Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

In silico Prediction of Pyrazoline Derivatives as Antimalarial agents


Affiliations
1 College of Pharmaceutical Sc, Dayanand Sagar University, Kumarswamy Layout, Bengaluru – 560078, India
2 Krupanidhi College of Pharmacy, Carmelaram, Bengaluru - 560035, India
3 JSS College of Pharmacy, SS Nagar Bannimantap, Mysuru - 570015, India
4 Acharya and BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, Soldevanahalli, Bengaluru – 560107, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Malaria is one of the toughest health and development challenges faced by tropical countries. The resistance of malarial parasite to available drugs and currently used chemotherapy made its emergence for development of new drugs. Pyrazoline derivatives have shown good antimalarial activity. In present work, our objective is to explore pyrazoline derivatives with in silico methods for their antimalarial activity. A five-point pharmacophore was developed using 80 molecules having logIC50 ranging from 10.39 to 6.72. The pharmacophore yielded a statistically significant 3D-QSAR model with a high correlation coefficient R2= 0.806772, cross validation coefficient Q2= 0.7154 at four component PLS factor. To evaluate the effectiveness of docking protocol, we have selected crystallographic bound compound to validate our docking procedure. Protein selected for our studies with PDB id is 2BMA having resolution 2.7 &#197. Further similar orientations were observed between the superpositions of 80 compounds after pharmacophore and 3D-QSAR poses, pharmacophore and XP docking poses, 3D-QSAR and XP docking poses. These present studies will provide insight in designing novel molecules with better antimalarial activity. Results explained that two aromatic rings and two hydrophobic groups are important for the antimalarial activity. The docking studies of all selected inhibitors in the active site of 2BMA showed crucial hydrogen bond interactions with HIS95, SER97, GLN323, ARG93, ALA321, ALA346, ILE166, ILE102 and PRO96 amino acid residues.


Keywords

Antimalarial, pyrazoline, In silico, QSAR, pharmacophore
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Leven M, Held J, Duffy S, Tschan S, Sax S, Kamber J, Frank W, Kuna K, Geffken D, Siethoff, Barth S, Avery VM, Wittin S, Mordmuller B, KurzT. J. Med. Chem. 57, 2014, 7971-7976
  • Biamonte MA, Wanner J, Roch KGL. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23, 2013, 2829-2843.
  • WHO. 2016, The World Malaria Report from WHO, World Health Organization.
  • Koca I, Ozgur A, Coskun KA, Tutar Y. Biorg. Med. Chem. 21, 2013, 3859-3865.
  • Zhu SL, Wu Y, Liu CJ, Wei CY, Tao JC, Liu HM, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 65, 2013, 70-82.
  • Bekhit A, Hymete A, Bekhit AEDA, A. Damtew, H.Y. Aboul- Enein, Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 10, 2010, 1014-1033.
  • Nagarapu L, Mateti J, Gaikwad HK, Bantu R, SheebRani M, Subhashini PN, Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21, 2011, 4138-4140.
  • El-sabbagh OI, Baraka MM, Ibrahim SM, Pannecouque C, Andrei G, Snoeck R, Balzarini J, Rashad A, Eur. J.Med. Chem. 44, 2009, 3746-3753.
  • Wu L, Song B, Bhadury PS, Yang S, Hu D, Jin L, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 48, 2011, 389-396.
  • Ragavan RV, Vijayakumar V, Kumari NS, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45, 2010, 1173-1180.
  • Vijesh A, Isloor AM, Shetty P, Sundershan S, Fun HK. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 62, 2013, 410-415.
  • Cunico W, Cechinel CA, Bonacorso HG, Martins MAP, Zanatta N, de Souza MVN, Freitas IO, Soares RPP, Krettli AU. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16, 2006, 649-653.
  • Bekhit AA, Hymete A, Damtew A, Bekhit AEDA, Mohamed AMI. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.27, 2012, 69-77.
  • Dias LRS, Salvador RRS, Pharmaceuticals 5, 2012, 317-324.
  • dos Santos MS, Oliveira ML, Bernardino AM, de Leo RM, Amaral VF, de Carvalho FT, Leon LL, Canto-Cavalheiro MM. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21, 2011, 7451-7454.
  • Marra RK, Bernardino AM, Proux TA, Charret KS, Lira MLF, Castro HC, Souza AM, Oliveira CD, Borges JC, Rodrigues CR, Canto-Cavalheiro MM, Leon LL, Amaral VF. Molecules, 17, 2012, 12961-12973.
  • Dardari Z, Lemrani M, Sebban A, Bahloul A, Hassar M, Kitane S, Berrada M, Boudouma M. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 339, 2006, 291-298.
  • Garcia-Bustos JF, Francisco-Javier Gamo, Curr. Pharm. Des., 2015, 19, 270.
  • Chaturvedi D, Goswami A, Saikia PP, Barua NC Rao PG, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 435.
  • Banek K, Lalani M, Staedke SG, Malar CD. J., 2014, 13, 7.
  • Bannister LH, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2001, 98, 383. 22. Schlitzer M, Chem Med Chem, 2007, 2, 944.
  • Mckerrow JH, E. Sun E, Rosenthal PJ, Bouvier J, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1993, 47, 821.
  • Liu J, Istvan ES, Gluzman IY, J. Gross and D. E. Goldberg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 8840.
  • Karad SC, Purohit VB, Raval DK, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 84, 2014, 51-58.
  • Bekhit AA, Hassan AMM, Razik HAAE, El-Miligy MMM, El- Agroudy EJ, Bekhit AEDA European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 94, 2015, 30-44.
  • Bekhit AA, Hymete A, Sahille HS, Bekhit AEDA, Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2012, 345, 147–154.
  • Pandey AK, Sharma S, Pandey M, Alam MM, Shaquiquzzaman M, Akhter M, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 123, 2016, 476-486.

