Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Who Should Certify the Sustainability of Our Fisheries? A Property Rights Perspective on Ecolabelling


Affiliations
1 Socioeconomic Evaluation and Technology Transfer Division, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India
 

Ecolabelling as a tool toensure sustainability inthe seafood value chain is gaining popularity in recent times. As a marketled intervention, ecolabelenabled fishery certification rides on the willingness of the ecologically concerned seafood consumer to pay a premium price for the fish harvested from a sustainable fisheryon the one hand, and the sensitivity ofthe multinational food chain fraternity to the reputationalrisks associated with the food they deal with, on the other. The market opportunity arising from this scenario iseffectively harnessed bythird-party certification agencies that assessthe sustainability of a fishery and certifies it for a fee. However, analysing the existing scenario through the lens of the political economy behind property rights, this article argues that the entry of non-state entities in the ecolabelling businessis not without problems which the state should beconcerned about.

Keywords

Certification Agencies, Ecolabelling, Fisheries, Property Rights, Sustainable Seafood.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Jacquet, J. et al., Conserving wild fish in a sea of market-based efforts. Oryx, 2010, 44(1), 45–56.
  • Froese, R. and Proelss, A., Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood. Mar. Policy, 2012, 36(6), 1284–1289.
  • Constance, D. H. and Bonanno, A., Regulating the global fisheries: the World Wildlife Fund, Unilever, and the Marine Stewardship Council. Agric. Hum. Values, 2000, 17, 125–139.
  • Vandergeest, P. and Unno, A., A new extraterritoriality? Aquaculture certification, sovereignty and empire. Polit. Geogr., 2012, 31, 358–367.
  • FAO, Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of fish and fishery products from marine capture fisheries, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2009.
  • NAAS, Ecolabelling and certification in capture fisheries and aquaculture. Policy Paper 53, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, New Delhi, 2012.
  • Bush, S. R. and Peter, O., Vertically differentiating environmental standards: the case of the marine stewardship council. Sustainability, 2015, 7, 1861–1883.
  • Ponte, S., The marine Stewardship council and the making of a market for ‘sustainable fish’. J. Agrar. Change, 2012, 12, 300– 315.
  • Agnew, D. J., Rebuttal to Froese and Proelss ‘Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood’. Mar. Policy, 2013, 38, 548–550.
  • Punt, A., Gutierrez, N., Bush, S., Defeo, O., Butterworth, O. and Collie, J., Fisheries certification and ecolabeling: benefits, challenges and solutions. Fish. Res.(Spl Issue), 2016, 182, 1–176.
  • Tlusty, M. F., Environmental impact of seafood through certification and ecolabelling: theory and analysis. Fish Fish., 2012, 30, 215–224.
  • FAO, State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2016, p. 200.
  • Hardin, G., The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162, 1243–1248.
  • Parappurathu, S. and Ramachandran, C., Taming the fishing blues: reforming the marine fisheries regulatory regime in India. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2017, 52(45), 73–81.
  • FAO, State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, Meeting the sustainable development goals. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2018, p. 227.
  • World Trade Organization; https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ envir_e/labelling_e.htm (accessed during February 2019).

Abstract Views: 299

PDF Views: 79




  • Who Should Certify the Sustainability of Our Fisheries? A Property Rights Perspective on Ecolabelling

Abstract Views: 299  |  PDF Views: 79

Authors

C. Ramachandran
Socioeconomic Evaluation and Technology Transfer Division, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India
Shinoj Parappurathu
Socioeconomic Evaluation and Technology Transfer Division, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India

Abstract


Ecolabelling as a tool toensure sustainability inthe seafood value chain is gaining popularity in recent times. As a marketled intervention, ecolabelenabled fishery certification rides on the willingness of the ecologically concerned seafood consumer to pay a premium price for the fish harvested from a sustainable fisheryon the one hand, and the sensitivity ofthe multinational food chain fraternity to the reputationalrisks associated with the food they deal with, on the other. The market opportunity arising from this scenario iseffectively harnessed bythird-party certification agencies that assessthe sustainability of a fishery and certifies it for a fee. However, analysing the existing scenario through the lens of the political economy behind property rights, this article argues that the entry of non-state entities in the ecolabelling businessis not without problems which the state should beconcerned about.

Keywords


Certification Agencies, Ecolabelling, Fisheries, Property Rights, Sustainable Seafood.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi10%2F1496-1499