International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Digital Imaging in Dentistry: An Overview


Affiliations
1 Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Muktsar, Punjab, India
2 Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
3 Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, KLE Society’s Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
4 Dept of Periodontology, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Muktsar, Punjab, India
 

Digital radiography has been available in dentistry for more than 25 years, but it has not replaced conventional film-based radiography completely. This could be because of the costs involved in replacing conventional radiographic equipment with a digital imaging system, or because implementing new technology in the dental practice requires a bit of courage. As use of digital radiography becomes more common, many dentists are wondering if and how they can replace conventional film-based imaging with a digital system. This article presents an overview of the different technologies used for digital imaging in dentistry with a broad overview of the benefits and limitations of digital imaging. The principles of direct and indirect digital imaging modalities, image processing and image analysis will be discussed.

Keywords

Digital Imaging, Digital Image Receptors, Image Processing, Image Analysis, Radiography.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital Radiography: An Overview. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2002;3:1-13.

  • Vander Stelt PF. Filmless imaging: The uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1379-1387.

  • Van der Stelt PF. Better Imaging: The Advantages of Digital Radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:7S-13S.

  • White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St Louis; Mosby: 2009.

  • Petrikowski CG. Introducing Digital Radiography in the Dental Office: An Overview. J Can Dent Assoc 2005; 71(9):651-651f.

  • Brennan J. An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry. Journal of Orthodontics 2002;29:66-69.

  • Mentes A, Gencoglu N. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93(1):88-91.

  • Vander Stelt PF, Geraets WG. Matching pairs of radiographs from different sensor systems for subtraction radiography. Paper presented at: 81st General Session of the International Association for Dental Research; June 28, 2003; Goteborg, Sweden.

  • Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Webber RL. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated highspeed systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55(3):313-318.

  • Bittar Cortez JA, Passeri LA, Boscolo FN, Haiter Neto F. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed indigitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(5):560-564.

  • Nicopoulou Karayianni K, Bragger U, Patrikiou A, Stassinakis A, Lang NP. Image processing for enhanced observer agreement in the evaluation of periapical bone changes. Int Endod J 2002;35(7):615622.

  • Howerton WB, Mora JMA. Advancements in Digital Imaging: What Is New and on the Horizon? JADA 2008;139(suppl 3):20S-24S.

  • Wenzel A. Digital Imaging for Dental Caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):319-38.

  • Nair MK, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Denton G. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998 May;85(5):608-12.

  • Wallace JA, Nair MK, Colaco MF, Kapa SF. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001 Jul;92(1):93-7.

  • Mohtavipour ST, Dalili Z, Azar NG. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. Imaging Sci Dent 2011;41:7-10.

  • Ravi V, Lipee P, Rao CVN, Lakshmikanthan L. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography – assessment of visibility of file length placed in the ischolar_main canal: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012;(Suppl 2):S285–S289.

  • Christensen GJ. Why switch to digital radiography? J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1437-1439.


Abstract Views: 260

PDF Views: 128




  • Digital Imaging in Dentistry: An Overview

Abstract Views: 260  |  PDF Views: 128

Authors

Preeti Dhir
Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Muktsar, Punjab, India
Chaya M. David
Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
G. Keerthi
Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, KLE Society’s Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Vivek Sharma
Dept of Periodontology, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Muktsar, Punjab, India
Varun Girdhar
Dept of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Muktsar, Punjab, India

Abstract


Digital radiography has been available in dentistry for more than 25 years, but it has not replaced conventional film-based radiography completely. This could be because of the costs involved in replacing conventional radiographic equipment with a digital imaging system, or because implementing new technology in the dental practice requires a bit of courage. As use of digital radiography becomes more common, many dentists are wondering if and how they can replace conventional film-based imaging with a digital system. This article presents an overview of the different technologies used for digital imaging in dentistry with a broad overview of the benefits and limitations of digital imaging. The principles of direct and indirect digital imaging modalities, image processing and image analysis will be discussed.

Keywords


Digital Imaging, Digital Image Receptors, Image Processing, Image Analysis, Radiography.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/ijmds%2F2014%2F81308