The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Open Space for the Visually Impaired: Open or Excluded?


Affiliations
1 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Today, many people with special needs are still excluded from open spaces. For example, visually impaired people (VIP) face many barriers when they try to access open spaces, such as parks, independently. A case study on VIP access to parks in Hong Kong was conducted to examine the question of equal access for people with special needs. The focus of the study was on the difficulties of VIP in accessing parks. The study was qualitative in nature and used field observations, direct interviews and participatory research workshops with VIP. This paper first reviews the importance of openness in open space. It then introduces the background and the methods of the study. Using the research findings, the paper argues that parks, as one kind of open space, must be open not only for some people, but for everyone, including those with special needs. The paper further identifies a number of key directions for the park design that will promote openness and social inclusion.

Keywords

Blind, Exclusion, Open Space, Openness, Park, Participatory Research, Public Design, Visually Impaired People (VIP).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • American Planning Association. (2006). Planning and urban design standards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Au, C. W. D. (1993). A review of urban "green space" (open space and amenity area) planning in Hong Kong. Thesis. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

  • Aubock, M., & Cejka, A. (Eds.) (1996). Open space: The city. Wien: Verein Plan Box.

  • Buildings Department. (2008). Design manual-Barrier free access 2008. Retrieved September 14, 2011, from http://www.bd.gov.hk/english/documents/code/e_bfa2008.htm

  • Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://design-dev.ncsu.edu/openjournal/index.php/redlab/article/view/129/77

  • Chong, C. Y. (2011, April 27). Traps of tactile paving (Newspaper: am730) (Chinese ed.). Available September 17, 2011, from http://www.am730.com.hk/article.php?article=54053.

  • Cutter, J. (2007). Independent movement and travel in blind children: A promotion model. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.

  • Faruk, M., Ormerod, M., Newton, R., MacLennan, H., & Abbas, M. Y. (2008). Tactile paving a necessary intervention, but does it suit everyone?. In P. D. Bust (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Ergonomics (pp. 303-308). London: Taylor & Francis.

  • Francis, C. (1998). People places: Design guidelines for urban open space. New York: Wiley.

  • Francis, M. (2003). Urban open space: Designing for user needs. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Garvin, A., & Berens, G. (1997). Urban parks and open space. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

  • Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Girling, C. L., & Helphand, K. I. (1994). Yard, street, park: The design of suburban open space. New York: J. Wiley.

  • GovHK. (2011). Technology for the visually impaired. Available September 15, 2011, from http://www.gov.hk/en/residents/communication/visuallyimp/

  • Greed C. (2003). Inclusive urban design: Public toilets. Oxford: Architectural Press.

  • Greed, C. (2006). The role of the public toilet: Pathogen transmitter or health facilitator? Building Services Engineering Research & Technology, 27(2), 127-139.

  • Hamin, E. M., Geigis, P., & Silka, L. (Eds.) (2007). Preserving and enhancing communities: A guide for citizens, planners, and policymakers. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. New York: Blackwell.

  • Heckscher, A., & Robinson, P. (1977). Open spaces: The life of American cities. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Helal, A., Mokhtari, M., & Abdulrazak, B. (Eds.) (2008). The engineering handbook of smart technology for aging, disability, and independence. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Herie, E. J. (2005). Journey to independence: Blindness, the Canadian story. Toronto: Dundurn Group.

  • Hersh, M. A., & Johnson, M. A. (2008). Assistive technology for visually impaired and blind people. London: Springer.

  • Hong Kong Wetland Park. (2011). Visitor facilities: Barrier-free facilities. Available September 17, 2011, from http://www.wetlandpark.com/en/exhibition/facilities_barrier_free.asp

  • Huang, T. Y. M. (2004). Walking between slums and skyscrapers: Illusions of open space in Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Shanghai. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Imrie, R., & Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. London: Spon Press.

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (n.d.). ISO/CD 11550 Technical aids for blind and visually impaired persons: tactile ground surface indicators. Available

  • Jenness, J., & Singer, J. (2006). Visual detection of detectable warning materials by pedestrians with visual impairments (Final Report). Rockville, MD: Westat Research Corporation,

  • Kemp, R. L. (Ed.) (2006). Cities and nature: A handbook for renewal. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

  • Kihato, W. (Ed.) (2010). Urban diversity: Space, culture, and inclusive pluralism in cities worldwide. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

  • Lu, J. Y., Siu, K. W. M., & Xu, P. (2009). A comparative study of tactile paving design standards in different countries. Journal of Communication and Computer, 6(3), 47-54.

