Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Human Rights, Information, and Communication Technology (ICT): A Case Study of Art Education Teacher Candidates


Affiliations
1 University of Manitoba, Canada
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Case study research on human rights education is addressed within the context of a pre-service course entitled, "digiART and Human Rights: A New Media, Arts Integrated Project". The research was conducted during the fall-winter 2011/2012. The authors drew upon work during a previous 2011 Faculty of Education Summer Graduate Institute and incorporated these concepts into developing meaningful curricula using contemporary technologies. Following Tibbitts (2002) Human Rights Education Paradigm of the (1) values/awareness model (2) accountability model and (3) transformational model investigators found that models 1 and 3 served to enlighten teacher candidates' approaches to teaching human rights issues in which they incorporated ICT. New media processes during the preproduction to postproduction are described. This case study has potential for broader applicability across disciplines and provides incentive for a renewed dialogue about the value of visual arts and art education.

Keywords

Human Rights, Human Rights Education, Visual Arts Education, Information & Communication Technology (ICT), New Media, Teacher Education, Social Reconstructionism, Contemporary Art Education Practices.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anderson, T. 2003. "Art Education for life". International Journal of Art and Design 22.1: 58- 66.
  • Ballengee-Morris, C. and Taylor, P. G. 2005."You can hide but you can't run: Interdisciplinary and culturally sensitive approaches to mask making". Art Education 12:12-17.
  • Bastos, F. 2010. "New media art education". Art Education 63.1: 4-5.
  • Black, J. 2013. "Overcoming problems integrating digital technologies in contemporary art education practice: ten suggestions". The International Journal of the Arts in Society (in press).
  • Bottle, Barb. 2011. Text from an art journal. Copy in possession of authors.
  • Boughton, D. 2005. "Form fine art to visual culture: Assessment and changing role of art education". International Journal of Education through Art 1.3:211-222.
  • Boyd,J. E. 2011. "A multicultural and social reconstructionist approach to Art Education: A framework for social justice through art curriculum". PhD diss., Ohio State University.
  • Chalmers, G. 2002. "Celebrating pluralism six years later - visual transculture/s, education, and critical multiculturalism". Studies in Art Education 43.4: 293-306.
  • Chung, S.K. 2007. "Art education and digital storytelling". Art Education 60.2: 17-22.
  • Cuban, L. 2001. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Cunliffe, L. 2008." A case study of an extra-curricular school activity designed to promote creativity". International Journal of Education through Art 4.1: 91-105.
  • Darts, D. 2004. "Visual culture jam: Art pedagogy, and creative resistance". Studies in Art Education 45.4: 313-327.
  • Darts, D. 2006. "Art education for a change: Contemporary issues and the visual arts". Art Education 59.5: 6-12.
  • Delacruz, E. M.2004. "Teachers' working conditions and the unmet promise of technology". Studies in Art Education 46.1: 6-19.
  • Delacruz, E.M. 2009a. "Art education aims in the Age of New Media: Moving toward global civil society". Art Education 62.5: 13-17.
  • Delacruz, E. M. 2009b. "From bricks and mortar to the public sphere in cyberspace: Creating a culture of caring on the digital global commons". International Journal of Education in the Arts 10.5:1-21.
  • Delacruz, E.M. 2009c. "Old world teaching meets the new digital cultural creative". International Journal of Art and Design Education 28.1: 261-268.
  • Delacruz, E.M. 2009d. "Introduction globalizing, art, and education: Mapping the terrain". In Globalization, art, and education, edited by Delacruz, E.M., Arnold,A., Kuo,A. & Parson, A. x-xvii. Reston.: National Art Education Association.
  • Delacruz,E.M. 2011. "Entrepreneurial strategies for advancing arts-based public engagement as a form of university-sanctioned professional activity in the new creative economy". International Journal of Education and the Arts 12.1:1-25.
  • Dissanayake, E. What is art for? 1988. USA: University of Washington Press.
  • Eisner, E. 2002. The arts and the creation of the mind. USA: R.R. Donnelley & Sons.
