Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Overview of Damage Assessment of Structures


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788 010, India
 

Different available analytical and experimental metho-dologies of local and global damage index (LDI and GDI) determination for bridges and buildings along with their mathematical expression are reviewed in this article. In the literature, impact of seismic loading and material deterioration due to ageing effects is the main focus to study the performance. Case studies for assessment of bridges and buildings are appended here to understand variation of damage index (DI) for various levels of seismicity. The utility of the proposed methods has been discussed in this case study. This article also includes progressive development, limita-tions and directions of future research on damage assessment of structures. Based on the extensive liter-ature review, the authors have critically analysed the pros and cons of the available methods. However, time-dependent damage assessment, damage estima-tion for various structural and non-structural compo-nents using different materials, variation of damage for different configurations of structures, and deterio-ration of roads and bridges are the probable future scope for research. In future, damage-based design considering multiple response parameters along with uncertain load characteristics such as seismic load, wind load, blast load, floods and accidental load could be considered to select allowable damage of structures that would help to understand and ensure the time-dependent safety, progressive phases of collapse and serviceability with high reliability satisfying smart structural requirements.

Keywords

Bridges and Buildings, Damage Index, Loss Assessment, Seismicity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Griffith, A. A., The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1921, 221, 163–198.

  • Kaplan, M. F., Crack propagation and the fracture of concrete. J. Am. Concr. Inst., 1961, 58(11), 591–610.

  • Powel, G. H. and Allahabadi, R., Seismic damage prediction by deterministic method: concepts and procedures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 1988, 16, 719–734.

  • Kang, J. W. and Lee, J., A new DI for seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete columns. Struct. Eng. Mech., 2016, 60(5), 875–890.

  • Mehanny, S. S. F. and Deierlein, G. G., Seismic damage and col-lapse assessment of composite moment frames. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 2001, 127(9), 1045–1053.

  • Roufaiel, M. S. L. and Meyer, C., Reliability of concrete frames damaged by earthquakes. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1987, 113(3), 445–457.

  • Ghobarah, A., Abou-elfath, H. and Biddah, A., Response based damage assessment of structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 1999, 28, 79–104.

  • DiPasquale, E., Ju, J.-W., Askar, A. and Cakmak, A. S., Relation between global damage indices and local stiffness degradation. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1990, 116(5), 1440–1456.

  • Furtado, A., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H. and Arêde, A., Main shock–aftershock damage assessment of in-filled RC structures. Eng. Struct., 2018, 175, 645–660.

  • Li, X., Kurata, M. and Nakashim, M., Simplified derivation of a damage curve for seismically induced beam fractures in steel moment-resisting frames. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 2016, 142(6), 04016019-1–04016019-13.

  • Pandey, A. K. and Biswas, M., Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. J. Sound Vib., 1994, 169(1), 3–17.

  • Colomboa, A. and Negrob, P., A damage index of generalized applicability. Eng. Struct., 2005, 27, 1164–1174.

  • Li, Z. H., Teng, J. and He, X. F., Seismic damage analysis model for RC structures based on concrete plastic damage model. In Proceedings of the Structures Congress, ASCE, Las Vegas, USA, 2011, pp. 2768–2779.

  • Amziane, S. and Dube, J. F., Global RC structural damage index based on the assessment of local material damage. J. Adv. Concr. Technol., 2008, 6(3), 459–468.

  • Mergos, P. E. Kappos, A. J., Seismic damage analysis including inelastic shear–flexure interaction. Bull. Earth. Eng., 2010, 8, 27–46.

  • Bracci, J. M., Reinhorn, Mander, J. B. and Kunnath, S. K., Deter-ministic model for seismic damage evaluation of reinforced con-crete structures. NCEER Technical Report, 1989.

  • Yazdannejad, K. and Yazdani, A., Bayesian updating of the Park–Ang damage index for RC frame buildings under near-fault ground motions. Sci. Iran., 2017, 25, 606–616.

  • Zhai, C.-H., Bao, X., Zheng, Z. and Wang, X.-Y., Impact of after-shocks on a post-mainshock damaged containment structure con-sidering duration. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2018, 115, 129–141.