  • Lynch, K. (1990). The pattern of the metropolis. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp. 49-64). Cambridge,

  • Lynch, K. (1990). The openness of open space. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp. 396-412). Cambridge,

  • Lynch, K. (1990). Quality in city design. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp. 430-460). Cambridge,

  • Lynch, K. (1990). The possible city. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp. 771-788). Cambridge, MA:

  • Lynch, K., & Carr, S. (1990). Open space: Freedom and control. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp.

  • Lynch, K., & Rodwin, L. (1990). A theory of urban form. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp. 355-378).

  • Madanipour, A. (2010). Whose public space?: International case studies in urban design and development. New York: Routledge.

  • Marcus, C. C., & Carolyn, F. (1998). People places: Design guidelines for urban open space (2nd edition). New York: Wiley.

  • Matsumoto, M. (2001). Japanese guidelines for universal design in parks: Harmony between nature and people. In W. F. E. Preiser & E. Ostroff (Eds.), Universal design handbook

  • Moreno, D. (2006). Nature and the human spirit. In R. L. Kemp (Ed.), Cities and nature: A handbook for renewal (pp. 276-280) Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

  • Nishimaki, H. (2001). The making of garden cities: Milton Keynes, Irvine and Tsukaba. PhD thesis. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.

  • Oriental Daily. (2011, August 7). Tactile map installed in planter as rubbish. Available September 20, 2011, from http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20110807/00176_039.

  • Preiser, W. F. E., & Ostroff, E. (Eds.) (2001). Universal design handbook. New York: McGrawHill.

  • Rapuano, M., Pirone, P. P., & Wigginton, B. E. (1994). Open space in urban design: A report (Revised edition). Cleveland, OH: Cleveland Development Foundation.

  • Rehabilitation Alliance Hong Kong. (2005). Report of the study on public accessible toilets. Hong Kong: Rehabilitation Alliance Hong Kong.

  • Rendell, J., Penner, B., & Borden, I. (Eds.) (2000). Gender space architecture: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Routledge.

  • Sennett, R. (1970). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. New York: W. W. Norton.

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2001). The practice of everyday space: The reception of planned open space in Hong Kong. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2007a). A design theoretical review: Order and disorder. In W. C. Qian (Ed.), Transactions of K. C. Wong Education Foundation supported lectures, Volume 28

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2007b). Accessible design: Devices for blind persons to access buses. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2008a). Tactile guide paths: Guiding towards an inclusive society. Hong Kong: School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2008b). Quality in design: User-oriented design of public toilets for visually impaired persons. In H. Pham (Ed.), Recent advances in reliability and quality in

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2009). Inclusive design: Chinese chess for the visually impaired (Bilingual ed.). Hong Kong: School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

  • Siu, K. W. M. (2010). Open for all: Open spaces and new urban lifestyles. The International Journal of the Humanities, 7(12), 25-38.

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

  • Stephanidis, C. (Ed.) (2009). The universal access handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Stoneham, J., & Thoday, P. (1994). Landscape design for elderly & disabled people. Chichester:

  • The Hong Kong Society for Rehabilitation. (2011). Report―attractions―theme parks. Available September 19, 2011, from http://accessguide.hk/report/report_themeParks.asp

  • Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • van der Valk, A., & van Duk, T. (2009). Rethinking open space planning in metropolitan areas. In A. van der Valk and T. van Dijk (Eds.), Regional planning for open space (pp.

  • Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. New York: Museum of Modern Art.


Abstract Views: 214

PDF Views: 0




  • Open Space for the Visually Impaired: Open or Excluded?

Abstract Views: 214  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kin Wai Michael Siu
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Abstract


Today, many people with special needs are still excluded from open spaces. For example, visually impaired people (VIP) face many barriers when they try to access open spaces, such as parks, independently. A case study on VIP access to parks in Hong Kong was conducted to examine the question of equal access for people with special needs. The focus of the study was on the difficulties of VIP in accessing parks. The study was qualitative in nature and used field observations, direct interviews and participatory research workshops with VIP. This paper first reviews the importance of openness in open space. It then introduces the background and the methods of the study. Using the research findings, the paper argues that parks, as one kind of open space, must be open not only for some people, but for everyone, including those with special needs. The paper further identifies a number of key directions for the park design that will promote openness and social inclusion.

Keywords


Blind, Exclusion, Open Space, Openness, Park, Participatory Research, Public Design, Visually Impaired People (VIP).

References