Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Singh, Manudeo
- Protocols for Riverine Wetland Mapping and Classification Using Remote Sensing and GIS
Abstract Views :254 |
PDF Views:94
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, IN
1 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 07 (2017), Pagination: 1544-1552Abstract
Wetlands are one of the most important ecological environments that also have high socio-economic importance. India hosts a large number of wetlands, among which most are in the Indo-Gangetic Plains formed by riverine processes. In order to understand the extensive system of riverine wetlands and their distinction from other floodplain water bodies, mainly the waterlogged areas, a mapping and classification system has been proposed and applied for wetlands in the Begusarai district of north Bihar plains, India. The proposed hydro-geomorphic classification system is hierarchical, simple, and robust, and can be implemented through quick processing of satellite images integrated with minimal ancillary data.Keywords
Hydro-Geomorphology, Mapping and Classification, Waterlogging, Wetlands.Full Text
References
- Winter, T. C., The concept of hydrologic landscapes. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 2001, 37, 335–349.
- US-EPA, Methods for evaluating wetland condition: wetland hydrology. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2008; EPA-822-R-08-024.
- Junk, W. et al., Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: a synthesis. Aquat. Sci., 2013, 75, 151–167.
- Kar, D., Wetlands and Lakes of the World, Springer, India, 2013, p. 687.
- Zoltai, S. and Pollett, F., Wetlands in Canada, their Classification, Distribution, and Use, Elsevier Scientific, 1983.
- Rundquist, D. C., Narumalani, S. and Narayanan, R. M., A review of wetlands remote sensing and defining new considerations. Remote Sensing Reviews, 2001, pp. 207–226.
- Ozesmi, S. L. and Bauer, M. E., Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecol. Manage., 2002, 10, 381–402.
- Kulawardhana, R., Thenkabail, P., Vithanage, J., Biradar, C., Islam, M. A., Gunasinghe, S. and Alankara, R., Evaluation of the wetland mapping methods using landsat ETM+ and SRTM data. J. Spatial Hydrol., 2008, 7, 62–96.
- Semeniuk, C. and Semeniuk, V., A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands. Vegetatio, 1995, 118, 103–124.
- US-EPA, Methods for evaluating wetland condition: wetlands classification. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2002; EPA-822-R-802-017.
- Brinson, M. M., A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. DTIC Document, East Carolina University, Greenville NC, 1993.
- Cole, C. A., Brooks, R. P. and Wardrop, D. H., Wetland hydrology as a function of hydrogeomorphic (hgm) subclass. Wetlands, 1997, 17, 456–467.
- Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C. and LaRoe, E. T., Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior Washington, DC, USA, 1979.
- Zoltai, S. C., An outline of the wetland regions of Canada. In Proceeding of the Workshop on Canadian Wetlands, 1997, vol. 12, pp. 1–8.
- Hughes, J., The current status of European wetland inventories and classifications. Vegetatio, 1995, 118, 17–28.
- Finlayson, C. M. and von Oertzen, I., Wetlands of Australia: Northern (tropical) Australia. In Wetlands of the World: Inventory, Ecology and Management Volume I (eds Whigham, D., Dykyjová, D. and Hejný, S.), Springer, The Netherlands, 1993, vol. 1, pp. 195–243.
- Gopal, B. and Krishnamurthy, K., Wetlands of South Asia. In Wetlands of the World: Inventory, Ecology and Management, Volume I (eds Whigham, D., Dykyjová, D. and Hejný, S.), Springer, The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 345–414.
- National Wetland Inventory and Assessment, National wetland atlas, Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad, p. 310; sac/epsa/abhg/nwia/atlas/34/2011.
- Prasad, S. et al., Conservation of wetlands of India – a review. Trop. Ecol., 2002, 43, 173–186.
- Sinha, R. and Friend, P. F., River systems and their sediment flux, indo‐gangetic plains, Northern Bihar, India. Sedimentology, 1994, 41, 825–845.
- Finlayson, C. M., Begg, G. W., Howes, J., Davies, J., Tagi, K. and Lowry, J., A Manual for an Inventory of Asian Wetlands. Wetlands International, Kuala Lumpur, 2002, p. 12; www:wetlands org/awi/AWI_Manual.pdf
- Finlayson, C. and Davidson, N., Global review of wetland resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Preface iv Summary Report, 1999, p. 15.
- Smith, R. D., Ammann, A., Bartoldus, C. and Brinson, M. M., An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. DTIC Document (No. WES/TR/WRP-DE-9). Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1995.
- Jhingran, V., Fish and Fisheries of India (revised and enlarged edition), Hindustan Publishing Corporation (India), Delhi, 1982.
- Corrigendum:Protocols for Riverine Wetland Mapping and Classification using Remote Sensing and GIS
Abstract Views :245 |
PDF Views:79
Authors
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 08 (2017), Pagination: 1737-1737Abstract
Corrigendum:
Protocols for Riverine Wetland Mapping and Classification using Remote Sensing and GIS
Full Text
References
- The reference of the book by Kar (2013) may be replaced by the following original reference:
- Mitsch, W. J. and Gosselink, J. G., Wetlands, Van Nostrand Reinhold/ITP, New York, 1993, 2nd edn.
- Kaabar Tal, Bihar’s First Ramsar Site: Status, Challenges And Recommendations
Abstract Views :267 |
PDF Views:81
Authors
Manudeo Singh
1,
Rajiv Sinha
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, IN
1 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 270-272Abstract
No Abstract.Full Text
References
- https://rsis.ramsar.org/RISapp/files/RISrep/ IN2436RIS_2010_en.pdf (access on 16 November 2020).
- Ambastha, K., Hussain, S. A. and Badola, R., Environ. Syst. Decis., 2007, 27, 261– 273.
- Shardendu, S., Sayantan, D., Sharma, D. and Irfan, S., ISRN Soil Sci., 2012, 2012, 9; https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/516947.
- Ranjan, R. K., Sinha, A. K., Gupta, D., Sappal, S. M., Kumar, A. and Ramanathan, A., J. Appl. Geochem., 2016, 18, 414–429.
- Singh, A. K. and Jayakumar, S., Imp. J. Interdiscip Res., 2016, 2, 793–803.
- Singh, M., Tandon, S. K. and Sinha, R., Earth Surf Process. Landf., 2017, 42, 1982–1996; https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4156.
- Singh, M. and Sinha, R., Geomorphology, 2020, 351, 106960; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106960.
- Singh, M. and Sinha, R., Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 651, 2473–2488; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.139.