, Orthodontic Loops, Segmented Arch Mechanics.
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 233

PDF Views: 122




  • Comparison of Force and Moments of T-Loop Using Software and Manual Methods

Abstract Views: 233  |  PDF Views: 122

Authors

A. Srivastava
Department of Orthodontics, BBD Dental College, Lucknow, UP, India
T. Tikku
BBDCODS, Lucknow, UP, India
M. K. Yethadka
Department of Orthodontics, KVG Dental College, Sullia, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India
R. Khanna
Department of Orthodontics, BBDCODS, Lucknow, UP, India
G. P. K. Sureshchand
Department of Orthodontics, Siddhpur Dental College & Hospital Dethali, Taluka, Patan, Gujarat, India
N. P. Rai
Lincoln University College Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia–47301, Malaysia

Abstract


Background:T loops are most commonly used in space closure in Orthodontics hence the comparative force and moments were determined using both the methods Objectives: To determine and compare moments and forces generated by T loop spring using software and manual spring testing method.

Materials&Methods: Using the Loop software program (dHal, orthodontic loop simulator 1.7.0.0) force and moment and their ratios were calculated at various positions and for various activations for a standard design of T loop (.017 × .025 TMA) given by Kuhlberg&Burstone. The values were then compared with the corresponding values determined by manual spring tester method. Statistical analysis was done using Independent t-test and multivariate regression analysis.

Results: The results showed that the alpha/beta moment ratio was dependant only on the spring position and independent of spring activation. The force system produced by a spring placed 1 mm closer to alpha attachment with 3.5 mm activation provided for bodily movement of anterior segment with M/F ratio of 9.7. This was lesser than that determined by spring tester by 0.7 for same amount of activation and same position.

Conclusion: The comparison of the two methods for designing T loop showed statistically insignificant differences in M/F values. The loop software provided for good simulation of T loop design similar to manual method. The values determined by software and manual methods were highly correlated.


Keywords


T Loop, Loop Software, Moment, Orthodontic Loops, Segmented Arch Mechanics.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds%2F2016%2F83544