Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis:The Best Evidence by Combining Data from Several Studies


Affiliations
1 Department of Community Medicine, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram (T.N.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The practice of evidence based medicine is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and patient’s values and expectations. We need evidence for both clinical practice and for public health decision making. The evidence come from good reviews which is a state-of-the-art synthesis of current evidence on a given research question. Given the explosion of medical literature, and the fact that time is always scarce, review articles play a vital role in decision-making in evidence based medical practice. Given that most clinicians and public health professionals do not have the time to track down all the original articles, critically read them, and obtain the evidence they need for their questions, therefore, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines may be their best source of evidence. Hence, the objective of this article is to introduce readers to the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, outlining why they are important, describing their methods and terminologies used and thereby helping readers with the skills to recognize and understand a reliable review.

Keywords

Evidence Based Medicine, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 168

PDF Views: 0




  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis:The Best Evidence by Combining Data from Several Studies

Abstract Views: 168  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. Gopalakrishnan
Department of Community Medicine, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram (T.N.), India
Shekhar Padhyegurjar
Department of Community Medicine, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram (T.N.), India
P. Ganeshkumar
Department of Community Medicine, SRM Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Kancheepuram (T.N.), India

Abstract


The practice of evidence based medicine is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and patient’s values and expectations. We need evidence for both clinical practice and for public health decision making. The evidence come from good reviews which is a state-of-the-art synthesis of current evidence on a given research question. Given the explosion of medical literature, and the fact that time is always scarce, review articles play a vital role in decision-making in evidence based medical practice. Given that most clinicians and public health professionals do not have the time to track down all the original articles, critically read them, and obtain the evidence they need for their questions, therefore, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines may be their best source of evidence. Hence, the objective of this article is to introduce readers to the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, outlining why they are important, describing their methods and terminologies used and thereby helping readers with the skills to recognize and understand a reliable review.

Keywords


Evidence Based Medicine, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis.