The International Journal of the Arts in Society: Annual Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Aesthetics of Craft Production: With Reference to the Culture Industry Proposal by UNESCO in the Context of India


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the backdrop of the UNESCO's endeavor to promote cultural industries in Asia-Pacific region, India's enthusiasm can be conspicuously seen in hosting the symposium which finalized the background document for a holistic development of the sector. The agenda set by this document is multipronged; however, 'income generation' and 'wealth creation' appear to be more significant. This document has identified different slots for different markers of culture amongst which 'crafts' are also marked as a separate slot. However UNESCO's proposal cannot ignore Frankfurt School critiques. Overall, there has been a critique of over-administered culture that promises an 'integral freedom' but gets fragmented into high art and products of culture industry that never sum up to what they promise (Adorno, 1991). Cultural sociologists have taken a neutral stand and analyze them just as other important institutions, engaged in creative processes of cultural production (Santoro, 2008). Nevertheless, the critiques of culture industries remain relevant. Culture industries define themselves on the criteria of 'creativity', 'cultural knowledge' and 'intellectual property'. They will have to be accommodated with each other on these issues and explore other kinds of relationships that pertain to art, communities and religion rather than only to the pecuniary ones. In crafts communities, art and religion are very significant, yet we have modern knowledge and technology which have been posing as challenges to be reconciled. Aesthetics of crafts are a melange of the above mentioned forces, and the neglect of even a single phenomenon would be an injustice to the crafts at large.

Keywords

Aesthetics, Crafts, Creativity, Culture Industries, Communities.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adorno, Theodore W. 1991. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass culture in J.M. Bernstein (ed.). London: Routledge.

  • Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max. 1997. 'The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception' in Dialectic of Enlightenment. Verso Classic.

  • Baudrillard Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

  • Becker, Howard. (Jan., 1978). 'Arts and Crafts', in The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 4: pp. 862-889. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Bhattacharya Sabyasachi (ed.). 1997. The Mahatma and the Poet: Letters and Debates Between Gandhi and Tagore, 1915-1941. India: NBT.

  • Chattopadhyay, Kamladevi. 1976. Handicrafts of India. Delhi: Indian Council of Cultural Relations.

  • Collingwood, R.G. 1938. 'Art and Craft' in The Principles of Art. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Coomarswamy, Ananda K. 1909. The Indian Craftsman. London: Probsthian.

  • Coomarswamy, Ananda K. 1946. Figures of Speech or Figures of Thought: Collected Essays on the Traditional or Normal View of Art. London: Luzac & Co.

  • Gadamer, H. 1975. Truth and Method. London: Continuum.

  • Gandhi, M. 1938. Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule. Ahemdabad: Navajivan Trust.

  • Gandhi, M. 1929. The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Ahemdabad: Navajivan Trust.

  • Heidegger, M. 1977. 'The Question Concerning Technology', in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, pp.3-35. New York & London: Garland Publishing INC.

  • Jaaware Aniket. 2009. 'Disarticulating the Senses: A Speculation on a Scientific Discovery and Cinema' in Amiya Dev (ed.) Science, Literature and Aesthetics. Volume XV, Part 3. Centre for Studies in Civilization for the Project of History of Science, Philosophy and Culture.

  • Kant Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Paul Guyer (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • LaChapelle, Joseph R. 1983. 'Creativity Research: Its Sociological and Educational Limitations' in Studies in Art Education. Vol. 24, No. 2: pp. 131-139. National Art Education Association.

  • Marx, Karl. 1975. 'Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844' in Early Writings, Harmonds worth: Penguin.

  • Morris, W. 1889. The Arts and Crafts of Today, (See in http://www.marxists.org/archive/morris/works/1889/today.htm.

  • Mukerji, Chandra. (Sep., 1978). 'Artwork Collection and Contemporary Culture', in The American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 84, No. 2: pp. 348-365. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Riegl, Alois. 1992. Problems of Style: Foundations for a History of Ornament, trans. by Evelyn Kain. Princeton University Press.

  • Ruskin, John. 1887. Lectures on Art. Kent: Georg Allen.

  • Sanil. V. 2009. 'The Diagram of Vastu Purusa Mandala: From Meaning to Measurement', in Amiya Dev (ed.) Science, Literature and Aesthetics. Volume XV, Part 3. Centre for Studies in Civilization for the Project of History of Science, Philosophy and Culture.

  • Santoro Marco (a). 2008. Volume 2(1). 'Culture As (And After) Production' in Cultural Sociology, pp. 7-31. SAGE Publications.

  • Santoro Marco (b). 2008. Volume 2(1). 'Producing Cultural Sociology: An Interview with Richard A. Peterson', in Cultural Sociology pp. 33-55. SAGE Publications.

  • Sayers, Sean. 2003. 'Creativity Activity and Alienation in Hegel and Marx' in Historical Materialism. Volume 11:1. Pp.107-128. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

  • Shull K. K. Fall 2005. 'Is the Magic Gone? Weber's "Disenchantment of the World" and its Implications for Art in Today's World', in The Culture Issue, Anamesa. Fall 2005, Volume 3, Issue 2: pp.61-73. (Refer, www.anamesa.org).

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. 1999. 'The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms', in R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity, pp. 3-15. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tagore, R. 1964. 'The Religion of an artist', in Vision of India, pp.4-17. Indian Council for Cultural Relation.

  • Tolstoi, C. L. N. 1899. What is Art? New York: Thomas Y Crowell & Co. Publishers.

  • Venkatesan, Soumhya. 2006. 'Shifting Balances in a 'Craft Community': The Mat Weavers of Pattamadai, South India', Contributions to Indian Sociology. 2006; 40: pp. 63-87.

  • Watson Elizabeth. December 2007. 'Who or What Creates? A Conceptual Framework for Social Creativity', Human Resource Development. Review Vol. 6, No.4: 419-441. Sage Publications.

  • Weber, Max. 1930 [1904]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. by Talcott Parsons with a forward by R.H. Tawney. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.


Abstract Views: 137

PDF Views: 0




  • Aesthetics of Craft Production: With Reference to the Culture Industry Proposal by UNESCO in the Context of India

Abstract Views: 137  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ravi Shankar Mishra
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

Abstract


In the backdrop of the UNESCO's endeavor to promote cultural industries in Asia-Pacific region, India's enthusiasm can be conspicuously seen in hosting the symposium which finalized the background document for a holistic development of the sector. The agenda set by this document is multipronged; however, 'income generation' and 'wealth creation' appear to be more significant. This document has identified different slots for different markers of culture amongst which 'crafts' are also marked as a separate slot. However UNESCO's proposal cannot ignore Frankfurt School critiques. Overall, there has been a critique of over-administered culture that promises an 'integral freedom' but gets fragmented into high art and products of culture industry that never sum up to what they promise (Adorno, 1991). Cultural sociologists have taken a neutral stand and analyze them just as other important institutions, engaged in creative processes of cultural production (Santoro, 2008). Nevertheless, the critiques of culture industries remain relevant. Culture industries define themselves on the criteria of 'creativity', 'cultural knowledge' and 'intellectual property'. They will have to be accommodated with each other on these issues and explore other kinds of relationships that pertain to art, communities and religion rather than only to the pecuniary ones. In crafts communities, art and religion are very significant, yet we have modern knowledge and technology which have been posing as challenges to be reconciled. Aesthetics of crafts are a melange of the above mentioned forces, and the neglect of even a single phenomenon would be an injustice to the crafts at large.

Keywords


Aesthetics, Crafts, Creativity, Culture Industries, Communities.

References