  • Tiachacht, S., Bouazzouni, A., Khatir, S., Abdel Wahab, M., Behtani, A. and Capozucca, R., Damage assessment in structures using combination of a modified Cornwell indicator and genetic algorithm. Eng. Struct., 2018, 177, 421–430.

  • Rodriguez, M. E. and Padilla, D., A damage index for the seismic analysis of reinforced concrete members. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2009, 13, 364–383.

  • Diaz, S. A., Pujades, L. G., Barbat, A. H., Vargas, Y. F. and Hi-dalgo-Leiva, D. A., Energy damage index based on capacity and response spectra. Eng. Struct., 2017, 152, 424–436.

  • Dinh-Cong, D., Vo-Duy, T. and Nguyen-Thoi, T., Damage assessment in truss structures with limited sensors using a two-stage method and model reduction. Appl. Soft Comput., 2018, 66, 264–277.

  • Guo, J., Wang, J. J., Li, Y., Zha, W. G. and Du, Y. L., Three di-mensional extension for Park and Ang damage model. Structures, 2016, 7, 184–194.

  • Jeong, S.-H. and Elnashai, A. S., New three dimensional damage index for RC buildings with planar irregularities. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 2006, 132(9), 1482–1490.

  • Jaing, H. J., Chen, L. Z. and Chen, Q., Seismic damage assessment and performance levels of reinforced concrete members. Procedia Eng., 2011, 14, 939–945.

  • Morfidis, K. and Kostinakis, K., Approaches to the rapid seismic damage prediction of RC buildings using artificial neural networks. Eng. Struct., 2018, 165, 120–141.

  • Reinhorn, A., Kunnath, S., Bracci, J. and Mander, J., Normalized damage index for evaluation of buildings. Seismic Eng.: Res. Pract., ASCE, 1989, 507–516.

  • Eraky, A., Anwar, A. M., Saad, A. and Abdo, A., Damage detec-tion of flexural structural systems using damage index method – experimental approach. Alexandria Eng. J., 2015, 54, 497–507.

  • Chandrashekhar, M. and Ganguli, R., Damage assessment of com-posite plate structures with material and measurement uncertainty. Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2016, 75, 75–93.

  • Tan, Z. X., Thambiratnam, D. P., Chan, T. H. T. and Abdu Razak, H., Detecting damage in steel beams using modal strain energy based damage index and artificial neural network. Eng. Failure Anal., 2017, 79, 253–262.

  • Wang, J.-F., Lin, C.-C. and Yen, S.-M., A story damage index of seismically-excited buildings based on modal frequency and mode shape. Eng. Struct., 2007, 29, 2143–2157.

  • DiPasquale, E. and Cakmak, Detection and assessment of seismic structural damage. Technical report NCEER-87-0015, 1987.

  • Blong, R., A new damage index. Nat. Hazards, 2003, 30, 1–23.

  • Torkamani, S., Roy, S., Barkey, M. E., Sazonov, E., Burkett, S. and Kotru, S., A novel damage index for damage identification us-ing guided waves with application in laminated composites. Smart Mater. Struct., 2014, 23, 095015-1–095015-16.

  • Massumi, A. and Moshtagh, E., A new damage index for RC buildings based on variations of nonlinear fundamental period. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 2013, 22, 50–61.

  • Praveen, K. R., Mishra, S., Babu, P., Spagnoli, A. and Carpinteri, A., Multiaxial fatigue damage assessment of welded connections in railway steel bridge using critical plane approach. Proc. Eng., 2018, 213, 776–787.

  • Campos, J., Matos, E., Casas, J. R. and Figueiras, J., A new methodology for damage assessment of bridges through instrumentation: application to the Sorraia River Bridge. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 2005, 1(4), 239–252.

  • Sung, Y.-C. and Wang, C.-Y., A study on damage assessment of the scoured bridges. J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 2013, 36(8), 994–1007.

  • Albuquerque, C., Silva, A. L. L., de Jesus, A. M. P. and Calçada, R., An efficient methodology for fatigue damage assessment of bridge details using modal superposition of stress intensity factors. Int. J. Fatigue, 2015, 81, 61–77.

  • Zhang, W., Cai, C. S. and Pan, F., Nonlinear fatigue damage as-sessment of existing bridges considering progressively deteriorat-ed road conditions. Eng. Struct., 2013, 56, 1922–1932.