  • Freedman, K. 2003. "Social perspectives of Art Education in the U.S.: Teaching visual culture in a democracy". InJAE 1.3: 67-88. Gouzouasis, P. 2006. "Technology as arts-based education: Does the desktop reflect the arts?" Arts Education Policy Review 107.5: 3-9.
  • Gregory, D. 2009. "Boxes with fire: Wisely integrating learning technologies into the art classroom". Art Education 62.3: 47-54.
  • Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
  • Jenkins, H. 2009. "Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century". Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • McCarthy, K., Ondaatje, E., Zakaras, L., Brooks, A. 2004. Gifts of the Muse: reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. USA: Rand Corporation.
  • Merriam, S. B. 1998. Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Milbrandt, M. K. 2002. "Addressing contemporary social issues in Art Education: A survey of public school art educators in Georgia". Studies in Art Education 43.2: 141-157.
  • Mullen, C. and Rahn, J. 2010. Perspective on new media curriculum in the arts. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
  • Palfrey J. & Gasser, U. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
  • Peppler, K. 2010. "Media arts: Art Education for a digital age". Teachers College Record 112.6: 2118-2153.
  • Roland, C. 2010. "Preparing art teachers to teach in a new digital landscape". Art Education 63.1: 17-24.
  • Sanders, J. 2006. "Visual culture studies and human rights". Visual Arts Research 32.2: 21-25.
  • Speigelman, A. 1991. Maus 1: A survivor's tale: My father bleeds history. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Speigelman, A. 1991. Maus 1: A survivor's tale: And here my troubles begin. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Stake, R. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Sweeny, R. 2010. "Technology always and forever". In Inter/actions/inter/sections: Art education in a digital visual culture , ed. R. Sweeny, ix-xvii. Reston: National Art Education Association Publication.
  • Tapscott, D. 2009. Grown up digital: How the Net Generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Tibbitts, F. 2002. "Understanding what we do: Emerging models for human rights education". International Review of Education 48.3-4: 159-171.
  • Tillander, M. 2011. "Creativity, technology, art and pedagogical practices". Art Education 64.1: 40-46.
  • Watkins, S. C. 2009. The young & the digital: What the migration to social network sites, games and anytime, anywhere, media means for our future. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Watts, J. K. 2008. "Teaching digital media as an art class: A search to define a curriculum". PhD diss., Arizona State University.
  • Wilks, J., Cutcher, A. and Wilks, S. 2012. "Digital technology in the visual arts classroom: An [un]easy partnership". Studies in Art Education 54.1: 54-65.
  • Yin, Robert. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Abstract Views: 224

PDF Views: 0




  • Human Rights, Information, and Communication Technology (ICT): A Case Study of Art Education Teacher Candidates

Abstract Views: 224  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Joanna Black
University of Manitoba, Canada
Orest Cap
University of Manitoba, Canada

Abstract


Case study research on human rights education is addressed within the context of a pre-service course entitled, "digiART and Human Rights: A New Media, Arts Integrated Project". The research was conducted during the fall-winter 2011/2012. The authors drew upon work during a previous 2011 Faculty of Education Summer Graduate Institute and incorporated these concepts into developing meaningful curricula using contemporary technologies. Following Tibbitts (2002) Human Rights Education Paradigm of the (1) values/awareness model (2) accountability model and (3) transformational model investigators found that models 1 and 3 served to enlighten teacher candidates' approaches to teaching human rights issues in which they incorporated ICT. New media processes during the preproduction to postproduction are described. This case study has potential for broader applicability across disciplines and provides incentive for a renewed dialogue about the value of visual arts and art education.

Keywords


Human Rights, Human Rights Education, Visual Arts Education, Information & Communication Technology (ICT), New Media, Teacher Education, Social Reconstructionism, Contemporary Art Education Practices.

References