Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reciprocal Frustrations: The Relationship between New Zealand Employers, Temporary Staffing Agencies and Clerical Temporary Workers


Affiliations
1 Massey University, New Zealand
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research explored the triangular working relationship between employers, temporary staffing agencies, and clerical temporary workers. The study used a qualitative approach to investigate the interdependent relationship between these three groups within the context of the Auckland labour market. Findings are based on in-depth interviews with ten employer representatives, ten employment agency consultants, and twenty female agency clerical workers. Interviews with the employer representatives revealed that employers wanted agencies to facilitate swift and unproblematic access to a reliable, hardworking, and disposable workforce with similar skills and commitment to permanent employees. Agencies were often unable to meet these requirements, and employers, therefore, developed various strategies designed to limit their dependency on agencies. According to agent respondents, an oversupply of agencies complicated their relationships with both clients and temporary workers and made it increasingly difficult for them to meet the expectations of either party. Competition between agencies meant that employers often negotiated lower fees for hiring temporary staff. This limited agencies' ability to attract good quality temporary staff by offering higher wages or improved working conditions. Temporary worker respondents described social alienation, poor pay and benefits, and monotonous assignments as commonplace. In consequence, most workers had limited commitment to employers or agencies and would have preferred permanent employment. This research has demonstrated that labour market conditions and the structural contradictions of temporary work strongly influenced the activities of each group. The aims, expectations, and behaviours of the three sets of participants were often mutually incompatible, which limited the manoeuvrability of each group. This created outcomes that were often unintended, and frequently suboptimal, for all three parties.

Keywords

Temporary Work, Employment Agencies, Qualitative Research.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Biggs, David. 2006. "The decline of the temporary worker: A regional perspective." Local Economy 21 (3): 249-263.
  • Burgess, John and Julia Connell. 2006. "Temporary work and human resources management: issues, challenges and responses." Personnel Review 35 (2): 129-140.
  • Coe, Neil M., Jennifer Johns, and Kevin Ward. 2007. "Mapping the globalisation of the temporary staffing industry." The Professional Geographer 59 (4): 503-520.
  • Coe, Neil M., Jennifer Johns and Kevin Ward. 2009. "Agents of casualisation? The temporary staffing industry and labour market restructuring in Australia." Journal of Economic Geography 9 (1): 55-84.
  • De Cuyper, N., J. De Jong, H. De Witte, K. Isaksson, T.Rigotti and R. Schalk. 2008. "Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment : Towards a conceptual model." International Journal of Management Reviews 10 (1): 25-51.
  • De Graaf-Ziji, Marloes and Ernest E. Berkout. 2007. "Temporary agency work and the business cycle." International Journal of Manpower 28 (7): 539-556.
  • Dey, Matthew, Susan N. Houseman, and Anne E. Polivka. 2007. "Outsourcing to staffing agencies: How manufacturers' use of staffing agencies affects employment and productivity measurement." Employment Research 14 (1): 4-6.
  • Druker, Janet, and Celia Stanworth. 2004. "Mutual expectations: a study of the three-way relationship between employment agencies, their client organizations and white-collar agency 'temps'." Industrial Relations Journal 35 (1): 58-74.
  • Forde, Chris, and Gary Slater. 2006. "The nature and experience of agency working in Britain." Personnel Review 35 (2): 141-157.
  • Forde, Chris, Robert MacKenzie and Andrew Robinson. 2008. "Help wanted? Employers' use of temporary agencies in the UK construction industry." Employee Relations 30 (6): 679-698.
  • Giddens Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hall, Richard. 2006. "Temporary agency work and HRM in Australia: Cooperation, specialisation and satisfaction for the good of all?" Personnel Review 35 (2): 158-174.
  • Hoque, K., I. Kirkpatrick, A. De Ruyter, and C. Lonsdale. 2008. "New contractual relationships in the agency worker market: The case of the UK's National Health Service." British Journal of Industrial Relations 46 (3): 389-412.
  • Houseman, Susan N., Arne L. Kalleberg, and George A. Erickcer. 2003. "The role of temporary agency employment in tight labor markets." Industrial and Labor Relations Review 57 (1):105-128.
  • Mitlacher, Lars W. 2008. "Job quality and temporary agency work: Challenges for human resource management in triangular employment relations in Germany." The International Journal of Human Resource Management 18 (3): 446-460.
  • Ofstead, Cynthia M. 1999. "Temporary help firms as entrepreneurial actors." Sociological Forum 14 (2): 273-294.
  • Peck, Jamie, and Nik Theodore. 2007. "Flexible recession: the temporary staffing industry and mediated work in the United States." Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (2): 171-192.
  • Smith, Vicki, and Esther B. Neuwirth. 2009. "Temporary help agencies and the making of a new employment practice." Academy of Management Perspectives 23 (1): 56-72.
  • Theodore, Nik, and Jamie Peck. 2002. "The temporary staffing industry: growth imperatives and limits to contingency." Economic Geography 78 (4): 463-493.
  • Underhill, Elsa. (2010). "Should host employers have greater responsibility for temporary agency workers' employment rights?" Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 48 (3): 338-355.
  • Van Breugel, Gerla, Woody Van Offen, and Rene Olie. 2005. "Temporary liaisons: The commitment of 'temps' towards their agencies." Journal of Management Studies 42 (3): 539-566.
  • Vertane, M., M. Kivimak, M. Joensuu, P. Virtanen, M. Elovaino, and J. Vahtera, J. 2005. "Temporary employment and health: A review." International Journal of Epidemiology 34 (3): 610-622.
  • Ward, Kevin. 2003. "The changing business of the UK temporary staffing industry." Environment and Planning A 35: 889-907.
  • Ward, Kevin. 2004. "Going global: Internationalisation and diversification in the temporary staffing industry." Journal of Economic Geography 4 (3): 251-273.

Abstract Views: 200

PDF Views: 0




  • Reciprocal Frustrations: The Relationship between New Zealand Employers, Temporary Staffing Agencies and Clerical Temporary Workers

Abstract Views: 200  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jocelyn Handy
Massey University, New Zealand
Doreen Davy
Massey University, New Zealand

Abstract


This research explored the triangular working relationship between employers, temporary staffing agencies, and clerical temporary workers. The study used a qualitative approach to investigate the interdependent relationship between these three groups within the context of the Auckland labour market. Findings are based on in-depth interviews with ten employer representatives, ten employment agency consultants, and twenty female agency clerical workers. Interviews with the employer representatives revealed that employers wanted agencies to facilitate swift and unproblematic access to a reliable, hardworking, and disposable workforce with similar skills and commitment to permanent employees. Agencies were often unable to meet these requirements, and employers, therefore, developed various strategies designed to limit their dependency on agencies. According to agent respondents, an oversupply of agencies complicated their relationships with both clients and temporary workers and made it increasingly difficult for them to meet the expectations of either party. Competition between agencies meant that employers often negotiated lower fees for hiring temporary staff. This limited agencies' ability to attract good quality temporary staff by offering higher wages or improved working conditions. Temporary worker respondents described social alienation, poor pay and benefits, and monotonous assignments as commonplace. In consequence, most workers had limited commitment to employers or agencies and would have preferred permanent employment. This research has demonstrated that labour market conditions and the structural contradictions of temporary work strongly influenced the activities of each group. The aims, expectations, and behaviours of the three sets of participants were often mutually incompatible, which limited the manoeuvrability of each group. This created outcomes that were often unintended, and frequently suboptimal, for all three parties.

Keywords


Temporary Work, Employment Agencies, Qualitative Research.

References