Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Bayesian Provisionality Applied to an Epistemology of Science


Affiliations
1 University of the West of England, United Kingdom
2 Northumbria University, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Kuhn's work on the socio-epistemology of science gained far wider acceptance among cultural commentators than it did within science, where a strong adherence to Popper's principle of 'falsifiable predictions' remains strong. Many see this as a failure by science to relinquish its modernist traditions of truth and objectivity in the face of postmodern developments in philosophy, despite the highly speculative nature of science's theorising at the frontiers of knowledge. Our paper interrogates this fractured state of epistemology within science and proposes a novel approach based on provisional Bayesian constructs adapted from the field of sensory perception. Written from the perspective of a scientist with an interest in philosophy and a philosopher with an interest in science, our new approach is designed to overcome many of the concerns and limitations of both modern and postmodern philosophies. It could also be regarded as an important step towards reconciling the apparently incommensurable Kuhnian and Popperian models of science to encourage a more inclusive transdisciplinary approach to research across the arts, sciences and humanities.

Keywords

Bayesian Epistemology, Provisional Constructs, Epistemologies of Science.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bovens, Luc, and Stephan Hartmann. 2004. Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Broks, P. 2008. Understanding Popular Science. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  • Brown, T. L. 2008. Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Campbell, P. 2004. "Seeing and seeing: visual perception in art and science." Physics Education 39: 473-479.
  • Dayan, Peter, and Laurance F. Abbot. 2001. Theoretical Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. London: Athlone Press.
  • Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against Method. 3rd ed. London: Verso Books.
  • Fuller, S. 2006. Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for The Soul Of Science. Cambridge, UK: Icon Books.
  • Galison, P. 1998. "Judgement Against Objectivity." In Picturing Science: Producing Art, edited by Caroline A. Jones and Peter Galison, 327-359. New York: Routledge.
  • Greenblatt, S. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gross, Paul R., and Norman Levitt. 1994. Higher Superstition: the Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Hajeck, Alan, and Stephan Hartmann. 2010. "Bayesian Epistemology." In Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, 2nd ed., edited by Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa and Matthias Steup. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Hawking, Stephen, and Leonard Mlodinow. 2010. The Grand Design. London: Bantam Press.
  • Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
  • Jeffrey, R. 1992. Probability and the Art of Judgement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lyotard, J-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Lyotard, J-F. 1988. Postmodern Condition, and Peregrinations: Law, Form, Event. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lyotard, J-F. 1993. "A Svelte Appendix to the Postmodern Question." In Political Writings, edited and translated by Bill Readings and Kevin Paul Geiman, 25-29. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Magnusson, Sigurdur G. 2003. "The singularization of history: Social Knowledge and Microhistory within the Postmodern State of Knowledge." Journal of Social History 36: 701-735.
  • McGrayne, S. B. 2011. The theory that would not die. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Morgan, M. 2003. The Space Between Our Ears. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  • Ox, Jack and Judith Van der Elst. 2011. "How Metaphor Functions as a Vehicle of Thought: Creativity as a Necessity for Knowledge Building and Communication." Journal of Visual Art Practice 10: 83-102.
  • Panek, R. 2011. The 4% Universe. Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications.
  • Parkhill, D. F. 1966. The Challenge of the Computer Utility. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Popper, K. 1959. Logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
  • Sales, Arnaud, Marcel Fournier and Yan Senechal. 2007. "Knowledge, Communication, Reflexive Creativity and Social Change." In Knowledge, Communication and Creativity, edited by Arnaud Sales and Marcel Fournier, 1-40. London: Sage.
  • Sim, S. 2005. "Postmodernism and Philosophy." In The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. 2nd ed., edited by Stuart Sim, 3-14. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Sim, S. 2010. The End of Modernity. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Sim, S., ed. 2011. The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. 3rd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Sokal, A. D. 1996. "Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity." Social Text 46/47: 217-252.
  • Stafford, B. M. 1999. Visual Analogy: Consciousness as the Art of Connecting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Abstract Views: 173

PDF Views: 0




  • Bayesian Provisionality Applied to an Epistemology of Science

Abstract Views: 173  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Brett Wilson
University of the West of England, United Kingdom
Stuart Sim
Northumbria University, United Kingdom

Abstract


Kuhn's work on the socio-epistemology of science gained far wider acceptance among cultural commentators than it did within science, where a strong adherence to Popper's principle of 'falsifiable predictions' remains strong. Many see this as a failure by science to relinquish its modernist traditions of truth and objectivity in the face of postmodern developments in philosophy, despite the highly speculative nature of science's theorising at the frontiers of knowledge. Our paper interrogates this fractured state of epistemology within science and proposes a novel approach based on provisional Bayesian constructs adapted from the field of sensory perception. Written from the perspective of a scientist with an interest in philosophy and a philosopher with an interest in science, our new approach is designed to overcome many of the concerns and limitations of both modern and postmodern philosophies. It could also be regarded as an important step towards reconciling the apparently incommensurable Kuhnian and Popperian models of science to encourage a more inclusive transdisciplinary approach to research across the arts, sciences and humanities.

Keywords


Bayesian Epistemology, Provisional Constructs, Epistemologies of Science.

References