Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Emergent Interdisciplinary Art Curriculum: A Constructivist Approach


Affiliations
1 East Carolina University, North Carolina, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This presentation reviews emergent studio occasions that suggest how creative, interdisciplinary projects and knowledge from biometrics, nanotechnology, and geography can be integrated into basic design, art education, and art studio projects. In the United States, students from a variety of disciplines take basic design studio courses to fulfill Fine Arts general education requirements. These students often see unique connections between their home disciplines and visual art. By attending to students' perceptions of interdisciplinary relations, art educators can create relevant curriculum for broader populations and by doing so enrich the visual art curriculum. Using this approach, interdisciplinary visual art education can be integrated earlier in students' academic programs. A constructivist strategy for developing this new curriculum is to take note of the connections the students perceive. In education, 21st century academic silos have replaced C. P. Snow's Two Cultures. Academic structures (silos) divide and isolate experience and knowledge to construct and define academic epistemology within a discipline. The academic structures are intended to replicate the disciplines. However, students who are not yet experts in a particular academic area sometimes perceive exciting new areas for exploration.

Keywords

Emergent Pedagogy, Interdisciplinary Basic Design, Constructivist Education, Academic Silos, Domains of a Discipline.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bauch, P. (1985). Unpublished lecture. The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
  • Bickley-Green, C. (1995). Math and art curriculum integration: A post-modern foundation. Studies in Art Education, 37(1), 6-18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1320488
  • Brown, A. (2010, February 27). Traditionally experimental: Exploration in the use of traditional metalworking processes. Paper presented at the Science of Art Exhibition 2010. East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
  • Catts, O. (2002, August). Welcome. The aesthetics of care. SymbioticA, School of Anatomy and Human Biology, University of Western Australia. Retrieved from www.tca.uwa.edu.au/publication/ THE_AESTHETICS_OF_CARE.pdf
  • Century, M. (1999). Pathways to innovation in digital culture. Centre for Research on Canadian Cultural Industries. McGill University. Retrieved from http://nextcentury.ca/PI/PI.html
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008, December 22). The creative person and the creative context. Retrieved on July 17, 2010, from http://www.exploratorium.edu/media/
  • Dogan, M. (1999). Marginality. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 179-185). London: Academic Press.
  • Efland, A. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134-153.
  • Gude, O. (n. d.). Investigating the culture of curriculum. UIC Spiral Art Education. Retrieved from http://www.uic.edu/classes/ad/ad382/index.html
  • Hafferty, F. W. (1998). Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med, 73(4), 403-7.
  • Illich, I. (1970, November). Deschooling society. Retrieved from http://www.preservenet.com/ theory/Illich/Deschooling/Intro.html
  • Jabine, T. B., Straf, M. L., Tanur, J. M., & Tourangeau, R. (Eds). (1984). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building bridges between disciplines. Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Kelly, A. V. (2009) The curriculum theory and practice (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
  • Klein, M. F., Tye, K. A., Wright, J. E. (1979, December). A study of schooling: Curriculum. The Phi Delta Kappan, 61(4), 244-248. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20385424
  • Kolowich, S. (2010, January 18). Blasting academic silos. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/2010/01/18/silos
  • Macdonald, J. P. (1987). Domain of curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1(3), 205- 214.
  • May, H. (2011). Shifting the curriculum: Decentralization in the art education experience. Art Education: The Journal of the National Art Education Association, (64)3, 33-40.
  • Murakami, M., Kawabata, H., & Maezawa, M. (2009, December). The perception of the hidden curriculum on medical education: An exploratory study. Asian Pacific Family Medicine, 8(9). Retrieved from http://apfmj.com/content/8/1/9
  • National Partnership for 21st Century Skills (n. d.). A framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/
  • NBPTS (1987). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Retrieved from www.nbpts.org.
  • Olander, C. (2010, October). Tracking what we see. Paper presented at the meeting of the North Carolina Art Education Association Professional Development Conference, New Bern, NC. Copresenter Cynthia Bickley-Green.
  • Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Viking Press. Originally published in 1948 by UNESCO in French as Ou va l'education?
  • Spiro, R. & Deschryver, M. (n.d.). Constructivism: When it's the wrong idea and when it's the only idea. Cognitive Flexibility Theory and the Post-Gutenberg Mind: Rand Spiro's Home Page. Retrieved from http://postgutenburg.typepad.com/newgutenbergrevolution
  • Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Part 1 first published in 1959.
  • Wieder, B. (2011, May 25). Thiel Fellowship pays 24 talented students $100,000 not to attend college. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronical .com/article/Thiel-Fellowship- Pays-24/127622
  • Wilson, D. S. & Heywood, L. (2008, May). Integrating the humanities and sciences: A campus-wide program at Binghamton University that addresses a general problem in higher education. EVOS Evolutionary Studies Program at Binghamton University. Retrieved from http://evolution.binghamton.edu.evos

Abstract Views: 143

PDF Views: 0




  • Emergent Interdisciplinary Art Curriculum: A Constructivist Approach

Abstract Views: 143  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Cynthia Bickley-Green
East Carolina University, North Carolina, United States

Abstract


This presentation reviews emergent studio occasions that suggest how creative, interdisciplinary projects and knowledge from biometrics, nanotechnology, and geography can be integrated into basic design, art education, and art studio projects. In the United States, students from a variety of disciplines take basic design studio courses to fulfill Fine Arts general education requirements. These students often see unique connections between their home disciplines and visual art. By attending to students' perceptions of interdisciplinary relations, art educators can create relevant curriculum for broader populations and by doing so enrich the visual art curriculum. Using this approach, interdisciplinary visual art education can be integrated earlier in students' academic programs. A constructivist strategy for developing this new curriculum is to take note of the connections the students perceive. In education, 21st century academic silos have replaced C. P. Snow's Two Cultures. Academic structures (silos) divide and isolate experience and knowledge to construct and define academic epistemology within a discipline. The academic structures are intended to replicate the disciplines. However, students who are not yet experts in a particular academic area sometimes perceive exciting new areas for exploration.

Keywords


Emergent Pedagogy, Interdisciplinary Basic Design, Constructivist Education, Academic Silos, Domains of a Discipline.

References