The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Towards Equity-Based Regional Development: Addressing Spatial Inequality in the Blitar Region


Affiliations
1 Diponegoro University, Indonesia
2 Local Government of Blitar Regency, Indonesia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Spatial inequality can be defined as disparities among spatial units of a region that can easily be perceived by people, e.g. some spatial units can provide proper and affordable public facilities and infrastructure while some others cannot. This phenomenon has long been there in the Blitar Region, Indonesia, where the north part of it is seen by people as more developed than the south part. Spatial inequality matters because, firstly, it could be caused by equity failures and secondly, this may worsen the imbalance spatial interactions, which can further cause problems like unoptimum economic growth, inequality of welfare, and even unsustainability. It is unfortunate that the inverted U-shape rule of spatial inequality as hypothesised by many seems inapplicable here. This paper is based on research answering the problem of what factors have been there and how they work to result in the spatial inequality of the Blitar Region. A set of propositions was developed from literature discussions and was then confirmed in the case of the Blitar Region, comprising Blitar City and Blitar Regency administratively. The quantitative approach is utilised in this research, due to the need to understand the general characteristics of spatial inequality in the Blitar Region. The main findings confirm that it is inequity, especially in the distribution of development benefits, that matters and that the inverted U-shape rule needs equity to be ensured to work. Essential measures needed to alleviate the inequity are recommended.

Keywords

Equity-Based Development, Inverted U-Shape Rule, Regional Development, Spatial Inequality.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alonso, W. 1980. "Five bell shapes in development." Regional Science 45(1): 5-16.

  • Barry, B. 1989. Theories of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • BCSO (Blitar City Statistical Office). 2010. Kota Blitar Dalam Angka 2009 (Blitar City in Figures 2009). Blitar: BCSO.

  • BRG (Blitar Regency Government). 2008. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Blitar 2008-2028 (The Spatial Plan of Blitar Regency 2008-2028). Blitar: BRG.

  • BRSO (Blitar Regency Statistical Office). 2010. Kabupaten Blitar Dalam Angka 2009 (Blitar Regency in Figures 2009). Blitar: BRSO.

  • Bungin, B. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik Serta Ilmu-ilmu Sosial lainnya (Quantitative Research Methodology: Communications, Economics, Public Policy Studies and Other Social Sciences). Jakarta: Kencana.

  • Combes, P.P., M. Lafourcade, J.F. Thisse and J.C. Toutaini. 2011. "The rise and fall of spatial inequalities in France: A long-run perspective." Explorations in Economic History. in press.

  • Friedmann, J. 1966. Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  • Gilbert, A. 1982. "Urban Agglomeration and Regional Disparities." In Cities, Poverty, and Development: Urbanization in the Third World, eds. A. Gilbert and J. Gugler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Glasson, J. 1992. An Introduction to Regional Planning: Concepts. Theory and Practice. Second Edition - Sixth Impression. London: UCL Press.

  • Hamlin, R.E. and T.S. Lyons. 1996. Economy Without Walls. Connecticut: Praeger. Johnson, E.A.J. 1970. The Organization of Space in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Kanbur, R. and A.J. Venables. 2005. "Spatial Inequality and Development." In Spatial Inequality and Development, eds. R. Kanbur and A.J. Venables. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kim, S. 2008. Spatial Inequality and Economic Development: Theories, Facts, and Policies. Working Paper No. 16. Washington: World Bank.

  • Kuncoro, M. 2005. Lecture 4: Spatial Inequality. A lecture material. Online. http://www.mudrajad.com [February 22, 2011].

  • Kuznets, S. 1955. "Economic growth and income inequality." American Economic ReviewMarch: 1-28.

  • Li, Y. and Y.H.D. Wei. 2010. "The spatial-temporal hierarchy of regional inequality of China." Applied Geography 30: 303-16.

  • Lo, F.C, K. Salih and M. Douglass. 1981. "Rural Urban Transformation in Asia." In Rural-urban Relations and Regional Development, ed. F.C. Lo. Nagoya: Maruzen Asia-UNCRD. Meriam-Webster Dictionary. 2006. Online. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/equity [April 15, 2006].

  • PDI-P (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia-Perjuangan). 2010. 3 Bacabup Blitar Paparkan Visi Misi (Three Regent Candidates of Blitar Present Vision and Mision). online. http://www.pdiperjuangan-jatim.org/v03/index.php?mod=berita&id=3176 [February 19, 2011].

  • Pieterse, J.N. 2001. Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions. London: SAGE Publications.

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • "Equality of What?" In Tanner Lectures on Human Values I, ed. S. McMurrin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Slater, D. 1975. "Approaches to the problems of regional planning in the third world." Progress in Planning 4(2): 97-167.

  • Sugiri, A. 2010. "Developing Sustainability Indicators by Communities: Lessons Learned from the Spatial Planning of Kembang Tanjong District." The International Journal of the Humanities 8(4): 257-66.

  • "Redressing Equity Issues in Natural Resource-Rich Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Sustaining Development in East Kalimantan, Indonesia." In Environmental Ethics: Sustainability and Education, ed. E. Weber. Oxford: Inter-disciplinary Press.

  • Sugiri, A., I. Buchori and S. Soetomo. 2011. "Sustainable Metropolitan Development: Towards An Operational Model for Semarang Metropolitan Region." The International Journal of Environmental. Cultural. Economic and Social Sustainability 7(5): 301-23.

  • World Bank. 2006. World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. Outline. http://www.worldbank.org/wdr [November 15, 2006].

  • Zeng, D.Z. and L. Zhao. 2010. "Globalization. interregional and international inequalities." Journal of Urban Economics 67: 352-361.


Abstract Views: 136

PDF Views: 0




  • Towards Equity-Based Regional Development: Addressing Spatial Inequality in the Blitar Region

Abstract Views: 136  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Agung Sugiri
Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Nurul Nuraini
Local Government of Blitar Regency, Indonesia

Abstract


Spatial inequality can be defined as disparities among spatial units of a region that can easily be perceived by people, e.g. some spatial units can provide proper and affordable public facilities and infrastructure while some others cannot. This phenomenon has long been there in the Blitar Region, Indonesia, where the north part of it is seen by people as more developed than the south part. Spatial inequality matters because, firstly, it could be caused by equity failures and secondly, this may worsen the imbalance spatial interactions, which can further cause problems like unoptimum economic growth, inequality of welfare, and even unsustainability. It is unfortunate that the inverted U-shape rule of spatial inequality as hypothesised by many seems inapplicable here. This paper is based on research answering the problem of what factors have been there and how they work to result in the spatial inequality of the Blitar Region. A set of propositions was developed from literature discussions and was then confirmed in the case of the Blitar Region, comprising Blitar City and Blitar Regency administratively. The quantitative approach is utilised in this research, due to the need to understand the general characteristics of spatial inequality in the Blitar Region. The main findings confirm that it is inequity, especially in the distribution of development benefits, that matters and that the inverted U-shape rule needs equity to be ensured to work. Essential measures needed to alleviate the inequity are recommended.

Keywords


Equity-Based Development, Inverted U-Shape Rule, Regional Development, Spatial Inequality.

References