The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Prophetic Reason for Religious and Cultural Understanding


Affiliations
1 Griffith University, Australia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Interreligious and intercultural dialogue is supposed to be the best way to solve the conflicts arising from rival religious hermeneutics and different modes to conceive the ideal of a good life in contemporary multicultural and pluralistic societies. In regard to communicative or dialogical reason, respectful coexistence can be reached only by argumentative communication between interested people. In this sense, only rational arguments, strong enough to pass the test of the shared rationality can be valid at a discursive level. However, Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas and Catholic theologian Johann Baptist Metz challenge symmetrical and rational-based dialogue in order to postulate an asymmetrical relationship by giving voice to the other. For them, the core of interreligious and intercultural engagement does not start from rational agreements as Habermas, for instance, has proposed; but from prophetic and anamnestic reasons. This analytical and comparative presentation will show the possibilities of anamnestic reason and religion as service against dialogical reason in intercultural and interreligious contexts. Levinas's and Metz's criticism of dialogical reason opens new perspectives which contribute to reflection for both political theology and political philosophy.

Keywords

Levinas, Metz, Religion, Culture, Dialogue, Prophetic Reason.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Buber, Martin. 1996. I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Simon & Schuster Cortina, Adela. 2000. Etica Minima: Introduccion a la Filosofia Práctica, 6th ed. Madrid: Tecnos.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Acts of Religion. Edited by Gil Anidjar, New York: Routledge. Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 2000, "Multiples Modernities." Daedalus, 129(1): 1-29, doi: 10.2307/20027613.

  • Gadamer, Hans-George. 2004, Truth and Method. London: Continuum.

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 2005. "Israel and Athens, or to Whom Does Anamnestic Reason Belong?" In The Frankfurt School on Religion: Key Writings by the Major Thinkers, edited by Eduardo Mendieta, 293-301. New York: Routledge.

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 2008a. Between Naturalism and Religion: Political Essays. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 2008b. "El resurgimiento de la Religion, ¿Un reto para la auto comprension de la modernidad?" Dianoia, LIII(60): 3-20.

  • Kung, Hans. 1993, Global Responsibility. Translated by. John Bowden. New York: Continuum. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1991, Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1994. Nine Talmudic Readings. Translated by Annette Aronowicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1997. Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism. Translated by Sean Hand. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1998. Of God Who Comes to Mind. Translated by Bettina Bergo, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1999. Alterity and Transcendence. Translated by Michael B. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1969. "Repressive Tolerance," In A Critique of Pure Tolerance, edited by Wolff, Robert, Barrington Moore, and Herbert Marcuse. 95-137. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Metz, Johann Baptist. 1980. Faith in History and Society. Translated by David Smith. New York: The Seabury Press.

  • Metz, Johann Baptist. 1998. A Passion for God. Translated by J. Mattew Ashley. New York: Paulist Press.

  • Metz, Johann Baptist. 1999a, Por una cultura de la memoria. Translated by Jose M. Ortega Barcelona: Anthropos.

  • Metz, Johann Baptist. 1999b. "In the Pluralism of Religious and cultural Worlds: Notes Towards a Theological and Political Program," Cross Currents, 49(2): 227-236.

  • Metz, Johann Baptist. 2005. "Anamnestic Reason: A Theologian's Remarks on the Crisis in the Geisteswissenschaften." In The Frankfurt School on Religion: Key Writings by the Major Thinkers, edited by Eduardo Mendieta, 285-289. New York: Routledge.

  • Popper, Karl. 1971. The Open Society and its enemies. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Rorty, Richard. 1992. The Linguistic Turn: Essays on Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Salvarani, Brunetto. 2011. Il dialogo e finito? Ripensare la Chiesa nel tempo del pluralismo e del cristianesimo globale. Bologna: Edizione Dehoniane.

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1991. Volkerrechtliche Grossraumordnung mit Interventionsverbot furraumfremde Machte. Ein Beitrag zum Reichsbegriff fur Völkerrecht. Berlin: Duncker and Humboldt.

  • Walzer, Michael. 1999. On Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press.


Abstract Views: 142

PDF Views: 0




  • The Prophetic Reason for Religious and Cultural Understanding

Abstract Views: 142  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Manuel Losada-Sierra
Griffith University, Australia
John Mandalios
Griffith University, Australia

Abstract


Interreligious and intercultural dialogue is supposed to be the best way to solve the conflicts arising from rival religious hermeneutics and different modes to conceive the ideal of a good life in contemporary multicultural and pluralistic societies. In regard to communicative or dialogical reason, respectful coexistence can be reached only by argumentative communication between interested people. In this sense, only rational arguments, strong enough to pass the test of the shared rationality can be valid at a discursive level. However, Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas and Catholic theologian Johann Baptist Metz challenge symmetrical and rational-based dialogue in order to postulate an asymmetrical relationship by giving voice to the other. For them, the core of interreligious and intercultural engagement does not start from rational agreements as Habermas, for instance, has proposed; but from prophetic and anamnestic reasons. This analytical and comparative presentation will show the possibilities of anamnestic reason and religion as service against dialogical reason in intercultural and interreligious contexts. Levinas's and Metz's criticism of dialogical reason opens new perspectives which contribute to reflection for both political theology and political philosophy.

Keywords


Levinas, Metz, Religion, Culture, Dialogue, Prophetic Reason.

References