The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Rhetoric of Minority Government


Affiliations
1 Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper provides a rhetorical analysis of public policy development in a situation of minority government. In 2003, the New Zealand government, led by the Labour Party, was faced with the prospect of losing a parliamentary majority for itself and its existing allies over legislation its leaders believed was necessary to preserve its electoral support base and to secure national unity threatened by cultural/ethnic divisions arising from the issue concerned-namely the possibility of legal ownership by indigenous Maori of the country's foreshore and seabed. The paper identifies resources of language and rhetoric which the policy designers made use of during the course of the formal policy development process in the attempt to ameliorate opposition and secure additional parliamentary support. Such rhetoric was far from the deliberative, openly democratic style hoped for by advocates of reform prior to New Zealand's move in 1996 from a first-past-the-post electoral system to a proportional one.

Keywords

Rhetoric, Public Policy, Democracy, Indigenous Rights.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bazerman, Charles. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, 79–99.

  • Bazerman, Charles. 2002. What is not institutionally visible does not count: The problem of making activity assessable, accountable, and plannable. In Charles Bazerman and David R. Russell (eds), Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives. Perspectives on Writing, 428–482. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity, http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/.

  • Carpinter, Adele. 2003. The Foreshore and Seabed of New Zealand: Report on the Analysis of Submissions. Wellington: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.

  • Court of Appeal of New Zealand. 2003. Ngati Apa and Others v Attorney-General [2003] 3 NZLR 643.

  • Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2003. The Foreshore and Seabed of New Zealand: Protecting Public Access and Customary Rights: Government Proposals for Consultation. Wellington: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.

  • Devitt, Amy J. 2008. Writing Genres. Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberation Practices. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Fisheries and Other Sea-related Legislation Committee. 2004. Foreshore and Seabed Bill: Report of the Fisheries and Other Sea-related Legislation Committee. Wellington: House of Representatives.

  • Freadman, Anne. 1994. Anyone for tennis? In Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis, 43–66.

  • Ivie, Robert L. 2002. Rhetorical deliberation and democratic politics in the here and now. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 5(2): 277–285.

  • New Zealand First Party. 2004. NZ First pleased to reach agreement. Press Release, 7 April. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2003. Foreshore and Seabed: A Framework. Wellington: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

  • United Future New Zealand Party. 2004. UF withdraws support for foreshore legislation. Press Release, 7 April.

  • Wallace, Derek. 1998. Writing Policy: From monologue to dialogue. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 10: 58–62.


Abstract Views: 118

PDF Views: 0




  • The Rhetoric of Minority Government

Abstract Views: 118  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Derek Wallace
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Abstract


This paper provides a rhetorical analysis of public policy development in a situation of minority government. In 2003, the New Zealand government, led by the Labour Party, was faced with the prospect of losing a parliamentary majority for itself and its existing allies over legislation its leaders believed was necessary to preserve its electoral support base and to secure national unity threatened by cultural/ethnic divisions arising from the issue concerned-namely the possibility of legal ownership by indigenous Maori of the country's foreshore and seabed. The paper identifies resources of language and rhetoric which the policy designers made use of during the course of the formal policy development process in the attempt to ameliorate opposition and secure additional parliamentary support. Such rhetoric was far from the deliberative, openly democratic style hoped for by advocates of reform prior to New Zealand's move in 1996 from a first-past-the-post electoral system to a proportional one.

Keywords


Rhetoric, Public Policy, Democracy, Indigenous Rights.

References