  • Park, J. and Towashiraporn, P., Rapid seismic damage assessment of railway bridges using the response-surface statistical model. Struct. Saf., 2014, 47, 1–12.

  • Anastasopoulos, P. Ch., Anastasopoulos, Agalianos, A. and Sakel-lariadis, L., Simple method for real-time seismic damage assess-ment of bridges. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2015, 78, 201–212.

  • Sil, A. and Longmailai, T., Drift reliability assessment of a four storey residential building under seismic loading considering mul-tiple factors. J. Inst. Eng. (India), Ser. A, 2017, 8, 245–256.

  • Takahashi, N. and Shiohara, H., Life cycle economic loss due to seismic damage of non-structural elements. In Proceeding of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004, Paper No. 203.

  • Mori, Y. and Ellingwood, B. R., Reliability-based service-life assessment of aging concrete structures. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1993, 119(5), 1600–1621.

  • Huang, W., Qian, J. and Zhou, Z., Seismic damage assessment of steel reinforced concrete members by a modified Park–Ang model. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., 2016, 15(3), 605–611.

  • Pirasteh, S. and Li, J. and Attarzadeh, I., Implementation of the damage index approach for the rapid evaluation of earthquake resistant buildings. Earth Sci. Inform., 2015, 8, 751–758.

  • Park, Y.-J. and Ang, A. H. S., Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1985, 111(4), 722–739.

  • Guan, H. and Karbhari, V. M., Improved damage detection method based on element modal strain damage index using sparse measurement. J. Sound Vibr., 2008, 309, 465–494.

  • Banon, H., Biggs, J. M. and Irvine, H. M., Seismic damage in re-inforced concrete frames. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1981, 107(9), 1713–1729.

  • Gosain, N. K., Brown, R. H. and Jirsa, J. O., Shear requirements for load reversals on RC members. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1977, 113(7), 1461–1476.

  • Jeong, G. D. and Iwan, W. D., The effect of earthquake duration on the damage of structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 1988, 16, 1201–1211.

  • Stubbs, N., Kim, J.-T. and Farrar, C. R., Field verification of a nondestructive damage localization and severity estimation algo-rithm. In Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, 1995, 2460, 210–218.

  • Koo, K.-Y., Lee, J.-J., Yun, C.-B. and Kim, J.-T., Damage detec-tion in beam-like structures using deflections obtained by modal flexibility matrices. Adv. Sci. Technol., 2008, 56, 483–488.

  • Pandey, A. K., Biswas, M. and Samman, M. M., Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J. Sound Vib., 1991, 145(2), 321–332.

  • Ifrim, M., Dinamica structurilor şi inginerie seimică. Edit. Did. Şi Pedag. Bucureşti, 1984.


Abstract Views: 282

PDF Views: 77




  • Overview of Damage Assessment of Structures

Abstract Views: 282  |  PDF Views: 77

Authors

Pritam Hait
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788 010, India
Arjun Sil
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788 010, India
Satyabrata Choudhury
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788 010, India

Abstract


Different available analytical and experimental metho-dologies of local and global damage index (LDI and GDI) determination for bridges and buildings along with their mathematical expression are reviewed in this article. In the literature, impact of seismic loading and material deterioration due to ageing effects is the main focus to study the performance. Case studies for assessment of bridges and buildings are appended here to understand variation of damage index (DI) for various levels of seismicity. The utility of the proposed methods has been discussed in this case study. This article also includes progressive development, limita-tions and directions of future research on damage assessment of structures. Based on the extensive liter-ature review, the authors have critically analysed the pros and cons of the available methods. However, time-dependent damage assessment, damage estima-tion for various structural and non-structural compo-nents using different materials, variation of damage for different configurations of structures, and deterio-ration of roads and bridges are the probable future scope for research. In future, damage-based design considering multiple response parameters along with uncertain load characteristics such as seismic load, wind load, blast load, floods and accidental load could be considered to select allowable damage of structures that would help to understand and ensure the time-dependent safety, progressive phases of collapse and serviceability with high reliability satisfying smart structural requirements.

Keywords


Bridges and Buildings, Damage Index, Loss Assessment, Seismicity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi1%2F64-70