Abstract Views: 70

PDF Views: 0




  • In silico Prediction of Pyrazoline Derivatives as Antimalarial agents

Abstract Views: 70  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sonal Dubey
College of Pharmaceutical Sc, Dayanand Sagar University, Kumarswamy Layout, Bengaluru – 560078, India
Sakshi Bhardwaj
Krupanidhi College of Pharmacy, Carmelaram, Bengaluru - 560035, India
Prabitha Parbhakaran
JSS College of Pharmacy, SS Nagar Bannimantap, Mysuru - 570015, India
Ekta Singh
Acharya and BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, Soldevanahalli, Bengaluru – 560107, India

Abstract


Malaria is one of the toughest health and development challenges faced by tropical countries. The resistance of malarial parasite to available drugs and currently used chemotherapy made its emergence for development of new drugs. Pyrazoline derivatives have shown good antimalarial activity. In present work, our objective is to explore pyrazoline derivatives with in silico methods for their antimalarial activity. A five-point pharmacophore was developed using 80 molecules having logIC50 ranging from 10.39 to 6.72. The pharmacophore yielded a statistically significant 3D-QSAR model with a high correlation coefficient R2= 0.806772, cross validation coefficient Q2= 0.7154 at four component PLS factor. To evaluate the effectiveness of docking protocol, we have selected crystallographic bound compound to validate our docking procedure. Protein selected for our studies with PDB id is 2BMA having resolution 2.7 &#197. Further similar orientations were observed between the superpositions of 80 compounds after pharmacophore and 3D-QSAR poses, pharmacophore and XP docking poses, 3D-QSAR and XP docking poses. These present studies will provide insight in designing novel molecules with better antimalarial activity. Results explained that two aromatic rings and two hydrophobic groups are important for the antimalarial activity. The docking studies of all selected inhibitors in the active site of 2BMA showed crucial hydrogen bond interactions with HIS95, SER97, GLN323, ARG93, ALA321, ALA346, ILE166, ILE102 and PRO96 amino acid residues.


Keywords


Antimalarial, pyrazoline, In silico, QSAR, pharmacophore

References