The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


There are rising concerns about the robustness of interpretation from Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) studies, because often correlation between AMS and geological fabric is not properly established before a wide regional- scale interpretation is made. Here, we document case studies on two dykes from the Nandurbar–Dhule dyke swarm (western India) of Deccan Volcanic Province (Figure 1 a), where we have tested if shape-preferred orientation of the elongated mineral grains (flow fabric) is actually represented by AMS fabric. In one of the dykes, we observed that AMS fabric is coplanar with the fabric of major constituent silicate minerals; hence it represents magma flow fabric. In the other dyke, AMS fabric largely represents the shape fabric of the opaque minerals which were deposited in the interstitial spaces of the mineral grains after the dyke was emplaced; hence it does not correspond to the primary magma flow fabric. These findings reinforce the need for detailed understanding of rock fabric in order to make robust interpretation of AMS data.
User
Notifications
Font Size